Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Legal basis for 5% tax at MGA casinos (Page 3)

Topic created on 17th Feb. 2022 | Page: 3 of 10 | Answers: 94 | Views: 18,075
Justin
Amateur

Stromberg wrote on 02/17/2022 at 13:01
Am not an expert, but my understanding is that the 10,000 euro total applies to "trade" in other EU countries...

Hence the sentence " Note: this de minimis threshold also includes turnover from any distance sales made to non-taxable persons in the rest of the Community."

Otherwise, this would not make sense if each customer was considered individually...


If you research a little further, Christoph had mentioned it in his articles several times, the EU casinos have generally always paid VAT in Germany. I'm not 100 percent sure and it's hard to find anything about it.

It is clearly said:

As soon as the threshold value of €10,000 is exceeded in a calendar year, the place of performance is again based on the domicile of the (private) service recipient (destination principle).


Yes, each customer must be considered individually. The law is clear here.

This post has been translated automatically

Justin
Amateur

Cona87 wrote on 17.02.2022 at 13:06
I guess that the total turnover in Germany counts. Sosnt yes almost no foreign company would demand taxes from you if you pay less than 10k euro year



There you think unfortunately completely wrong. This is relatively clearly regulated. You are welcome to read the article mentioned by Stromberg and Google the relevant terms and laws from there.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Justin wrote on 02/17/2022 at 1:12 pm

It clearly states:

As soon as the threshold of €10,000 is exceeded in a calendar year, the place of performance is again based on the domicile of the (private) service recipient (destination principle).


Yes, each customer must be considered individually. The law is clear here.

I do not see it that way
What sense does the sentence I quoted make? If only each customer would be considered individually, the sale to other private individuals in other EU countries would be irrelevant for reaching the total limit of 10,000 euros?

This post has been translated automatically

Justin
Amateur
As I said, I'm happy to be proven wrong!

But I have also not yet read in any terms and conditions of the N1 or Gammix and how they are all called

From your 1 Euro we keep 5% and then send it to Saxony-Anhalt, when the store is up and running.

Should be mentioned somewhere, right?

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
https://www.haufe.de/finance/haufe-finance-office-premium/ort-der-sonstigen-leistung-311-elektronische-dienstleistungen-telekommunikationsdienstleistungen-und-rundfunk-und-fernsehdienstleistungen-an-nichtunternehmer_idesk_PI20354_HI2279497.html

It also says. More than 10,000 euros to non-entrepreneurs in all other EU states. So I read that clearly as total turnover of all services...

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Justin wrote on 02/17/2022 at 1:22 pm: As I said, I'm happy to be proven wrong!

But I haven't read any T&Cs from the N1 or Gammix and what they're all called either

From your 1 Euro we keep 5% and send it to Saxony-Anhalt when the store is up and running.

Should be mentioned somewhere, right?

Yes, but transparency at OC is of course rare... 😂
Especially with this tolerated illegality... 😂

Many just offer the games with the crappy RTP, then you do not need to justify. Is according to MGA yes allowed...

This post has been translated automatically

Justin
Amateur

Stromberg wrote on 17.02.2022 at 13:20
Don't see it that way
What sense does the sentence I quoted make then? If only each customer would be considered individually anyway, wouldn't sales to other private persons in other EU countries be irrelevant for reaching the total limit of 10,000 euros?

Of course each customer must be considered individually.10.000 € in the year are nevertheless no real amount with electronic services. The law is not for gamblers who Deposit a fuffi a week

A good networked monitoring software for a 2 hectare estate in the country with data storage and monthly maintenance costs far more. In this case, the software Provider must pay taxes in Germany if it is located abroad


This post has been translated automatically

Justin
Amateur

Stromberg wrote on 02/17/2022 at 13:31
Yes, but transparency at OC is of course scarce... 😂
Especially with this tolerated illegality... 😂

Many also simply offer the games with the crappy RTP, then you do not need to justify yourself. Is according to MGA yes allowed...

That's pretty much what I said in the OP. They can lower the RTP to 85% because it's allowed

But here many also talk voin taxes that are retained. and there I see just no legal basis (and nothing in the terms and conditions of the casinos, but let me gladly teach me better!
I find our little discussion very refreshing and exciting.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Justin wrote on 02/17/2022 at 1:40 pm

That's pretty much what I said in the OP. They can get the RTP down to 85% because it's allowed

But here many also talk voin taxes that are retained. and there I see just no legal basis (and nothing in the terms and conditions of the casinos, but let me gladly teach me better!
I find our little discussion very refreshing and exciting.

The one take the tax, the other offer the poor RTP... The reasoning is the same.... Soon it will be for sure, then they just do both... 😂

Well be that as it may
So I see that with the trivial limit as described, everything else would be for me also no more trivial limit... But be it, one must not always be in agreement...

This post has been translated automatically

Caro
Expert
Justin wrote on 02/17/2022 at 1:40 pm

That's pretty much what I said in the OP. They can get the RTP down to 85% because it's allowed

But here many also talk voin taxes that are retained. and there I see just no legal basis (and nothing in the terms and conditions of the casinos, but let me gladly teach me better!
I find our little discussion very refreshing and exciting.

Just want to briefly say something about it, the tax deductions are mentioned in the terms and conditions of the respective casinos. Is usually a separate point and is called I think "taxes and duties" or similar.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Dec. 2024 at 01:22 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately