Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

GambleJoe Cookies
Providers:	GJ International Limited
	Cookie name:	PHPSESSID
	Purpose:	This cookie is created by an application based on PHP. The purpose of this cookie is to recognise the user.
	Cookie lifetime:	24 months
	Cookie name:	sid
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to assign personal configuration data.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	gjcook[ver]
	Purpose:	Version of the saved privacy setting
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	gjcook[stat]
	Purpose:	Configuration of statistic cookies
	Cookie lifetime:	12 month
	Cookie name:	identifier
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to automatically log in when using the "Stay logged in" feature.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	securitytoken
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to automatically login when using the "stay signed in" feature.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months

Google Analytics
Providers:	Google Ireland Limited
Data protection decl.:	https://policies.google.com/privacy
	Cookie name:	_ga
	Purpose:	Collection of statistics on the website usage. (Measurement of the range)
	Cookie lifetime:	24 months
	Cookie name:	_gid
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to collect user statistics for the website.
	Cookie lifetime:	24 hours
	Cookie name:	_gat
	Purpose:	Used to throttle the request rate.
	Cookie lifetime:	0

Anonym

Topic Creator

Former Member

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 11:53 am CEST#31

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Hello, just wanted to say that after 2 days I got my documents verified. And the support then the third time has really helped me. I was always satisfied with Lapalingo. Each player should just decide for themselves whether they want to do this more and more private Verification and also accept the increasingly difficult bonus conditions + the obstacles with not playable slots because of bonus, max bet, etc. Unfortunately, I will Deposit there again, but I hope that the Online Casinos sometime realize that they go a bit too far by making it more difficult every year to players what to win or not to fall into the traps of the bonus conditions. That it is technically possible in the bonus slots not playable to make, you can see at some casinos. Or the balance falls to 0 if you want to play a prohibited slot. So why does this not work at every casino. Makes no sense. Even with Wager 30x bonus and deposit, or only bonus. Why not write the same 70X wager there ready. And the Max Bet button right next to the spin button to make is also shit. Coal have the enough to technically implement, the problem is the have more and more influx from year to year and are not interested in the 20 percent who are upset and the plebs just do everything with without contradicting. Further good luck to you.

This post has been translated automatically

Top Member

zocker0815

Forum posts: 881 Member since: 21.10.2019

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 12:05 pm CEST#32

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

simkarte76 wrote on 22.07.2020 at 11:53: Hello, just wanted to say briefly in conclusion that I got after 2 days then my documents verifziert. And the support then the third time really helped me. I was always satisfied with Lapalingo. Each player should just decide for themselves whether they want to do this more and more private Verification and also accept the increasingly difficult bonus conditions + the obstacles with not playable slots because of bonus, max bet, etc. Unfortunately, I will Deposit there again, but I hope that the Online Casinos sometime realize that they go a bit too far by making it harder every year to players what to win or not to fall into the traps of the bonus conditions. That it is technically possible in the bonus slots not playable to make, you can see at some casinos. Or the balance falls to 0 if you want to play a prohibited slot. So why does this not work at every casino. Makes no sense. Even with Wager 30x bonus and deposit, or only bonus. Why not write the same 70X wager there ready. And the Max Bet button right next to the spin button to make is also shit. Coal have the enough to technically implement, the problem is that have more and more influx from year to year and are not interested in the 20 percent who are upset and the plebs just do everything with without contradicting. Further good luck to you.

Yes and you sometimes support the whole thing even by playing in such casinos... want to get upset but still play the same dirt further Congratulations

A Tip from me: Wildz SlotsMillion Twin

They are in my opinion one of the best casinos when it comes to friendliness and goodwill (and Twin sometimes the fastest to pay out)

Had just recently violated the bonus rules at Wildz and still get paid out 600 €.... I have never experienced such a thing before or even read anywhere

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Former Member

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 12:13 pm CEST#33

2 Likes

Liked this post: b****a, Falko

simkarte76 wrote on 22.07.2020 at 11:53 am: Unfortunately I will Deposit there again, but I hope that the Online Casinos eventually realize that they go a bit too far by making it harder every year to players what to win or not to fall into the traps of the bonus conditions.

Best sentence

Stable self-confidence!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Former Member

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 12:23 pm CEST#34

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

zocker0815 wrote on 22.07.2020 at 12:05 pm
Yes and you sometimes support the whole thing even by playing in such casinos... want to get upset but still play at the same dreck further congratulations

A Tip from me: Wildz SlotsMillion Twin

They are in my opinion one of the best casinos when it comes to friendliness and goodwill (and Twin sometimes the fastest to pay out)

Had just recently violated the bonus rules at Wildz and still get paid out 600 €.... I have never experienced such a thing before or even read somewhere

Hi zocker0815 since I give you completely right, first make a fuss and then is diligently played there further, no wonder that there are casinos that fully exploit, and almost always come through.

This post has been translated automatically

Amateur

Silence

Forum posts: 209 Member since: 18.02.2020

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 01:29 pm CEST#35

1 Like

Liked this post: sippi

simkarte76 wrote on 22.07.2020 at 11:53: Hello, just wanted to say briefly in conclusion that I got after 2 days then my documents verifziert. And the support then the third time really helped me. I was always satisfied with Lapalingo. Each player should just decide for themselves whether they want to do this more and more private Verification and also accept the increasingly difficult bonus conditions + the obstacles with not playable slots because of bonus, max bet, etc. Unfortunately, I will Deposit there again, but I hope that the Online Casinos sometime realize that they go a bit too far by making it more difficult every year to players what to win or not to fall into the traps of the bonus conditions. That it is technically possible in the bonus slots not playable to make, you can see at some casinos. Or the balance falls to 0 if you want to play a prohibited slot. So why does this not work at every casino. Makes no sense. Even with Wager 30x bonus and deposit, or only bonus. Why not write the same 70X wager there ready. And the Max Bet button right next to the spin button to make is also shit. Coal have the enough to technically implement, the problem is that have more and more influx from year to year and are not interested in the 20 percent who are upset and the plebs just do everything with without contradicting. Further good luck to you.

So the casinos will certainly never change what if they can do what they want, the players but still continue to pay in, why should they then also change what?

Above all, I do not understand one thing ...
You complain about the verification process, now had to make you completely naked but want to continue to deposit there and that although there are enough reputable and really good casinos in the online world ....

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Former Member

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 08:44 pm CEST#36

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Silence wrote on 22.07.2020 at 13:29
So the casinos will certainly never change anything if they can do what they want but the players still continue to Deposit .why should they change anything then?

Above all I do not understand one thing ...
You complain about the Verification process, now had to make yourself completely naked but want to continue to deposit there and that although there are enough reputable and really good casinos in the online world ....

Silence I agree with you, it is unserious what is going on.An example, a divorced woman has no income because she does not work, so no paycheck and no employer.But she gets alimony from the ex-husband.Should she submit the divorce papers, where it says what the ex has to pay for alimony?This is complete harassment this whole charade.A reputable casino does not require such a thing.In the Internet, much is written about such machinations, and it is also written there that who demands a pay slip, is unserious, and you can get his win without all this hickhack, you just have to have the staying power and be persistent.There are enough complaints offices

and help that cost a player nothing.

This post has been translated automatically

Experienced

Krabbenburger

Forum posts: 453 Member since: 07.02.2020

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 10:07 pm CEST#37

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

I think it is very important to mention that these Source of Funds checks are not arbitrarily collected by casinos, but this bullshit is the result of EU legislation.

For casinos this procedure means additional costs and internal resources.
At the same time they will lose one or the other customer because of this invasive intrusion into the privacy of players.

Of course, criticism of casinos is also appropriate when this stupid procedure is used to delay payouts or when the whole thing is made unnecessarily complicated for us players and more documents are required than necessary.

The EU laws leave room for interpretation of this nonsense and casinos should take advantage of this to make it as easy as possible for their customers.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Former Member

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 10:26 pm CEST#38

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Krabbenburger wrote on 22.07.2020 at 22:07: I think it is very important to mention that these Source of Funds checks are not arbitrarily collected by casinos, but this bullshit is the result of EU legislation.

For casinos this procedure means additional costs and internal resources.
At the same time they will lose one or the other customer because of this invasive intrusion into the privacy of players.

Of course, criticism of casinos is also appropriate when this stupid procedure is used to delay payouts or when the whole thing is made unnecessarily complicated for us players and more documents are required than necessary.

The EU laws leave room for interpretation of this nonsense and casinos should take advantage of this to make it as easy as possible for their customers.

I do not see so, the required nonsensical documents dictates no EU, that's all grown on the crap of rogue casinos, and yes such a casino makes more profit with the chicanery than loss, because then the player is harassed and annoyed until there so many lose their nerve and all gambled away again, and so it comes to no payout.Who has probably then a procedure, the casino or the player, all crooks sooooo bad deal with the players.

This post has been translated automatically

Expert

Kleinkariert

Forum posts: 1.676 Member since: 18.03.2019

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 10:33 pm CEST#39

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Herould wrote on 07/22/2020 at 10:26 pm

I do not see so, the required nonsensical documents does not prescribe an EU, that is all grown on the crap of rogue casinos, and yes such a casino makes more profit with the chicanery than loss, there is then namely the player so long harassed and annoyed until there so many lose their nerve and all gambled away again, and so it comes then to no payout.Who has probably then a procedure, the casino or the player, all crooks sooooo mies deal with the players.

There are dubious casinos and additionally the MGA / UKGC involved in all this nonsense. While the MGA and UKGC at unusual events, mostly at higher amounts it prescribe the casino to follow the whole thing, the rogue casinos use it to harass people or stall. The same with the Verification, limits, etc. the casinos turn everything to the bad for the player.

And if you think it can not get worse, then the MGA or from next year, the perhaps upcoming regulation of DE still a rib on top.

This post has been translated automatically

b****a

Forum posts: 82 Member has been banned

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

22nd Jul. 2020, at 10:44 pm CEST#40

2 Likes

Liked this post: Anonym, sippi

Kleinkariert wrote on 22.07.2020 at 22:33
There are rogue casinos and additionally the MGA / UKGC involved in all this nonsense. While the MGA and UKGC require the casino to follow up on unusual transactions, mostly for higher amounts, the rogue casinos use it to harass or stall people. The same with the Verification, limits, etc. the casinos turn everything to the bad for the player.

And if you think it can not get worse, then the MGA or from next year, the perhaps upcoming regulation of DE still a rib on top.

No one really knows what the agreements or laws are in Malta against the casinos.

This is all always pure speculation.

I'll say it again: I pay once and have never gambled, 100 €.
Wins thereby 100,000€.
Why, please explain, do I have to prove my identity intensively because of the high sum
when 99.900€ comes from the casino??? This is complete nonsense.
The casino must prove nevertheless rather to me, where it has the 99.900€, so that I am not involved in evt
Machinations with black money involved. What is the point of this?????

This would be a useful contribution for Christoph, as the legal situation in Malta is, or as the
Laws are implemented by the state and the MGA, instead of reporting from Knossi and Co.
What requirements are there for casinos? And why do I have to prove my not yet received win?
prove??? Please explain.

I hardly believe that the laws are like this, and are applied correctly. Because of my 100€ no one will
nobody will make himself in the shirt! That is 100pro a complete twisting of the laws in force, in order to pull payouts
to pull out!

If I have deposited 100,000€, then they can come to me with money laundering. But not so!

This post has been translated automatically

Online Casinos in general: Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer (Page 4)

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer

Best Online Casinos

Hot Topics26th Nov. 2024 at 08:24 am CET

Caution: Poker fraud as a business with specialised online ...

Decline in betting in Belgium despite a great summer of ...

German poker legend's WSOP bracelets up for ...

GambleJoe Team

Community Forum-Moderators

Forgotten your password?