Online Casinos in general: JETBULL Casino Experience ? (Page 5)

Kanalmalocher wrote on 28/01/2021 at 13:41
Can be a good creative solution, but can also be used as a way to cancel wins. And unlike 5 euro bet limits and banning bonus buy, this is a rule no player is used to. I'll give you autoplay, but don't press it. It's gaga. Let's see how they interpret these rules in the future

On a personal note, do you play on Jetbull and will you continue to use the "banned" features in the future?

This post has been translated automatically

TranceBabe wrote on 28/01/2021 at 15:00
Sure the casinos that want a license have to comply. But this is more about the thread creator, putting Jetbull as a bogeyman, when that is not the case at all. Jetbull has changed the terms and we as customers are obliged to read them. It does not matter what has been changed. Unfortunately I don't have the mail anymore.

Regarding the GlücksPeter:
Well, bad luck. If he doesn't read the updated terms, despite notification, it's his own fault.

If someone does not read the Bonus terms and bets more than €1 or €5 before the bonus has been converted, then the win is also gone. Ignorance does not protect from punishment.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

garfield68 wrote on 28.01.2021 at 21:06: with me comes there always only free spins at aloha for the next deposit. or 20% bonus with the next deposit.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Matthlign wrote on 28.01.2021 at 15:46
That is exactly the point - currently there may be a gambling law in every state, but these do not include the points listed by "Kanalmalocher"
These are only listed in the transitional regulation to the (possibly upcoming) gambling treaty 2021 and thus lack any legal basis
In addition, the gambling laws of the individual countries are not in accordance with European law - which is also the reason that we are currently still moving in a "gray area".
Current thus of valid laws, straight regarding the current changes is rather nonsensical
How it goes on will be shown in March, so that the gambling contract 2021 in June namely submitted at all as a template and then as a law could be decided, must ratify in March at least 13 states this
This means that there are still a few steps to go until we have a valid law that contains the current changes
I am and remain curious, there are still so many bodies and resolutions that could overturn everything

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie wrote on 01/29/2021 at 00:58
Word.

Am quite confident that the industry will intervene significantly again.
As it has been doing for decades
You must always remember, the people writing the laws are outside the industry and have no idea. The manufacturers are always one step ahead of them and are very creative in how to interpret laws in their favor.

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie wrote on 29/01/2021 at 00:58
Word.

Am quite confident that the industry will intervene significantly again.
As it has been doing for decades
You always have to remember, the people writing the laws are outside the industry and have no idea. The manufacturers are always one step ahead of them and are very creative in how to interpret laws in their favor.

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert wrote on 29.01.2021 at 01:28
But there is also a lobby that fights for strict laws. Gambling houses are against it and also casinos are afraid of the online competition. There is immediately pressed on the tear gland and reported about the online dangers meticulously.

Those who do not gamble see gambling as a waste of time, a danger to the family, and also that people gamble away their livelihoods. It is very negatively afflicted and accordingly it is also formed legally. Politicians don't actually want to legalize it, they just want to legalize it because it can't be stopped.

This post has been translated automatically