Topic created on 08th Jul. 2019 | Page: 6 of 18 | Answers: 170 | Views: 46,610
Anonym
Former Member
It's getting ridiculous
10th Jul. 2019, at 09:12 pm CEST#51
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Chillaqueen92 wrote on 09/07/2019 at 12:02 PM: Slots can eat thousands, so you don't need to get upset if after a measly fuffi or a hunni nix runs in. As Knochen says: Games with high Variance eat a long time. That is completely normal... My goodness. Some people should really look for another addiction and on small stakes you don't need to go around, what should you get out of it? Then you have to be satisfied with 100 or 200.
The comment is very interesting, better said the second paragraph.
So you have to play on high stakes so that neatly what comes around and if nothing comes around you just lose many many thousands....
The whole statements here are very, I say vague and have just as much validity as the opposite but ZERO claim to correctness!
You can also win big with a hundred euros and with 20,000 nothing really big, for both there is no guarantee but also not for the opposite. Also the RTP does not have to settle for everyone on the game value , you can also make 500,000 spins in a game and be at 68%. The people who believe they make 10,000-20,000 spins in a game, if at all and then think quite clever to announce the value is always (approximately) achieved, have not really pulled through and therefore certainly written a lot but in any case little what has a real significance. Whereby I do not say this would not be possible.
You I want to give with on the way, a high horse has an enormous depth of fall and so a proper feeding phase with high stakes has already swallowed whole fortunes, I do not wish it on you but perhaps in the future a little more respect for the low rollers would be nothing that hurts and something that would be appropriate.
Edit: gray color removed.
This post has been translated automatically
B****3
verified
Forum posts:2.680Member has been banned
It's getting ridiculous
10th Jul. 2019, at 09:17 pm CEST#52
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Unbeliver wrote on 07/10/2019 at 8:55 pm
Who said that? Games like Extra Chilli or WWM have an increased RTP when you gambble and reach a certain level. An increased RTP also means a different programming and thus in these games the free spins results are only determined after gambling by the RNG, then they are also fixed before but not already before gambling.
And who says that?
This post has been translated automatically
B****3
verified
Forum posts:2.680Member has been banned
It's getting ridiculous
10th Jul. 2019, at 09:21 pm CEST#53
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
You with your rtp
Sorry but I find it just ridiculous to believe in it
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
It's getting ridiculous
10th Jul. 2019, at 09:22 pm CEST#54
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Blubbo33 wrote on 07/10/2019 at 21:17
And who says that ?
Who says what ? I did ask who says that....
A different RTP always requires a different programming of the game and if a different programming comes to the course, the result can not have been determined before. The increased RTP you can read in the respective descriptions.
Can't we all uniformly agree to leave the RTP out of such discussions?
The RTP is not something you can f**king believe in. The RTP is simply a number. The percentage of the bet that is paid out to the player. Every individual, and I would highly recommend this to the critics, can check his RTP by writing down every spin. Not believing in the RTP only exposes you for not understanding what the RTP is. The RTP is correct, but that says nothing about whether or not cheating is taking place. If the given RTP would always be respected, everyone would permanently and always only lose. Every spin that wins is already above the RTP. I don't understand how you can always get hung up on this so simple topic.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
It's getting ridiculous
10th Jul. 2019, at 09:25 pm CEST#56
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Blubbo33 wrote on 07/10/2019 9:21 pm: you with your rtp
Sorry but I just find it ridiculous to believe in it
This is not about believing but about mathematics. The basic statements about the RTP are purely mathematically correct and the games come after several million spins also approximately to the stated values
However, this does not have to apply to the individual, even after a high number of spins played.
This post has been translated automatically
B****3
verified
Forum posts:2.680Member has been banned
It's getting ridiculous
10th Jul. 2019, at 09:25 pm CEST#57
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Unbeliver wrote on 07/10/2019 9:22 PM
Who says what? I did ask who says what....
A different RTP always requires a different programming of the game and if a different programming is used, the result can not have been determined before. You can read the increased RTP in the respective descriptions.
You write that wwm has an increased rtp when gambled. How do you know that?
This post has been translated automatically
B****3
verified
Forum posts:2.680Member has been banned
It's getting ridiculous
10th Jul. 2019, at 09:33 pm CEST#58
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Unbeliver wrote on 07/10/2019 at 21:25
This is not about believing but about mathematics. The basic statements about the RTP are purely mathematically correct and the games come after several million spins also approximately to the stated values
But this does not have to apply to the individual, even after a high number of spins played
Again such nonsense, who wants to understand this?
What brings you then a rtp ?
It has zero significance
You write it yourself. After several millions
But I have made 80000 revolutions as an example because my money is not enough for millions of revolutions. So what do I have from the rtp ? Nothing.
Who has then that the rtp e.g. at wwm so and so much percent has.
That are lockangaben, just like the maximum probability of max wins that there is never.
I play for years Bonanza, almost daily and never had a higher hit than x1600.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
It's getting ridiculous
10th Jul. 2019, at 09:38 pm CEST#59
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Blubbo33 wrote on 07/10/2019 9:33 PM
Again such nonsense, who wants to follow this?
Then what's the point of having an rtp ?
It has zero significance
You write it yourself. After several millions
But I have made 80000 revolutions as an example because my money is not enough for millions of revolutions. So what do I have from the rtp ? Nothing.
Who has then that the rtp e.g. at wwm so and so much percent has.
That are lockangaben, just like the maximum probability of max wins that there is never.
I play for years Bonanza, almost daily and never had a higher hit than x1600.
You can leave that nonsense alone. You seem to have no idea what the RTP is about and write here something illogical together. What you write and what the RTP means fits together like night and day!
Let it be, it brings you nothing...nothing so!
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
It's getting ridiculous
10th Jul. 2019, at 09:40 pm CEST#60
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Blubbo33 wrote on 07/10/2019 at 21:25
You write that wwm has increased rtp when gambled. How do you know that?
Now I've already written where you can read this, if you can not even read the comments sense, the discussion is unfortunately completely pointless.
It's getting ridiculous
Nobody has liked this post so far
The comment is very interesting, better said the second paragraph.
So you have to play on high stakes so that neatly what comes around and if nothing comes around you just lose many many thousands....
The whole statements here are very, I say vague and have just as much validity as the opposite but ZERO claim to correctness!
You can also win big with a hundred euros and with 20,000 nothing really big, for both there is no guarantee but also not for the opposite. Also the RTP does not have to settle for everyone on the game value , you can also make 500,000 spins in a game and be at 68%. The people who believe they make 10,000-20,000 spins in a game, if at all and then think quite clever to announce the value is always (approximately) achieved, have not really pulled through and therefore certainly written a lot but in any case little what has a real significance. Whereby I do not say this would not be possible.
You I want to give with on the way, a high horse has an enormous depth of fall and so a proper feeding phase with high stakes has already swallowed whole fortunes, I do not wish it on you but perhaps in the future a little more respect for the low rollers would be nothing that hurts and something that would be appropriate.
Edit: gray color removed.
This post has been translated automatically
It's getting ridiculous
Nobody has liked this post so far
And who says that?
This post has been translated automatically
It's getting ridiculous
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sorry but I find it just ridiculous to believe in it
This post has been translated automatically
It's getting ridiculous
Nobody has liked this post so far
Who says what ? I did ask who says that....
A different RTP always requires a different programming of the game and if a different programming comes to the course, the result can not have been determined before. The increased RTP you can read in the respective descriptions.
This post has been translated automatically
It's getting ridiculous
Liked this post: Anonym
The RTP is not something you can f**king believe in. The RTP is simply a number. The percentage of the bet that is paid out to the player. Every individual, and I would highly recommend this to the critics, can check his RTP by writing down every spin. Not believing in the RTP only exposes you for not understanding what the RTP is. The RTP is correct, but that says nothing about whether or not cheating is taking place. If the given RTP would always be respected, everyone would permanently and always only lose. Every spin that wins is already above the RTP. I don't understand how you can always get hung up on this so simple topic.
This post has been translated automatically
It's getting ridiculous
Nobody has liked this post so far
This is not about believing but about mathematics. The basic statements about the RTP are purely mathematically correct and the games come after several million spins also approximately to the stated values
However, this does not have to apply to the individual, even after a high number of spins played.
This post has been translated automatically
It's getting ridiculous
Nobody has liked this post so far
You write that wwm has an increased rtp when gambled. How do you know that?
This post has been translated automatically
It's getting ridiculous
Nobody has liked this post so far
Again such nonsense, who wants to understand this?
What brings you then a rtp ?
It has zero significance
You write it yourself. After several millions
But I have made 80000 revolutions as an example because my money is not enough for millions of revolutions. So what do I have from the rtp ? Nothing.
Who has then that the rtp e.g. at wwm so and so much percent has.
That are lockangaben, just like the maximum probability of max wins that there is never.
I play for years Bonanza, almost daily and never had a higher hit than x1600.
This post has been translated automatically
It's getting ridiculous
Nobody has liked this post so far
You can leave that nonsense alone. You seem to have no idea what the RTP is about and write here something illogical together. What you write and what the RTP means fits together like night and day!
Let it be, it brings you nothing...nothing so!
This post has been translated automatically
It's getting ridiculous
Nobody has liked this post so far
Now I've already written where you can read this, if you can not even read the comments sense, the discussion is unfortunately completely pointless.
This post has been translated automatically