I think the best thing about the whole mail is the behavioral tips:
As a precautionary measure, we recommend that you remain vigilant, do not send sensitive data unencrypted and check your bank and credit card statements for unusual transactions.
Yes, cool, of course it's a lot of good if the data is stored unencrypted and all together with the provider. But thanks for the tip.
Zockerbernd wrote on 14.03.2025 at 14:18: If it is real, as we know so far, you can verify everything with the leaked data set on your name except Video Ident.
That is sick! There must be drastic penalties for this!!!
No one has given me the impression that they are taking this message lightly. But what do you want to do at the moment? Unfortunately, it is probably normal for companies to first try to reassure customers and possibly talk down the incident. I don't think you can get any further without a class action anyway. Companies don't like to admit that they've messed something up. Especially when there is a theoretical compensation in the room.
No compensation after data leak from music streaming platform Here is a 1-year-old judgment. Not every data leak entitles you to compensation. I think that the judges could decide differently here, especially because ID photos etc. were also tapped. These should have been 100% more secure (encrypted) or destroyed after use.
The case law has been outdated since the BGH ruling from November 2024. In the Facebook scraping incident, the BGH affirmed damages in the order of € 100 and in the case here, significantly more should be awarded, as the data and, at first glance, the infringement is much more serious.
The case law has been outdated since the BGH ruling from November 2024. In the Facebook scraping incident, the BGH affirmed damages in the order of € 100 and in the case here, significantly more should be awarded, as the data and, prima facie, the infringement is much more serious.
Correct, I also agree with that. I didn't write anything other than that there doesn't always have to be compensation for damages and that the data is definitely more explosive here (my 2nd paragraph). However, as I am neither a judge nor a decision-maker, I have left out an assessment so as not to give false hope.
Right, I agree with that too. I didn't write anything other than that there doesn't always have to be compensation for damages and that the data here is definitely more explosive (my 2nd paragraph). However, since I am neither a judge nor a decision-maker, I have left out an assessment so as not to give false hope.
Okay, then we're all together. Upper (BGH) trumps lower (LG) and you shouldn't raise false hopes. It's not without Risk, so I had a look to see who is pursuing this as part of the class action mentioned. There is at least one Provider with Protectra, which is also pursuing the similar case with CrazyBuzzer and SlotMagie with a class action.
Already a scandal. As many here have already pointed out, I also find it borderline that video legitimization was saved.
When concluding a contract, e.g. a loan, this is understandable. But definitely not for verification.
I think this will be very expensive for Gauselmann. But they are certainly swimming in money, so the gambling will continue
Ok, then we are together. Upper (BGH) stings lower (LG) and false hopes should not be raised. It's not without Risk, so I had a look to see who is pursuing something like this as part of the class action mentioned. There is at least one Provider with Protectra, which is also pursuing the similar case with CrazyBuzzer and SlotMagie with a class action.
Interesting. Has anyone had any experience with Protectra in the past? Would one then have a claim against all 3 (Merkur Bets, Slotmagie and Crazy Buzzer) or does one then only join a class action?
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Liked this post:
Donnie,
Stromberg
Yes, cool, of course it's a lot of good if the data is stored unencrypted and all together with the provider. But thanks for the tip.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
That is sick! There must be drastic penalties for this!!!
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
The case law has been outdated since the BGH ruling from November 2024. In the Facebook scraping incident, the BGH affirmed damages in the order of € 100 and in the case here, significantly more should be awarded, as the data and, at first glance, the infringement is much more serious.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
Correct, I also agree with that. I didn't write anything other than that there doesn't always have to be compensation for damages and that the data is definitely more explosive here (my 2nd paragraph). However, as I am neither a judge nor a decision-maker, I have left out an assessment so as not to give false hope.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Liked this post:
frapi07
Okay, then we're all together. Upper (BGH) trumps lower (LG) and you shouldn't raise false hopes. It's not without Risk, so I had a look to see who is pursuing this as part of the class action mentioned. There is at least one Provider with Protectra, which is also pursuing the similar case with CrazyBuzzer and SlotMagie with a class action.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
When concluding a contract, e.g. a loan, this is understandable. But definitely not for verification.
I think this will be very expensive for Gauselmann. But they are certainly swimming in money, so the gambling will continue
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
Gauselmann is now unpacking a few more bundles and that's it;)
The dump will definitely already be available in the relevant forums for a few euros...
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
Interesting. Has anyone had any experience with Protectra in the past? Would one then have a claim against all 3 (Merkur Bets, Slotmagie and Crazy Buzzer) or does one then only join a class action?
This post has been translated automatically