Butterbrezel wrote on 18.03.2025 at 18:19: I got 10 free spins for El Torero today
It's kind of awesome, as if nothing had happened.
The Samse here. I think these are the automatic mails for promotions.
Otherwise that would be very cheeky
Very Friday no response to my email.
Again, yes, they will probably check everything that comes in first. But not getting in touch at all, at the latest after the press and TV have reported on it, is incomprehensible.
I have to ask a very stupid question as I am not affected by this topic and have no idea whatsoever. What do you hope to gain from such a possible lawsuit? Would it really be successful?
Comingsoon19 wrote on 19.03.2025 at 09:47: I have to ask very stupidly because I am not affected by the topic and have no idea at all. What do you hope to gain from such a possible lawsuit? Would it actually be successful?
Money Your data (name, telephone number, etc.) have a value. These have been lost. In addition, there is the damage that can be associated with it. People can be targeted with such data. E-mail address > phishing mail, telephone number > scam calls. ID photos and Verification photos have also been made public, i.e. there is a Risk of identity theft (contracts, orders).
There have already been successes, see the Facebook lawsuit. But there you only lost your name, email and telephone number. The yield was a little "sobering" (€25). With ID photos, on the other hand, it's worse and you can expect much more.
I consider success to be realistic because there was 0.0 security. The data was publicly accessible and in principle it is not a question of having suffered damage, but of being able to suffer damage. That would be the case here. It is impossible to know whether other people were aware of this "security gap" (it wasn't a gap, as the security was 0) and exploited it.
frapi07 wrote on March 19, 2025 at 10:04 am:
Money Your data (name, phone number etc.) have a value. These have been lost. In addition, there is the damage that can be associated with it. People can be targeted with such data. E-mail address > phishing mail, telephone number > scam calls. ID photos and Verification photos have also been made public, i.e. there is a Risk of identity theft (contracts, orders).
There have already been successes, see the Facebook lawsuit. But there you only lost your name, e-mail address and telephone number. The yield was a little "sobering" (€25). With ID photos, on the other hand, it's worse and you can expect much more.
I consider success to be realistic because there was 0.0 security. The data was publicly accessible and in principle it is not a question of having suffered damage, but of being able to suffer damage. That would be the case here. It is impossible to know whether other people were aware of this "security gap" (it wasn't a gap, as the security was 0) and exploited it.
Thanks for the explanation.
I'll keep my fingers crossed for all those affected. Let me know how it turns out. So someone from GJ should sue.
Otherwise, of course, I understand the concerns about your own data. Nowadays you can do a lot with leaked data.
But if someone does mischief with the data, can you not refer to this incident? Or file a criminal complaint with reference to the "hack" at Merkurbets.
Comingsoon19 wrote on 19.03.2025 at 09:47: I have to ask very stupidly because I am not affected by the topic and have no idea at all. What do you hope to gain from such a possible lawsuit? Would it actually be successful?
Are you not affected? You have submitted reviews for all 3 providers.
Comingsoon19 wrote on 19.03.2025 at 11:57 am:
But should someone now do mischief with the data, can't you refer to this incident? Or then file a criminal complaint with reference to the "hack" at Merkurbets.
No problem
Gamble1 has already replied to this - see https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/allgemeines/hackerangriff-auf-merkur-bets-434262/9/#p434824
You also have to think of it this way: if, for example, you receive a phishing email because of this incident, you then click on this email and enter your details, then you are still liable for the damage and not Merkurbets/Slotmagie or whoever.
The providers have reported the incident to their users and warned them of possible attacks. They are therefore not liable for any future damage. However, this has nothing to do with compensation for the data.
I have no experience of this. This statement is only based on my (basic) knowledge.
Comingsoon19 wrote on March 19, 2025 at 12:49 pm:
Yes right. But account closed on all of them. Only play at Novoline now
Been waiting for something like this again. But dear Slotliebe89 no I'm not affected.
Just because you've closed your accounts doesn't mean you're no longer in their database xD
I would contact them and ask if your data is also affected. Most likely they will also refer you to the data protection officer. Just a well-intentioned tip.
But should someone now do mischief with the data, can't you refer to this incident? Or then file a criminal complaint with reference to the "hack" at Merkurbets.
Yes, absolutely. But unfortunately you still have the hassle, the worry and the expense (which can be really considerable).
Just because you closed your accounts doesn't mean you're no longer in their database xD
I would contact them and ask if your data is also affected. Most likely they will also refer you to the data protection officer. Just a well-intentioned tip.
I haven't been active there for a long time. I think if it had affected me, I would have received this email too. Regardless of whether it was from SlotMagie, Merkurbets etc. I also checked my e-mail address on this page a few posts ago and everything is fine so far.
But I will make an inquiry. Then report what came out
There are many data leaks, and if you take a closer look, you will often find that your email address has already appeared several times in different databases. You can easily get an initial estimate by checking your email address at https://haveibeenpwned.com/ (one of several sites where you can roughly check this).
I used another site (from a university) and found the result very interesting.
A long list of leaks/hacks (a large part of which are apparently simply "repacks" of previous publications).
Some of it goes back 20 years, with hacks from Myspace and Stickam, among others.
I guess that's to be expected when you've been using the same email address almost everywhere for a quarter of a century.
Considering that, I actually receive surprisingly little spam.
It's reassuring for me that "only" the password and email address were affected and that I'm not one of those people who use the same password for several sites.
I used a different site (from a university) and found the result very interesting.
A long list of leaks/hacks (a large part of which are apparently simply "repacks" of previous releases).
Some of it goes back 20 years, with hacks from Myspace and Stickam, among others.
I guess that's to be expected when you've been using the same email address almost everywhere for a quarter of a century.
Considering that, I actually receive surprisingly little spam.
It's reassuring for me that "only" the password & email address were affected & I'm not one of those people who use the same PW for several sites.
Yes, I know the site you are referring to. In my post I only mentioned one possible site - there are quite a few of them. Basically, these sites check databases that have been filled with stolen data records in the past or are offered publicly on the darknet.
However, this does not provide 100% security, as a lot of data is also traded underhand in the right places.
You should always remain vigilant after such incidents. Providers such as Schufa or some VPN services offer real-time protection and support in the event of identity theft. Although this costs something, it can be worthwhile for those who want to feel more secure.
On the subject of data leaks in general: you have to expect them if you are digitally active. Precisely because so much data is tapped into, even with the best security, I don't understand how such a serious incident could occur in which the data was obviously not protected at all. This is by no means uncharted territory and cannot be explained away by cost-cutting measures - it seems that someone has simply made a huge mistake.
I have now received a reply from Slotmagie.... As expected, they see themselves in the right and see no reason to pay compensation as they have done nothing wrong! It has been proven that the data of millions of customers was publicly accessible...sensitive data such as identities, bank details etc..
Here is the answer:
Arnold (SlotMagie)
19. March 2025, 18:31 CET
Hello David,
Of course we take your concerns very seriously, but unauthorized use of your data elsewhere can be ruled out. The situation you have described is in no way connected to our incident, there is no connection whatsoever.
To our knowledge, no material damage has been caused to our customers, as we have not detected any misuse by or disclosure of data to unauthorized third parties. In this respect, you are not entitled to any claims for compensation from us. If you have any indication that your data has been misused, please contact us immediately at the e-mail address [email protected].
Actions on the Internet are associated with certain risks and cyber security is a continuous process that is subject to ongoing adjustments. Just because the security configurations on a company's website need to be adjusted does not mean that this is due to misconduct on the part of the company or that the company has violated laws or regulations. Nor does such liability arise from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, no material damage has been caused to our customers, as we have not detected any misuse by or disclosure of data to unauthorized third parties.
Against this background, we therefore do not see ourselves in a position to comply with any request for payment of damages. In cooperation with the supervisory authority responsible for us, which drew our attention to the improvement of the security loopholes, we immediately adjusted them. We therefore see no basis for complying with your request.
Yours sincerely
Your SlotMagie Team
XXLEONIDASXX wrote on 19.03.2025 at 18:48: So I have now received an answer from Slotmagie...As expected, they see themselves in the right and see no reason to pay damages, as they would not have done anything wrong! It has been proven that the data of millions of customers was publicly accessible..sensitive data such as identities, bank details etc..
Here is the answer:
Arnold (SlotMagie)
19. March 2025, 18:31 CET
Hello David,
Of course we take your concerns very seriously, but unauthorized use of your data elsewhere can be ruled out. The situation you have described is in no way connected to our incident, there is no connection whatsoever.
To our knowledge, no material damage has been caused to our customers, as we have not detected any misuse by or disclosure of data to unauthorized third parties. In this respect, you are not entitled to any claims for compensation from us. If you have any indication that your data has been misused, please contact us immediately at the e-mail address [email protected].
Actions on the Internet are associated with certain risks and cyber security is a continuous process that is subject to ongoing adjustments. Just because the security configurations on a company's website need to be adjusted does not mean that this is due to misconduct on the part of the company or that the company has violated laws or regulations. Nor does such liability arise from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, no material damage has been caused to our customers, as we have not detected any misuse by or disclosure of the data to unauthorized third parties.
Against this background, we therefore do not see ourselves in a position to comply with any request for payment of damages. In cooperation with the supervisory authority responsible for us, which drew our attention to the improvement of the security loopholes, we immediately adjusted them. We therefore see no basis for complying with your request.
Yours sincerely
Your SlotMagie Team
Of course you don't want to make an admission.
However, the situation is quite clear.
So there seems to be no way around legal action, e.g. in the form of a class action.
The statement that you were unable to identify any disclosure of data to third parties is particularly brazen and
Just because the security configurations on a company's website need to be adjusted does not mean that this is due to misconduct on the part of the company or that the company has violated laws or regulations.
After all, the data has demonstrably fallen into the hands of unauthorized third parties.
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
The Samse here. I think these are the automatic mails for promotions.
Otherwise that would be very cheeky
Very Friday no response to my email.
Again, yes, they will probably check everything that comes in first. But not getting in touch at all, at the latest after the press and TV have reported on it, is incomprehensible.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Liked this post:
Comingsoon19,
Danny0815,
XXLEONIDASXX
Money Your data (name, telephone number, etc.) have a value. These have been lost. In addition, there is the damage that can be associated with it. People can be targeted with such data. E-mail address > phishing mail, telephone number > scam calls. ID photos and Verification photos have also been made public, i.e. there is a Risk of identity theft (contracts, orders).
There have already been successes, see the Facebook lawsuit. But there you only lost your name, email and telephone number. The yield was a little "sobering" (€25). With ID photos, on the other hand, it's worse and you can expect much more.
I consider success to be realistic because there was 0.0 security. The data was publicly accessible and in principle it is not a question of having suffered damage, but of being able to suffer damage. That would be the case here. It is impossible to know whether other people were aware of this "security gap" (it wasn't a gap, as the security was 0) and exploited it.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Liked this post:
Danny0815
Thanks for the explanation.
I'll keep my fingers crossed for all those affected. Let me know how it turns out. So someone from GJ should sue.
Otherwise, of course, I understand the concerns about your own data. Nowadays you can do a lot with leaked data.
But if someone does mischief with the data, can you not refer to this incident? Or file a criminal complaint with reference to the "hack" at Merkurbets.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
Are you not affected? You have submitted reviews for all 3 providers.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
No problem
Gamble1 has already replied to this - see https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/allgemeines/hackerangriff-auf-merkur-bets-434262/9/#p434824
You also have to think of it this way: if, for example, you receive a phishing email because of this incident, you then click on this email and enter your details, then you are still liable for the damage and not Merkurbets/Slotmagie or whoever.
The providers have reported the incident to their users and warned them of possible attacks. They are therefore not liable for any future damage. However, this has nothing to do with compensation for the data.
I have no experience of this. This statement is only based on my (basic) knowledge.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, that's right. But account closed with all of them. Now only play at Novoline
I've been waiting for something like this again. But dear Slotliebe89, no, I'm not affected.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
Just because you've closed your accounts doesn't mean you're no longer in their database xD
I would contact them and ask if your data is also affected. Most likely they will also refer you to the data protection officer. Just a well-intentioned tip.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, absolutely. But unfortunately you still have the hassle, the worry and the expense (which can be really considerable).
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
I understand that.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
I haven't been active there for a long time. I think if it had affected me, I would have received this email too. Regardless of whether it was from SlotMagie, Merkurbets etc. I also checked my e-mail address on this page a few posts ago and everything is fine so far.
But I will make an inquiry. Then report what came out
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
I used another site (from a university) and found the result very interesting.
A long list of leaks/hacks (a large part of which are apparently simply "repacks" of previous publications).
Some of it goes back 20 years, with hacks from Myspace and Stickam, among others.
I guess that's to be expected when you've been using the same email address almost everywhere for a quarter of a century.
Considering that, I actually receive surprisingly little spam.
It's reassuring for me that "only" the password and email address were affected and that I'm not one of those people who use the same password for several sites.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Liked this post:
Danny0815
Yes, I know the site you are referring to. In my post I only mentioned one possible site - there are quite a few of them. Basically, these sites check databases that have been filled with stolen data records in the past or are offered publicly on the darknet.
However, this does not provide 100% security, as a lot of data is also traded underhand in the right places.
You should always remain vigilant after such incidents. Providers such as Schufa or some VPN services offer real-time protection and support in the event of identity theft. Although this costs something, it can be worthwhile for those who want to feel more secure.
On the subject of data leaks in general: you have to expect them if you are digitally active. Precisely because so much data is tapped into, even with the best security, I don't understand how such a serious incident could occur in which the data was obviously not protected at all. This is by no means uncharted territory and cannot be explained away by cost-cutting measures - it seems that someone has simply made a huge mistake.
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Nobody has liked this post so far
Here is the answer:
19. March 2025, 18:31 CET
Hello David,
Of course we take your concerns very seriously, but unauthorized use of your data elsewhere can be ruled out. The situation you have described is in no way connected to our incident, there is no connection whatsoever.
To our knowledge, no material damage has been caused to our customers, as we have not detected any misuse by or disclosure of data to unauthorized third parties. In this respect, you are not entitled to any claims for compensation from us. If you have any indication that your data has been misused, please contact us immediately at the e-mail address [email protected].
Actions on the Internet are associated with certain risks and cyber security is a continuous process that is subject to ongoing adjustments. Just because the security configurations on a company's website need to be adjusted does not mean that this is due to misconduct on the part of the company or that the company has violated laws or regulations. Nor does such liability arise from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, no material damage has been caused to our customers, as we have not detected any misuse by or disclosure of data to unauthorized third parties.
Against this background, we therefore do not see ourselves in a position to comply with any request for payment of damages. In cooperation with the supervisory authority responsible for us, which drew our attention to the improvement of the security loopholes, we immediately adjusted them. We therefore see no basis for complying with your request.
Yours sincerely
Your SlotMagie Team
This post has been translated automatically
Hacker attack on Merkur Bets
Liked this post:
Danny0815
Of course you don't want to make an admission.
However, the situation is quite clear.
So there seems to be no way around legal action, e.g. in the form of a class action.
The statement that you were unable to identify any disclosure of data to third parties is particularly brazen and
Just because the security configurations on a company's website need to be adjusted does not mean that this is due to misconduct on the part of the company or that the company has violated laws or regulations.
After all, the data has demonstrably fallen into the hands of unauthorized third parties.
This post has been translated automatically