-
Langhans_innen, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 10:07 am CET
-
TennisFreak, on 14th Sep. 2024 at 07:52 pm CEST
-
R3hab, today at 03:31 am CET
-
R3hab, today at 03:20 am CET
-
Bacione85, today at 03:06 am CET
-
Beccyt69, today at 01:10 am CET
-
frapi07, today at 12:14 am CET
-
gamble1, today at 12:06 am CET
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 10:19 pm CET
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 10:17 pm CET
-
Patizi, yesterday at 09:44 pm CET
-
bigbig, yesterday at 07:59 pm CET
-
danny005, yesterday at 06:07 pm CET
-
Kleinkariert, yesterday at 03:29 pm CET
-
Hanshanshans, yesterday at 03:12 pm CET
-
frapi07, yesterday at 11:17 am CET
-
Jasonknz878, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 11:37 pm CET
-
Pat1991, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 06:53 pm CET
-
Julian, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 06:51 pm CET
-
fischermann, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 08:41 am CET
-
Tanja1987, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 07:44 am CET
-
Donnie, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 02:53 pm CET
-
Casinonutzer1307, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 02:15 pm CET
-
frapi07, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 12:59 pm CET
-
Stromberg, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 09:15 am CET
-
frapi07, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 02:45 am CET
Gammix Limited company / casinos ( MGA) become Starscream Limited ( ??? )
Nobody has liked this post so far
i would like to know what you think about all the gammix casinos moving and being completely turned upside down from the license to the agbs to the game providers being wiped out.
maybe someone can also enlighten me why, why, why the whole thing has or will still have this course of events.
thank you and love
This post has been translated automatically
Gammix Limited company / casinos ( MGA) become Starscream Limited ( ??? )
Liked this post: Max_Bet
Through the MGA license and the seat on Malta are the rather tangible for the authorities and of course for all the back bookers with their lawyers as if they were not in the EU squat and I suspect this fact was also taken into account in the decision-making process
Thus the proceeding is actually at least from an entrepreneurial point of view quite logical and even sensible to be able to keep the business operation
This post has been translated automatically
Gammix Limited company / casinos ( MGA) become Starscream Limited ( ??? )
Nobody has liked this post so far
that is understandable.
but why do you have to throw out half of the game providers right away?
thank you for your answer
This post has been translated automatically
Gammix Limited company / casinos ( MGA) become Starscream Limited ( ??? )
Liked this post: genrix
And yes, I was also fleeced at the group times, but that was sometimes self-owned.
When I look at the new group and the conditions (max. payouts 10x the bonus) can only be bad - I think it's a shame.
This post has been translated automatically
Gammix Limited company / casinos ( MGA) become Starscream Limited ( ??? )
Liked this post: Mallpall
I agree with that. My "favorite" casino group became uninteresting from one day to the next.
This post has been translated automatically
Gammix Limited company / casinos ( MGA) become Starscream Limited ( ??? )
Nobody has liked this post so far
and the others will follow little by little.
what gamble 1 has answered, is not so therefore fetched one could leave it also so stand only then I change nevertheless also only the seat and the name and otherwise nothing.all the more not that which the gammix G made out.
i have a completely different theory.
This post has been translated automatically
Gammix Limited company / casinos ( MGA) become Starscream Limited ( ??? )
Nobody has liked this post so far
Because they may not have permission to offer their games under the new license or the providers may not want to
This post has been translated automatically