Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Gambling fees VISA (Page 5)

Topic created on 16th Apr. 2018 | Page: 5 of 5 | Answers: 48 | Views: 21,068
Daniel
Elite
Even if you make fun of it, I would not reject it even so from the hand,
that on the part of the justice times is intervened. Finally Finazdienstleister have all
mastercard and Co have a not insignificant lobby, in the end there is a bank
behind it, and there the German state reacts extremely empflindlich.

Where am I making fun of this? I see it exactly the same way as you do. I have only exaggerated it, should not be funny.

One could observe during the crisis in 2008 what happened. There was no money for nothing but when the banks were not doing well, they were rescued with huge sums. So when push comes to shove (if everyone would return their deposits), then every player who has ever deposited in an online casino will rather be verutreilt, than that important (systemically important) banks take a too large damage. The media would then also in the sense of the banks and against the players exploit and there would be no one can effectively come to the aid. To exaggerate, they would make so much propaganda that the people would end up demanding the death penalty for gamblers.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
Ah ok, then I misunderstood.

I agree with you!
With banks the fun stops...

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Zockertyp89 wrote on 05/09/2018 at 13:16: The bottom line is that PayPal is also liable to prosecution and you could get your deposits back or is that different?

Paypal already does this:

"PayPal waived payment claims in the amount of almost 95,000 euros. An online gambler had used this sum via PayPal for casino games at Quasargaming. On the admission of the law firm, online casino games and the associated payment transactions are illegal in Germany, PayPal had informed that there are no more claims."

However, this was about the Paypal buyer protection, and not about the illegality of online casinos. I think we already had the topic here in the forum.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Mombasa wrote on 05/09/2018 at 14:33
Paypal already does this:

"PayPal waived payment claims amounting to almost 95,000 euros. An online gambler had used this sum via PayPal for casino games at Quasargaming. In response to the law firm's plea that online casino games and the associated payment transactions were illegal in Germany, PayPal had said that there were no longer any claims."

However, this was about the Paypal buyer protection, and not about the illegality of online casinos. I think we already had the topic here in the forum.


The buyer protection is no longer available when it comes to payments to casinos! And what you quote is also the only known case.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
But any payment transaction between private individuals and casinos is illegal in principle.
I don't quite understand that, Mombasa.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
stkrie wrote on 05/09/2018 at 14:51: But any payment transaction between private individuals and casinos is illegal in principle.
Don't quite get it now, mombasa.

In principle, yes...
But there is a judgment in Brussels just not yet on this. According to the ECJ, the (lack of) German regulation of gambling and the gambling monopoly is not EU-compliant.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
However, the ECJ has left a loophole. As long as the protection of players and minors is not
is granted, a ban is legal. This would first have to be made up for and verifiable.

Therefore, this is all very vague again!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
stkrie wrote on 05/09/2018 at 15:52

From there, it's all very squishy again!

Yep, all the same as before.
But well, I still believe in a regulation of Online Casinos in Germany. Perhaps similar (bad) as in Switzerland.

This post has been translated automatically

dan3b3n
Visitor
dnight wrote on 05/09/2018 at 14:27: just got refunded almost 180 euros in fees from diba without comment. No idea why? Is there anyone else like this or was there a corresponding ruling in the meantime

Was announced on 3.9. by ING via postbox message. About new messages you are notified in parallel by mail. As a user of an online bank, it is good to check from time to time.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics18th Nov. 2024 at 04:22 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately