I think it's good that Gamblejoe actually now deals with the idea of maybe listing one or the other Curacao casino here. You can always put such a casino here on the Blacklist down, if it should make serious problems such as payouts refuse. This then GJ also finds the direct communication wire to these casinos, this can already have an effect on an improvement. Finally, there were also many casinos with Malta license the players have often caused problems and solutions were found here only when GJ has taken up the communication there. You can try it and leave the taboo from back then to Curacao behind, now that so much has changed and you are forced by this new unpleasant situation to rethink
Falko wrote on 07.07.2021 at 17:20: I think it's good that Gamblejoe actually now deals with the thought here maybe times the one or other Curacao casino to list. You can always put such a casino here on the Blacklist down, if it should make serious problems such as payouts refuse. This then GJ also finds the direct communication wire to these casinos, this can already have an effect on an improvement. Finally, there were also many casinos with Malta license the players have often caused problems and solutions were found here only when GJ has taken up the communication there. You can try it and leave the taboo from back then to Curacao behind, now that so much has changed and you are forced by this new unpleasant situation to rethink.
But you are forgetting the point about the new gambling treaty. If at some point the issue of legal / illegal is clarified, it is from my point of view regarding the banks a Risk if you use Curacao casinos.
Since the casino itself can be "reputable". But if this does not want to comply with the new German rules, there could be problems with the banks for the players.
Wutmaennchen wrote on 07/07/2021 at 17:47
But you forget the point with the new gambling treaty. If at some point the issue of legal / illegal is clarified, it is from my point of view regarding the banks a Risk if you use Curacao casinos.
Since the casino itself can be "reputable". But if this does not want to comply with the new German rules, there could be problems with the banks for the players.
Not only the banks as they are not EU licensed they are 100% classified as illegal
Wutmaennchen wrote on 07/07/2021 at 17:47
But you forget the point with the new gambling treaty. If at some point the issue of legal / illegal is clarified, it is from my point of view regarding the banks a Risk if you use Curacao casinos.
Since the casino itself can be "reputable". But if this does not want to comply with the new German rules, there could be problems with the banks for the players.
But if you use e-wallets, who wants to be in the burden of proof at the end? Is but logistically not even possible as long as you can use e-wallets. Or am I wrong there ?
Slots are not "bought" but simply licensed through a model known as "license fees". Whether providers are worthwhile for the DE market depends on the license fees and the tax that is added. OC simply calculates soberly
Anyway, if Play n Go is the "biggest" cheater for you, ever thought about not playing anymore? Who forces you to spend money on it? Claim here some do a lot when the day is long.
Thank you for explaining what I have misunderstood so far.
Habs wrongly formulated
Question should not be whether providers come back, but the former, remote slots of providers eg.
Netent & PushGaming & BTG? (offer 3-5 slots)
@Whatabouttism
Understand it this way according to your explanation:
So royalties + tax at NETENT's Starbust are still profitable for OC and the other 300 slots are not?
@GJ & all
So does it stay with the selection?
When answering, it is asked not to necessarily fix on the specified Provider (Just an example).
@Whatabouttism
Nobody forces me to gamble and I also thought about quitting.
PnG should serve because of the representation of some users in the forum, as a striking example to my amazement at the continuing high number of games offered
Maybe next time you may not so much into things reininterpret, which were not written.
Did not write that I think PnG is a scammer but thanks for the tips anyway
Chrizzi wrote on 08.07.2021 at 01:08
Thank you for explaining what I have misunderstood so far.
Got it wrong.
Question should not be whether providers come back, but the former, remote slots of providers e.g.
Netent & PushGaming & BTG? (offer 3-5 slots)
@ Whatabouttism
Understand it according to your explanation like this:
So royalties + tax at NETENT's Starbust are still profitable for OC and the other 300 slots are not?
@GJ & all
Does it remain with the selection?
When answering, it is requested not to be absolutely fixed on the given Provider (only one example).
@Whatabouttism
Nobody forces me to gamble and I also thought about quitting.
PnG should serve due to the representation of some users in the forum, as plakatives Bsp to my astonishment over the further high number of the offered plays .
Maybe next time you might not interpret so much into things which were not written.
Didn't write that I think PnG are cheaters but anyway thanks for the tips
To get back to your initial question. I think some games will come back with new rtp
Sunmaker sunnyplayer eb have hardly Merkur games in it, but I think that these are popular in Germany and therefore revised will come back
Quickspin has disappeared from both of them, but Tipico Games still runs with the old RTP of 95 - 96 percent.
Is for me a sign that partly whole providers still revise their slots or at least part of their games
On the other hand, many games from eg Netent have already been taken out last year in many casinos (not only Jackpot games). Therefore, a reduced range of games and thus lower license costs but also seems to be a point
Stromberg wrote on 08/07/2021 at 08:22 AM
To go back to your initial question. I think some games will come back with new rtp
Sunmaker sunnyplayer e.g. have hardly any Merkur games in it, but I think that these are popular just in Germany and therefore revised will come back
Quickspin has disappeared from both of them, but Tipico Games still runs with the old RTP of 95 - 96 percent.
Is for me a sign that partly whole providers still revise their slots or at least part of their games
On the other hand, many games from eg Netent have already been taken out last year in many casinos (not only Jackpot games). Therefore, a reduced range of games and thus lower license costs but also seems to be a point
Thanks for the insight on how it looks like in the casinos you are out. Also for the guesses as it probably goes on.
Only play myself where everything has already been adjusted.
Could live up to the 5 sec with all the changes but the range of choice is already ne real restriction
Above all, then certainly little new then come..
Gamblejoe team where are you?
Liked this post: u****9
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe team where are you?
Nobody has liked this post so far
But you are forgetting the point about the new gambling treaty. If at some point the issue of legal / illegal is clarified, it is from my point of view regarding the banks a Risk if you use Curacao casinos.
Since the casino itself can be "reputable". But if this does not want to comply with the new German rules, there could be problems with the banks for the players.
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe team where are you?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Not only the banks as they are not EU licensed they are 100% classified as illegal
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe team where are you?
Liked this post: supermode
But if you use e-wallets, who wants to be in the burden of proof at the end? Is but logistically not even possible as long as you can use e-wallets. Or am I wrong there ?
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe team where are you?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Thank you for explaining what I have misunderstood so far.
Habs wrongly formulated
Question should not be whether providers come back, but the former, remote slots of providers eg.
Netent & PushGaming & BTG? (offer 3-5 slots)
@Whatabouttism
Understand it this way according to your explanation:
So royalties + tax at NETENT's Starbust are still profitable for OC and the other 300 slots are not?
@GJ & all
So does it stay with the selection?
When answering, it is asked not to necessarily fix on the specified Provider (Just an example).
@Whatabouttism
Nobody forces me to gamble and I also thought about quitting.
PnG should serve because of the representation of some users in the forum, as a striking example to my amazement at the continuing high number of games offered
Maybe next time you may not so much into things reininterpret, which were not written.
Did not write that I think PnG is a scammer but thanks for the tips anyway
Edit font color
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe team where are you?
Nobody has liked this post so far
To get back to your initial question. I think some games will come back with new rtp
Sunmaker sunnyplayer eb have hardly Merkur games in it, but I think that these are popular in Germany and therefore revised will come back
Quickspin has disappeared from both of them, but Tipico Games still runs with the old RTP of 95 - 96 percent.
Is for me a sign that partly whole providers still revise their slots or at least part of their games
On the other hand, many games from eg Netent have already been taken out last year in many casinos (not only Jackpot games). Therefore, a reduced range of games and thus lower license costs but also seems to be a point
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe team where are you?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Thanks for the insight on how it looks like in the casinos you are out. Also for the guesses as it probably goes on.
Only play myself where everything has already been adjusted.
Could live up to the 5 sec with all the changes but the range of choice is already ne real restriction
Above all, then certainly little new then come..
Must probably wait or pay off.
Edit font color
This post has been translated automatically