You must not pay so much attention to these many comparison sites many of them are just out to make money and list everything and everyone who pays very well that helps you in most cases no one if there are problems
At GJ is different here you will find good casinos and if really times what does not fit you will always be helped just as a little Tip
As for your win it's true just because it has no good license it must not be bad there are many casinos that have no license or no good and everything runs top but it's just a fact that when it comes to money you should always have someone in the back of the hand who can mediate in case of problems
Best example a 0815 store without imprint and everything can also send the order but what if he does not?
I think from the feeling you get your money but the casino will take a very very long time and hope that you gamble away everything try to save as much as possible
Have won from the 50€ with small stakes then 300 and thought I Probier my luck 5€ compartment reactoonz then came a 5800€ picture and then I have always won in other games something until I was at 14.5 k.
As I said I got an email that they still want a selfie with ID in hand and Wazamba website in the background to complete the verification.
So far everything is still ok
Account not locked and full credit is also still on it.
Not all Curacao casinos are scumbags. There are really a few white among a herd of black sheep. So I wish you all the best and congratulations on your win because I haven't heard anything really bad about this casino.
Babayaro wrote on 07/15/2020 at 10:50 am: Yes the support is actually quite friendly. [...]
Yes, they are almost all and has little to say at first. And as already written, do not rely on any comparison sites, it's all about making money. You should also avoid YouTube comments. In the future, look at user reviews or threads (like here on GJ) to see what people's experiences are
Babayaro wrote on 07/15/2020 at 5:31 pm: Yes I do.
I'll let you know if anything new happens.
Thank you !
do not be scared. I see it like Wettibernd & Gamble1:
not all C-casinos are bad, there are some, so many mga-casino can cut off a slice. and among them there are so many black sheep... there is in doubt all the support and all the Malta license in the world nen moist handshake worth (if at all)
wazamba will not sabotage its reputation for free and for no reason. i looked at Casino Guru - is my favorite site when it comes to casino reviews - and there are the with 0 complaints since inception and very well rated (yes, even the gurus are not infallible and reingucken you can not, but have in my opinion the nose in front, which - as far as possible - unbiased casino reviews and assessments. there is also not from the outset everything down, which is not mga. found the so far quite reliable)
Casino Guru? Really now? Well everyone must know for themselves...
And even if some MGA casinos could take a leaf out of , the difference is, if an MGA casino doesn't want to pay out, they still do it according to the "laws". And yes, some of them mercilessly exploit every loophole. Beyond that, though, it gets tricky. However, no Curacao clique has to comply with that. They do it the way they like it. And if Wazamba is what they think they are, they'll get themselves a proper license...
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
15th Jul. 2020, at 11:32 pm CEST#19
2 Likes
Liked this post: v****2, x****Y
sippi wrote on 07/15/2020 at 19:19: Casino Guru? Really now?? Well everyone must know for themselves...
And even if some MGA casinos could 'take a leaf out of , the difference is, if a MGA casino doesn't want to pay out, they still do it according to the "laws". And yes, some of them mercilessly exploit every loophole. Beyond that, though, it gets tricky. However, no Curacao clique has to comply with that. They do it the way they like it. And if Wazamba is what they think they will get a proper license...
hmm - ok, what is wrong with Casino Guru? serious question. "well, everyone has to know for themselves..." is neither a friendly nor a comprehensible statement.
on the subject of mga &" if a MGA casino does not want to pay out, then they still do it according to the "laws""
pardon? what kind of insanity is that? and it's not even true. a pretty big part of the bonus rule violation payout refusals on the part of the casinos, besides the max-bet-rule violations, is the double account accusation (just one example). that doesn't even have to be proven. it doesn't work in most cases. both casino x in malta and casino y in hawaii can make up whatever they want. what laws?
and what loopholes? none are needed because of the lack of laws. and no mga-clitsche has to comply with anything - they just look like the others, how big the damage to their reputation is, if they pull the case of peter s. at the m. now hard as nails, because of 250,000 withheld.
but that's it. there is simply no independent regulation
(you have conjured up a, rabbit out of the hat? - ah, too bad, unfortunately you violated the rabbits-may-not-be-kept-in-honey rule. it's been online in our terms and conditions for at least two hours - and they're always right)
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Nobody has liked this post so far
At GJ is different here you will find good casinos and if really times what does not fit you will always be helped just as a little Tip
As for your win it's true just because it has no good license it must not be bad there are many casinos that have no license or no good and everything runs top but it's just a fact that when it comes to money you should always have someone in the back of the hand who can mediate in case of problems
Best example a 0815 store without imprint and everything can also send the order but what if he does not?
I think from the feeling you get your money but the casino will take a very very long time and hope that you gamble away everything try to save as much as possible
This post has been translated automatically
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Nobody has liked this post so far
As I said I got an email that they still want a selfie with ID in hand and Wazamba website in the background to complete the verification.
So far everything is still ok
Account not locked and full credit is also still on it.
I will report further
This post has been translated automatically
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Liked this post: Anonym
This post has been translated automatically
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, they are almost all and has little to say at first. And as already written, do not rely on any comparison sites, it's all about making money. You should also avoid YouTube comments. In the future, look at user reviews or threads (like here on GJ) to see what people's experiences are
This post has been translated automatically
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Nobody has liked this post so far
I'll let you know if anything new happens.
Thank you !
This post has been translated automatically
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Nobody has liked this post so far
do not be scared. I see it like Wettibernd & Gamble1:
not all C-casinos are bad, there are some, so many mga-casino can cut off a slice. and among them there are so many black sheep... there is in doubt all the support and all the Malta license in the world nen moist handshake worth (if at all)
wazamba will not sabotage its reputation for free and for no reason. i looked at Casino Guru - is my favorite site when it comes to casino reviews - and there are the with 0 complaints since inception and very well rated (yes, even the gurus are not infallible and reingucken you can not, but have in my opinion the nose in front, which - as far as possible - unbiased casino reviews and assessments. there is also not from the outset everything down, which is not mga. found the so far quite reliable)
This post has been translated automatically
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Liked this post: Sarkasto
And even if some MGA casinos could take a leaf out of , the difference is, if an MGA casino doesn't want to pay out, they still do it according to the "laws". And yes, some of them mercilessly exploit every loophole. Beyond that, though, it gets tricky. However, no Curacao clique has to comply with that. They do it the way they like it. And if Wazamba is what they think they are, they'll get themselves a proper license...
This post has been translated automatically
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Liked this post: v****2, x****Y
hmm - ok, what is wrong with Casino Guru? serious question. "well, everyone has to know for themselves..." is neither a friendly nor a comprehensible statement.
on the subject of mga &" if a MGA casino does not want to pay out, then they still do it according to the "laws""
pardon? what kind of insanity is that? and it's not even true. a pretty big part of the bonus rule violation payout refusals on the part of the casinos, besides the max-bet-rule violations, is the double account accusation (just one example). that doesn't even have to be proven. it doesn't work in most cases. both casino x in malta and casino y in hawaii can make up whatever they want. what laws?
and what loopholes? none are needed because of the lack of laws. and no mga-clitsche has to comply with anything - they just look like the others, how big the damage to their reputation is, if they pull the case of peter s. at the m. now hard as nails, because of 250,000 withheld.
but that's it. there is simply no independent regulation
(you have conjured up a, rabbit out of the hat? - ah, too bad, unfortunately you violated the rabbits-may-not-be-kept-in-honey rule. it's been online in our terms and conditions for at least two hours - and they're always right)
This post has been translated automatically
50€ became 14500€ Curacao license (Wazamba)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically