Whichever competitor it is either has no Provider costs since they are themselves or it's still being lowered
Downward adjustment is better than upward adjustment...
and what's with the smiley behind the statement? Are you happy about the fact that everything is being adjusted downwards?
Your statement above that you'd rather have a higher RTP speaks against this... Perhaps you'd rather not bother with support? Not that your advertising here will backfire...
Downward adjustment is better than upward adjustment...
and what's with the smiley behind the statement? Are you happy that everywhere is corrected downwards?
Your statement above that you'd rather have a higher RTP speaks against this... Perhaps you'd rather not bother with support? Don't let your advertising backfire here...
The pirate is employed by DGGS, which is mainly responsible for the great license offer.
The smiley means that he's probably laughing his head off at the people who voluntarily give their money to the pirate team and who can be legally ripped off in this country with the world's most unfair payout rates 🤑
StarGames and pirate managers will always talk themselves out of it anyway and beat around the bush or blame everything on the high taxes ... That JackpotPiraten can't offer Sizzling Hot at 90% is simply a lie. They could if they wanted to.
Downward adjustment is better than upward adjustment...
and what's with the smiley behind the statement? Are you happy that everywhere is corrected downwards?
Your statement above that you'd rather have a higher RTP speaks against this... Perhaps you'd rather not bother with support? Don't let your advertising backfire here...
This is not an advertisement, this is to hear your feedback and respond to it if possible.
mtorero wrote on 06/18/2024 12:45 PM:
The pirate is employed by DGGS and they are mainly responsible for the great license offer.
The smiley means that he's probably laughing his head off at the people who voluntarily give their money to the pirate team and who can be legally ripped off in this country with the world's most unfair payout rates 🤑
No, I am not responsible for our range of games
hustlehoff wrote on 18.06.2024 at 14:52: StarGames and pirate managers will always talk themselves out of it anyway and beat around the bush or blame everything on the high taxes ... that JackpotPiraten can't offer Sizzling Hot at 90% is simply a lie. They could if they wanted to.
Do you know that StarGames is owned by Greentube and therefore there are no Provider costs for the game?
hustlehoff wrote on 18.06.2024 at 14:54:
Actually, the shitty GGL should make sure that something like this is transparent for the player. Player / consumer protection my ass^^
What does the GGL have to do with the contracts of our game manufacturers and what the fees are?
The GGL is only responsible for checking the games.
After all, the Federal Motor Transport Authority has nothing to do with buying a car either
What does the GGL have to do with contracts of our game manufacturers as the fees are?
The GGL is only responsible for checking the games.
After all, the Federal Motor Transport Authority has nothing to do with buying a car either
To claim here that you have nothing to do with anything and are not responsible for anything is very bold.
Your brand - MER(kur)NOV(omatic) is, as the name suggests, a lobby association that had to act quickly when offline casinos had to close during the Covid lockdown and players tried their luck online.
Of course, they made sure that the gaming conditions and payout ratios could not be more attractive than offline. Why should be clear to everyone, or should I explain?
The pseudo-authority GGL started its work at the same time as your association and of course MERNOV mbH received the first license by chance 🤦
To claim here you have nothing to do with anything and to be responsible for nothing is very brazen.
Your brand - MER(kur)NOV(omatic) is, as the name suggests, a lobby association that had to act quickly when the offline casinos had to close during Covid lockdown times and the players tried their luck online.
Of course, they made sure that the gaming conditions and payout ratios could not be more attractive than offline. Why should be clear to everyone, or should I explain?
The pseudo-authority GGL started its work at the same time as your association and of course MERNOV mbH received the first license by chance 🤦
We are DGGS Deutsche Gesellschaft für Glücksspiel mbH .
We were founded in 2020 and only received our license on 27.04.2022, i.e. after the GGL or the transitional authority began its work in 2021.
But I don't understand what this has to do with our contracts with the game manufacturers to which you are replying
We are DGGS Deutsche Gesellschaft für Glücksspiel mbH .
We were founded in 2020 and only received our license on 27.04.2022, i.e. after the GGL or the transitional authority started its work in 2021.
But I don't understand what this has to do with our contracts with the game manufacturers to which you are replying
I am aware that you are now called DGGS, as I said in the previous post. You have only changed your name from Mernov mbH to DGGS mbH.
That doesn't change the fact that you are 100% owned by Merkur-Novomatic.
Of course, this lobby association was founded before the authority. Without you as the issuer of instructions, no GGL would have been created in this form.
I only mentioned this because you hide behind the authorities when it comes to the inhumane payout ratios.
On the subject of providers:
Greentube also belongs to DGGS and you belong to Novomatic. So why are you making any claims that it would be more expensive for you to offer this Provider? 🤦
The fact that Gauselmann and Novomatic are only founding more and more subsidiaries and that one wants nothing to do with the other in order to conceal the big picture is comparable to René Benko and his Sigma Group in terms of seriousness.
In a country with a Cum-Ex/Warburg Chancellor at the helm, such machinations may lead to success, but no one who works directly or indirectly for these two companies should have a clear conscience.
JackpotPirates wrote on 27/06/2024 07:54:
It is and remains gambling that always leads to loss in the long run.
Our colleagues at StarGames have already mentioned the reason for the low RTP several times:
OASIS costs
Guarantees in the millions
LUGAS costs
Taxes
______
You really can't give a shit like that anymore, you talk about costs that burden you but there's enough money for sponsorship and sporting events, right? Or all the advertising on TV, which is also so cheap.
Dude, I feel so sorry for you that you have so many expenses and THOSE are the only reasons why the rtp is so underground.
i could puke and laugh at the same time.
Just a joke what you guys are doing
it was your lobbying work that made all this possible - it's the dream of your corporate bosses
As if your companies will go bankrupt if the rtp goes up? You are making yourselves ridiculous
You should all be fined a billion euros for ripping off the people like not even the Angels or Bandidos do.
JackpotPirates wrote on 27.06.2024 at 14:51: Why should we correct the RTP downwards if we are not forced to?
To drive you away and stop making money from you?
Makes sense to drive away your customers and not make any more money
Because you or your shareholders always want more and more
If you want you can easily and quickly change everything, but why?
Mr. graf owns almost 7 mlrd Euro head of novomatic and
Mr. gauselmann 2,5 mlrd head of Merkur and even more in the companies themselves
So what are you trying to tell me? That the casinos have made all the money without the influence of politics, I don't know, for me there is no added value, no ying yang, no more balance
Honestly, gambling never had any added value over the new licensed casinos but everything
Because you or your shareholders always want more and more
If you want you can easily and quickly change everything, but why
Mr. graf owns almost 7 mlrd Euro head of novomatic and
Mr. gauselmann 2.5 mlrd head of Merkur and even more in the companies themselves
So what are you trying to tell me? That the casinos have made all the money without the influence of politics, I don't know, for me there is no added value, no ying yang, no more balance
Honestly, gambling never had any added value over the new licensed casinos but everything
A fair casino is also too much to ask for
And because we are unfortunately losing customers we have more?
Unfortunately, this calculation does not add up in any way
And because we unfortunately lose customers as a result, we have more?
Unfortunately, this calculation does not add up in any way
Gambling is not practiced by many, but the people who do it do it intensively and excessively. That's your trick.
This phenomenon also exists with cocaine, a huge turnover but the consumers are few in comparison
Someone deposits money, loses it, then what? Exactly, he goes on and deposits again, without thinking until you lose your money. A small part does that, but that part gives you the money and the wins
The coke junkie runs to the nice cocaine Dealer 5 times a day
It's the same only the coke junkie gets something out of it😜🤣
So what calculation doesn't work?
This 1000€ limit is not there for nothing, the statistics certainly show how morbidly deposited
That can only be the reason why else there's such a law
I'm also fed up, I've had enough to puke and it's nothing personal against you, you just want to earn money and I'm just using this as an outlet, so don't take offense, but every now and then it has to come out, nech
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: bigbig, mtorero
Downward adjustment is better than upward adjustment...
and what's with the smiley behind the statement? Are you happy about the fact that everything is being adjusted downwards?
Your statement above that you'd rather have a higher RTP speaks against this... Perhaps you'd rather not bother with support? Not that your advertising here will backfire...
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: bigbig, hustlehoff, Max_Bet
The pirate is employed by DGGS, which is mainly responsible for the great license offer.
The smiley means that he's probably laughing his head off at the people who voluntarily give their money to the pirate team and who can be legally ripped off in this country with the world's most unfair payout rates 🤑
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: bigbig, RebellYell
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: Max_Bet
Actually, the shitty GGL should make sure that something like this is transparent for the player. Player / consumer protection my ass^^
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: Hanshanshans
This is not an advertisement, this is to hear your feedback and respond to it if possible.
No, I am not responsible for our range of games
Do you know that StarGames is owned by Greentube and therefore there are no Provider costs for the game?
What does the GGL have to do with the contracts of our game manufacturers and what the fees are?
The GGL is only responsible for checking the games.
After all, the Federal Motor Transport Authority has nothing to do with buying a car either
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: bigbig, Max_Bet
To claim here that you have nothing to do with anything and are not responsible for anything is very bold.
Your brand - MER(kur)NOV(omatic) is, as the name suggests, a lobby association that had to act quickly when offline casinos had to close during the Covid lockdown and players tried their luck online.
Of course, they made sure that the gaming conditions and payout ratios could not be more attractive than offline. Why should be clear to everyone, or should I explain?
The pseudo-authority GGL started its work at the same time as your association and of course MERNOV mbH received the first license by chance 🤦
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Nobody has liked this post so far
We are DGGS Deutsche Gesellschaft für Glücksspiel mbH .
We were founded in 2020 and only received our license on 27.04.2022, i.e. after the GGL or the transitional authority began its work in 2021.
But I don't understand what this has to do with our contracts with the game manufacturers to which you are replying
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: bigbig, hustlehoff, Mallpall, Max_Bet
I am aware that you are now called DGGS, as I said in the previous post. You have only changed your name from Mernov mbH to DGGS mbH.
That doesn't change the fact that you are 100% owned by Merkur-Novomatic.
Of course, this lobby association was founded before the authority. Without you as the issuer of instructions, no GGL would have been created in this form.
I only mentioned this because you hide behind the authorities when it comes to the inhumane payout ratios.
On the subject of providers:
Greentube also belongs to DGGS and you belong to Novomatic. So why are you making any claims that it would be more expensive for you to offer this Provider? 🤦
The fact that Gauselmann and Novomatic are only founding more and more subsidiaries and that one wants nothing to do with the other in order to conceal the big picture is comparable to René Benko and his Sigma Group in terms of seriousness.
In a country with a Cum-Ex/Warburg Chancellor at the helm, such machinations may lead to success, but no one who works directly or indirectly for these two companies should have a clear conscience.
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: bigbig, Max_Bet, Saphira
taskforce meeting at Gauselmann Castle
dear JackpotPirates Casino Manager were you also at this meeting?
Knights of the Round Table
five million euros to the town of Lübbecke Money well spent
Edit: Font color adjusted by Counter
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: CaNna09, hustlehoff, Malganes, Max_Bet
It is and remains gambling that always leads to loss in the long run.
Our colleagues at StarGames have already mentioned the reason for the low RTP several times:
OASIS costs
Guarantees in the millions
LUGAS costs
Taxes
______
You really can't give a shit like that anymore, you talk about costs that burden you but there's enough money for sponsorship and sporting events, right? Or all the advertising on TV, which is also so cheap.
Dude, I feel so sorry for you that you have so many expenses and THOSE are the only reasons why the rtp is so underground.
i could puke and laugh at the same time.
Just a joke what you guys are doing
it was your lobbying work that made all this possible - it's the dream of your corporate bosses
As if your companies will go bankrupt if the rtp goes up? You are making yourselves ridiculous
You should all be fined a billion euros for ripping off the people like not even the Angels or Bandidos do.
Big thumbs down for all of you
Bye Bye😁
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Nobody has liked this post so far
To drive you away and stop making money from you?
It makes sense to drive away your customers and stop making money
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Nobody has liked this post so far
Because you or your shareholders always want more and more
If you want you can easily and quickly change everything, but why?
Mr. graf owns almost 7 mlrd Euro head of novomatic and
Mr. gauselmann 2,5 mlrd head of Merkur and even more in the companies themselves
So what are you trying to tell me? That the casinos have made all the money without the influence of politics, I don't know, for me there is no added value, no ying yang, no more balance
Honestly, gambling never had any added value over the new licensed casinos but everything
A fair casino is also too much to ask for
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Nobody has liked this post so far
And because we are unfortunately losing customers we have more?
Unfortunately, this calculation does not add up in any way
This post has been translated automatically
Feedback topic JackpotPirates and BingBong
Liked this post: Max_Bet
Gambling is not practiced by many, but the people who do it do it intensively and excessively. That's your trick.
This phenomenon also exists with cocaine, a huge turnover but the consumers are few in comparison
Someone deposits money, loses it, then what? Exactly, he goes on and deposits again, without thinking until you lose your money. A small part does that, but that part gives you the money and the wins
The coke junkie runs to the nice cocaine Dealer 5 times a day
It's the same only the coke junkie gets something out of it😜🤣
So what calculation doesn't work?
This 1000€ limit is not there for nothing, the statistics certainly show how morbidly deposited
That can only be the reason why else there's such a law
I'm also fed up, I've had enough to puke and it's nothing personal against you, you just want to earn money and I'm just using this as an outlet, so don't take offense, but every now and then it has to come out, nech
This post has been translated automatically