Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Federal states want to monitor gamblers (Page 3)

Topic created on 13th Nov. 2019 | Page: 3 of 4 | Answers: 33 | Views: 9,825
Stromberg
Legend
Zockertyp89 wrote on 11/14/2019 08:36 AM
I had already asked in another thread:

Can someone show me something official that confirms that gambling is legal in Germany due to EU law ?

That was the same thread, one page before
And I do not think who can

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Stromberg wrote on 11/14/2019 08:52 PM
That was the same thread, one page before
And I don't think who can.

It's still early in the morning after all. 😁😂

This post has been translated automatically

Loco187
Amateur
Zockertyp89 wrote on 13/11/2019 at 20:25
Can anyone actually show me something official that confirms that casinos are legal in Germany or the EU according to EU law ?

What the casinos stubbornly refer to is the following:

By the prohibition of Online Casinos from Germany, the providers on other EU states such as Malta or Gibraltar from. where online gambling is regulated by law down to the smallest detail receive so a gambling license. Due to the membership of these states in the EU, European law (which is superior to German law) stipulates in this case that a Provider of goods and services on the Internet, if it has a valid license in one member state, may also operate without obstacles in all other member states of the European un ion. Thus, if the German state were to take legal action against online casino offers for Germany and German gamblers, it would face countless lawsuits in the EU Court of Justice, which players and casinos would surely win.

But in which code of law this is to be found and whether the casinos are really in the right with it, I have no idea. I am also not a lawyer. In any case, they argue with the EU right to " freedom of services ." I'm sure google can tell you more.


This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Loco187 wrote at 09:18 on 14 Nov 2019
What the casinos are stubbornly referring to is this:

By the prohibition of Online Casinos from Germany, the providers to other EU states such as Malta or Gibraltar from. where online gambling is regulated by law down to the smallest detail receive so a gambling license. Due to the membership of these states in the EU, European law (which is superior to German law) stipulates in this case that a Provider of goods and services on the Internet, if it has a valid license in one member state, may also operate without obstacles in all other member states of the European un ion. Thus, if the German state were to take legal action against online casino offers for Germany and German gamblers, it would face countless lawsuits in the EU Court of Justice, which players and casinos would surely win.

But in which code of law this is to be found and whether the casinos are really in the right with it, I have no idea. I am also not a lawyer. In any case, they argue with the EU right to " freedom of services ." I'm sure google can tell you more.



However, gambling is a matter for the states. Each state can regulate this itself.

Furthermore, this also means that no German licensing is necessary in the end, since everything seems to be regulated by EU law anyway. One would actually only need to maintain the status quo.

This post has been translated automatically

Jojuaax3
Rookie
Zockertyp89 wrote on 11/14/2019 09:39 AM
However, gambling is up to the states. Each state can regulate it themselves.

Furthermore, this also means that in the end no German licensing is necessary, since everything seems to be regulated by EU law anyway. One would actually only need to maintain the status quo.

Well, I believe that something will still change, after all, it is also about tax revenues. Per year in Germany alone about 1.76mrd € are converted with Online Casinos (as of 2017, with a strong upward trend). That now stood to run past the state.
The state would probably like to participate in the sales of the casinos
Especially since the money would flow directly into the coffers of the states, since gambling is a state matter.

For me, the whole thing is just a matter of time until we have our own regulation (again).

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie
Elite
Every normal thinking person would see it that way. So much coal that the state loses through non-existent regulation.
But that the government sometimes does not think rationally for ideological reasons, you can see, among other things, the non-legalization of cannabis.
Here, too, tens of billions that the state prefers to leave to the black market instead of collecting them.

This post has been translated automatically

Klabisto
Experienced
Christoph wrote on 14.11.2019 at 08:45: Matthias once showed me the Bild article. I must confess that it does not really contain anything new. That a monthly limit for sports betting is coming, is at the latest known since March 2019, but was also before part of the gambling treaty (but was never enforced, because the award of the 20 sports betting licenses was stopped).

And that a "limit monitoring file" must then be introduced, in which the necessary data is stored, is actually only logical

According to the bill, the first name, last name, birth name, birthday, place of residence, the amount of the Deposit limit set by the player, the date the limit was set, the amount and date of the deposits made and the total amount of the deposits will be stored there.

I understand that it is a lot of data and it is certainly not unproblematic for privacy reasons either. It is also questionable whether the system is so secure that the data cannot be accessed by third parties. With regard to welfare recipients, students (Bafög) and debtors, it is questionable for me so far whether the data may be forwarded to the relevant authorities - I have not read anything about this so far.

How else would the establishment of cross-provider limits be accomplished? I don't want to defend the bill, but some users had described here again and again that they would welcome blocks for all providers and also limits for all providers, because now they can simply go to another gambling Provider without limit settings and continue gambling there.

Surely the law will rather deter high rollers, but so far it is a draft that is being discussed, maybe some bookmakers will still make sure that there can be exceptions


Thanks for the information. That will be the end of gambling for me if it gets that far. This is total surveillance. Well... we will be there soon anyway. Poor Germany.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Jojuaax3 wrote on 11/14/2019 10:22 AM
Well, I think that something will still change, after all, it's also about tax revenue. Per year in Germany alone about 1.76mrd € are turned over with Online Casinos (as of 2017, with a strong upward trend). That now stood to run past the state.
The state would probably like to participate in the sales of the casinos
Especially since the money would flow directly into the coffers of the states, since gambling is a state matter.

For me, the whole thing is just a matter of time until we have our own regulation (again).

As far as I know, the casinos do pay taxes in Germany

This post has been translated automatically

TheSunMan
Rookie
Monitoring is the wrong approach. However, I would welcome a central regulation of the set limits/breaks and exclusions. It simply doesn't help at all if every casino sets limits for itself. If I exclude myself at Casino X, then I can still continue to gamble at thousands of others Just as stupid as the local Spielos - although I do not think that a real gambler does not voluntarily go to Spielos

Let them just abolish the money, that's the cause of all these problems ;D

This post has been translated automatically

Mo1985
Amateur
If Germany licenses a few Online Casinos, all others that do not have a license are simply banned.

Anyone who gambles there is then liable to prosecution and will be sanctioned accordingly for illegal gambling.

It's about time that the state does something here and above all prohibits penniless people from playing.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Dec. 2024 at 08:50 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately