Online Casinos in general: Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe (Page 2)

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

1. We get requests from Online Casinos that want to be listed with us.We look at the casinos, research and if we find nothing seriously negative and the licenses fit, then we respond


2. We name our price, which we want to have per player.


3. If the casino is willing to pay our price (which is the rule, since our prices are lower than those of affilaites of comparable size), we test it ourselves with an account that does not suggest GambleJoe. In other words, the casino usually does not know that someone from GambleJoe is testing the casino.


4. Then we record the casino and publish a test report as soon as possible. Our copywriter may and should publish his own opinion and experience uncensored in this test.


5. Since we can have a good but also a bad day and we can also overlook deficiencies, our test report must not and cannot always reflect reality. So that our visitors (not every visitor is a member here) can better assess a casino, we also have user reviews, which - with very few exceptions - are also not censored.


6. Our members and visitors can then form a picture of the casino based on our ratings and the ratings of the users and decide whether they want to play there or not.

• A manager from Videoslots wrote to me saying that he left Videoslots because he was looking for new challenges. He said Videoslots is still a top casino but it has become so gigantic and rigid that he can no longer contribute and develop freely as he used to.

• The manager said that he now works at Mobilt Ltd. and whether FortuneLegend Casino could be interesting for us.

• I looked at the site, saw the following and my interest was piqued

• I gave the casino to Christoph and it was tested.


• Christoph told me that the casino has some technical shortcomings.


• I spoke with the former Videoslots manager. I told him that the Sloagan "no bonus, no problems" leaves a very positive impression on me and I would like to see it in our comparison. However, I don't advise it until the technical issues are fixed. We can record it but the community will surely tear you apart and that won't be a good start.


• The manager told me that he will address the issues and get in touch with Matthias as soon as they are fixed.


• The casino has been included and unfortunately it looks like there are still problems.

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel wrote on 03/09/2019 at 04:05: I understand and accept your opinions, as well as Christoph's opinion, which he can freely express here - the review did not turn out very well, after all. But what bothers me is your mentality. You really notice how many here are looking for a reason to criticize us all the time. Please loosen up a bit.

Whoever meets the minimum requirements can be accepted by us - even if the casino is not perfect. Any casino that can prove an EU license and we assume that this casino will not refuse payouts without reason or other serious messes will occur, can basically be accepted by us.

We proceed as follows:

1. We get requests from Online Casinos that want to be listed with us.We look at the casinos, research and if we find nothing seriously negative and the licenses fit, then we respond


2. We name our price, which we want to have per player.


3. If the casino is willing to pay our price (which is the rule, since our prices are lower than those of affilaites of comparable size), we test it ourselves with an account that does not suggest GambleJoe. In other words, the casino usually does not know that someone from GambleJoe is testing the casino.


4. Then we record the casino and publish a test report as soon as possible. Our copywriter may and should publish his own opinion and experience uncensored in this test.


5. Since we can have a good but also a bad day and we can also overlook deficiencies, our test report must not and cannot always reflect reality. So that our visitors (not every visitor is a member here) can better assess a casino, we also have user reviews, which - with very few exceptions - are also not censored.


6. Our members and visitors can then form a picture of the casino based on our ratings and the ratings of the users and decide whether they want to play there or not.

Of course, we do not accept casinos that we know from the beginning are risky for us, our visitors or members due to their license or past behavior. However, any casino that does not possess these negative characteristics at the time of admission can be admitted in principle.

I personally think that this is a good thing. If we would only include perfect casinos, then we would only have a handful of casinos. If we only included perfect providers, then there would be almost exclusively positive reviews and this leads to torches and pitchforks, because then the accusation would come that we write reviews ourselves and everything is fake

Since there are very few German-language portals where the users themselves have their say, potential customers would also have little opportunity to inform themselves about a particular casino. If FortuneLegend turns out to be bad in the long run, then the reviews on our site will save potential customers frustration and hassle.

Someone asked why we don't have some well-known casinos in our comparison. Well, the reason for this is sometimes many of our users who use every opportunity to unpack torches and pitchforks. Many casinos also do not want to be listed in such an environment. Many casinos do not like our "marketing". When I published the guide articles back then, two casinos jumped off and didn't want to work with us anymore, because this could have a deterrent effect. In fact, there are always users (mostly very young players who are at the beginning of their gaming career) who have stopped gambling because of us. There are not many but still ...

Also the emergence of a community in the German-speaking area was not seen with pleasure. A casino, which is on our greylist, advised us not to let the players have their say: A bad idea, we were told. Our way was not the easiest and partly risky. In the short and medium term, our competitors passed us financially. We drove an old VW Golf, while our competitors started with sports cars and had a head start with them.

How did FortuneLegends get started?

The whole thing went as follows:

• A manager from Videoslots wrote to me saying that he left Videoslots because he was looking for new challenges. He said that Videoslots is still a top casino, but it has become so huge that he can no longer contribute and develop freely as he used to.

• The manager said that he now works at Mobilt Ltd. and whether FortuneLegend Casino could be interesting for us.

• I looked at the site, saw the following and my interest was piqued

Image source: FortuneLegends.com

• I gave the casino to Christoph and it was tested.


• Christoph told me that the casino has some technical shortcomings.


• I spoke with the former Videoslots manager. I told him that the Sloagan "no bonus, no problems" leaves a very positive impression on me and I would like to see it in our comparison. However, I don't advise it until the technical issues are fixed. We can record it but the community will surely tear you apart and that won't be a good start.


• The manager told me that he will address the issues and get in touch with Matthias as soon as they are fixed.


• The casino has been included and unfortunately it looks like there are still problems.

The casino is run by a relatively young (in the gambling industry) company. However, I definitely see potential, as I believe to see an honest and trustworthy foundation. Transparency and trustworthiness are for me personally the most important characteristics of a good casino and that's why it was included. I can be wrong of course but I think that this casino basically deserves a chance and I hope that in the future this will develop into a top casino a la Videoslots, SlotsMillion, sunmaker, sunnyplayer (**). And if it doesn't, then it will just go down as a NoName.

Although I see potential, we have written and published an honest review (which unfortunately could not be positive). Of course, you can also rate the casino objectively (positively or negatively), as long as you have already had experiences there. However, we do not force you to play there and we do not see you as a guinea pig either!

(**) For guests and new community members: I mean casinos that do not have "traps" like the 5€ Maxbet rule for Bonuses in their terms and conditions - unfortunately a rarity in this industry. Such bonus rules lead, especially with inexperienced players, again and again to the cancellation of wins or the refusal of payouts. Unfortunately, the law allows such terms and conditions and therefore the market must eliminate this problem - I try to do this by deliberately pushing casinos that do not have such rules or these rules are implemented so that inexperienced players can not accidentally violate them.

This post has been translated automatically

robby811 wrote at 04:30 on 2019-09-03
Point 3 and 4 you have listed twice or are the same

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Zockertyp89 wrote on 02/09/2019 at 19:01: So we should pay the casino money and then still give feedback to improve? I find honestly more than Grenzwertig of you...

As mentioned: With e.g. a no-deposit bonus, that would have been something else. So I find that very brazen.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically