Online Casinos in general: Do you get preferential treatment as a new player? (Page 6)

Sigura43 wrote on 07/09/2018 at 22:47: Correct ! And with correct I remain that is designed exactly who wins how much, or loses . For this I have experienced too much strange in many casino's. Sometimes you come across honest. But actually you are appendage of the Casino's. Have all times an ass in the pants, and be honest with yourself. That is character

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel wrote on 07/09/2018 at 13:19: You may not be able to prove anything but maybe experience and common sense will help:

1. Why manipulate when you can already make such immense wins with an AQ of about 95%? 5% house edge does not mean that players Deposit 10.000€ and get 9.500€ out as winnings to the bank account (many still do not understand this). It just means that the casino earns 5% of the stake on the long-term average. Don't you understand how much money that is? If I play for an hour on 1€, then I make 0,05€ loss per spin. I make 20 spins per minute and per hour of play 1,200 spins where if I was lucky on average in the hour I lose 1,200 * 0.05€ = 60€. If I lose only 40€ in the hour, then I am already a win!!! Why the hell do I have to manipulate, why take any risks?

The whole thing is based on probability , why don't you understand that? If I flip a coin 10,000x, the end result will be that 5,000x heads and 5,000x tails came. The less I flip, the more the final result will deviate from the probability. If I flip the coin only 10x it can well be that I get 9x heads and only 1x tails. But in the long run it balances out. This is how machines work, a very simple story.

Only there are significantly more combination possibilities with Slot machines and there are slots where I can pay 10,000x and more of my bet AND you still have all the small intermediate winnings that you gamble away again, which count towards the payout ratio. I could develop a game with an AQ of 99%, where no player ever gets into the plus, but only loses. And with every 1€ spin exactly 1 cent loss - never a win - and the slot would still have an AQ of 99%.

2. Why do bad or shoddy Online Casinos constantly look for reasons not to pay out when the wins are high, if everything is rigged anyway? Why upset customers, who then make the reputation of the casino publicly bad (and potential rip-off victims deterred), if the wins are more or less planned anyway. That simply makes no sense! Such cases can only occur when the casinos themselves do not know when and where the next win will come.

3. Why should the game manufacturers (who earn the most money in this game), provide the online casinos with the software? There are so many bad online casinos. If I, as a game manufacturer, were to give the online casinos full control over my software, then there would be a high Risk that some casinos would manipulate my slots, which would then reduce my revenue (since I get paid on net revenue or per spin by the casinos.) In addition, I expose myself to the risk that my games will be played less and thus the competition will eat me.
If someone is manipulating, it is the game manufacturers and not the individual online casinos, which are a very small number in this game.

4. Why are there even cases of players who are in the plus in online casinos? Why are there cases of players who deposit little but still win a high 5-digit or now and then even 6-digit amount? Why is that if everything is rigged? I mean the cases there are yes and these appear here in the forum in the form of complaints when the casino (mostly Wunderino) does not want to pay or the player has screwed up and the casino justifiably closes the account. But there are also players who win big and don't complain because they just got the win. Satisfied people do not complain. All planned and controlled by the Maltese mafia?

I mean I think it is good (from an economic point of view) that many players believe in these conspiracies. Such players constantly change casinos and with our commission model we profit from it, if players constantly change the casinos. Actually, I would have to support such conspiracies but it is not the truth and it can not be the truth if you put your frustration aside and think about it properly and objectively.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel wrote on 07/09/2018 at 21:26
Suppose I had developed Book of Dead and suppose Book of Dead has an AQ of 95%. Then I could take out some explorer symbols on the reels, but add some small symbols on the reels instead. I could calculate this so that the probability of 5 explorers is even smaller than it already is, but the game pays out several smaller wins, which the players usually gamble away again. Then the players have the feeling that the AQ of 95% cannot be any more. But the AQ remains the same, only now players can play longer than before, but big hits become rarer.
first what I want to say with it. I mean I'm not advertising gambling here - this is rather relentless education and "anti-advertising".

This post has been translated automatically

Tropper wrote on 07/09/2018 at 22:01: No, not for a long time. Such "constellations" were always different after a few months. I only found the video with the 3 explorers, which was also from kingtut. At that time there was one which showed the constellation and with commentary


Have just searched and found:


It was not a fake but the pure truth.
I could not believe it myself but it worked!
Is from Kingtut


greetings

PS: I do not want to encourage anyone to gamble, it is unfortunately old cheese!!!

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically