-
Langhans_innen, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 10:07 am CET
-
TennisFreak, on 14th Sep. 2024 at 07:52 pm CEST
-
Beccyt69, today at 01:10 am CET
-
frapi07, today at 12:14 am CET
-
gamble1, today at 12:06 am CET
-
Latiluck, yesterday at 11:41 pm CET
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 10:19 pm CET
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 10:17 pm CET
-
Patizi, yesterday at 09:44 pm CET
-
frapi07, yesterday at 08:02 pm CET
-
bigbig, yesterday at 07:59 pm CET
-
danny005, yesterday at 06:07 pm CET
-
Kleinkariert, yesterday at 03:29 pm CET
-
Hanshanshans, yesterday at 03:12 pm CET
-
frapi07, yesterday at 11:17 am CET
-
Jasonknz878, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 11:37 pm CET
-
Jay88, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 07:35 pm CET
-
Pat1991, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 06:53 pm CET
-
Julian, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 06:51 pm CET
-
fischermann, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 08:41 am CET
-
Tanja1987, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 07:44 am CET
-
Donnie, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 02:53 pm CET
-
Casinonutzer1307, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 02:15 pm CET
-
frapi07, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 12:59 pm CET
-
Stromberg, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 09:15 am CET
-
frapi07, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 02:45 am CET
Direct complaint against entire casino group (Curacao license)?
Nobody has liked this post so far
At Guru there are countless cases where Curacaos also return funds when it is clearly Gambling addiction and the casino allowed deposits after a ban for gambling addiction.
This post has been translated automatically
Direct complaint against entire casino group (Curacao license)?
Nobody has liked this post so far
The numbers but usually only when they just feel like it Curacao is not tangible and the authority does not give a shit because it is known for years how to deal with player complaints namely not at all and if at all times an answer comes it was the first and last usually think the others would like to point here
Therefore, I would say if the TE can prove everything "AND THE CASINO JUST DANACH IST" then his chances are good because if the casino has no buck 20 Aff pages on the hammering that does not juckt the and the authority also not
This post has been translated automatically
Direct complaint against entire casino group (Curacao license)?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, that's exactly how it is. Nobody denies that. But to say in advance that it is useless anyway is just wrong. There are many cases in which they pay for Gambling addiction, because pretty much every aff site decides in the player's favor and it is even theoretically stated in the license agreement.
Only Guru are the biggest xxxx. They even decide against the player, even if the casino shows willingness to pay. Nevertheless, it can bring what to make there ne complaint, because many casinos then immediately respond to the complaint with the fact that they pay. However, if the casino refuses to pay, you can be sure that Guru will stick to the casino, no matter what evidence you have. I know a case where a player had several screenshots of the gambling ban, even as he told the VIP support about it.
In that case, the casino had objected and Guru then pulled things out of his fingers that were no longer nice. They then argued that the account had been blocked because of gambling addiction, but since you had asked for a bonus beforehand, this was not really to be taken seriously. They also like to ignore evidence and sometimes even screw the players more than the casinos themselves.
This post has been translated automatically
Direct complaint against entire casino group (Curacao license)?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically