People are always jealous of the supposedly "easy life" or envious of these people. Even if one denies it. If it were not so, why go then almost all lottery games with jackpots?
I can still remember when I was 20. Shortly before that my apprenticeship company closed its doors. The year of my life. I registered for a year unemployed. We gambled for our lives in a big Czech casino and won, won, won. Tens of thousands of euros. After a short time, the casino declared us "VIPs" and also offered us overnight accommodations, including nice barmaids
That was a year long party, gambling and F**** what the stuff held. For this, everyone, really everyone, just hated us
I never understood that, and I didn't really care at the time. I was then still 6 months on a "small" world trip and then I went back to work
People are just like that when some get served too easy
Nevertheless, to the TE: Look for you nen job and zock not on state aid senseless around, brings you in the long run not further
The civil servants do not stand in the gambling halls and calculate all the payouts from the welfare recipients. Just because they have it in black and white, they do not have the right to charge me only minus.
It came so suddenly, if I had known before, then I would not have played with my bank account.
Bonushunter77 wrote on 18.03.2021 at 23:01: The officials also do not stand in the arcades and calculate all payouts from the welfare recipients. Just because they have it in black and white doesn't give them the right to charge me only minus.
It came so suddenly, if I had known before, then I would not have played with my bank account.
Take refuge in the disability pension, there you will no longer be moped. But with social welfare, the authorities really get on your nerves.
Find that honestly very hard but you should already know if you get money from the state. When we were young, a colleague has therefore played on the name and banks of the parents and clarified with them
You never know why the person needs help from the state. Find that of course also not right with the money then to gamble but that is of course each his business
Find that it is monitored in itself a good thing. The state offers help (even if it sometimes goes to the wrong) and the money is then spent on the casino so so bad can one then probably not go
Would do that in the future simply about e-wallets or about good acquaintances. Or just leave it because through casino you do not get more money. Unless you have good luck 😁
Mrdripdoc wrote on 18.03.2021 at 23:54: Find the honestly very hard but you should already know if you draw money from the state. When we were young a colleague has therefore played about the name and banks of the parents and clarified that with them
You never know why the person needs help from the state. Find that of course also not right with the money then to gamble but that is of course each his business
Find that it is monitored in itself a good thing. The state offers help (even if it sometimes goes to the wrong) and the money is then spent on the casino so so bad can one then probably not go
Would do that in the future simply about e-wallets or about good acquaintances. Or just leave it because through casino you do not get more money. Unless you have good luck 😁
Nevertheless, all the best.
Thank you! Such an open dialogue opens up other perspectives.
Whether I find it now good or not that does nothing to the thing, but everyone is to make with the provided money what he wants. I know enough people who if everything runs "normal" on the 29th of their social penny about 400 euros in the pub to immediately write a new cap. Or the full Daddelbuden at the end of the month --- why probably? Strictly speaking, a large part of the money goes back to where it came from.
Falko wrote on 03/18/2021 at 23:08
Take refuge in the disability pension, there you are no longer moppt. But with social welfare, there go the authorities a really right aufn nerv.
wettibernd wrote on 19.03.2021 at 09:36 clock: Whether I find it now good or not that does not matter, but everyone should do with the money provided what he wants. I know enough people who if everything runs "normal" on the 29th of their social penny about 400 euros in the pub to immediately write a new cap. Or the full Daddelbuden at the end of the month --- why probably? Strictly speaking, a large part of the money goes back to where it came from.
I see it with H4 somewhat more critically than with ALG1. In other countries, this form of social benefit does not even exist, and it should clearly serve your basic life security. This is not only legally but also morally absolutely reprehensible, because with it one kicks above all humans before the head, who do not have the luck to be able to draw such social security benefits and in poverty, homelessness and hunger must live.
I know that these comparisons are somewhat limp and to make on moral apostle is also not exactly the right way. At the moment when the application for social benefits is approved, the recipient should know for himself how to manage with the available amount and how to make a living with it. But it just does not serve the gamble, that is simply so and every common sense should be clear. Every consequence from this on the part of the offices is absolutely correct and also not contestable
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Debts due to casinos.
19th Mar. 2021, at 10:58 am CET#52
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
When do cash winnings have to be reported to the job center?
In Germany, one-off casino and lottery winnings are generally not considered taxable income. However, in the case of Hartz IV benefit recipients, there is a reporting obligation for wins made in the lottery and in casinos. Online Casinos are not exempt from this.
The legislator wants to ensure by the measures that only needy applicants receive necessary social benefits. If the beneficiary does not comply with his or her reporting obligation, sanctions in the form of fines or imprisonment may be imposed. As a general rule, the reported win is chargeable.
This means that benefits paid can be reclaimed by the job center. A reduction or cancellation may also be considered, depending on the amount of the win. The situation may be different if non-cash prizes are won. What counts here is whether the prize represents "realizable assets." A win, for example, of a car, does not necessarily have to lead to a deduction from Hartz IV. This would only be the case if the car were sold.
-- source link to the competition has been removed --
Conclusion: ass card, stop gambling or gamble without getting caught
Debts due to casinos.
Nobody has liked this post so far
You could have just said "yes".
This post has been translated automatically
Debts due to casinos.
Liked this post: NoSkill_NoKill, Saphira
I can still remember when I was 20. Shortly before that my apprenticeship company closed its doors. The year of my life. I registered for a year unemployed. We gambled for our lives in a big Czech casino and won, won, won. Tens of thousands of euros. After a short time, the casino declared us "VIPs" and also offered us overnight accommodations, including nice barmaids
That was a year long party, gambling and F**** what the stuff held. For this, everyone, really everyone, just hated us
I never understood that, and I didn't really care at the time. I was then still 6 months on a "small" world trip and then I went back to work
People are just like that when some get served too easy
Nevertheless, to the TE: Look for you nen job and zock not on state aid senseless around, brings you in the long run not further
This post has been translated automatically
Debts due to casinos.
Liked this post: CashOut, NoSkill_NoKill
It came so suddenly, if I had known before, then I would not have played with my bank account.
This post has been translated automatically
Debts due to casinos.
Liked this post: CashOut, NoSkill_NoKill, Spielheld
Take refuge in the disability pension, there you will no longer be moped. But with social welfare, the authorities really get on your nerves.
This post has been translated automatically
Debts due to casinos.
Liked this post: NoSkill_NoKill
You never know why the person needs help from the state. Find that of course also not right with the money then to gamble but that is of course each his business
Find that it is monitored in itself a good thing. The state offers help (even if it sometimes goes to the wrong) and the money is then spent on the casino so so bad can one then probably not go
Would do that in the future simply about e-wallets or about good acquaintances. Or just leave it because through casino you do not get more money. Unless you have good luck 😁
Nevertheless, all the best
This post has been translated automatically
Debts due to casinos.
Liked this post: NoSkill_NoKill
Thank you! Such an open dialogue opens up other perspectives.
This post has been translated automatically
Debts due to casinos.
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Debts due to casinos.
Nobody has liked this post so far
But it is not that simple.
This post has been translated automatically
Debts due to casinos.
Liked this post: Klabisto, Saphira
I see it with H4 somewhat more critically than with ALG1. In other countries, this form of social benefit does not even exist, and it should clearly serve your basic life security. This is not only legally but also morally absolutely reprehensible, because with it one kicks above all humans before the head, who do not have the luck to be able to draw such social security benefits and in poverty, homelessness and hunger must live.
I know that these comparisons are somewhat limp and to make on moral apostle is also not exactly the right way. At the moment when the application for social benefits is approved, the recipient should know for himself how to manage with the available amount and how to make a living with it. But it just does not serve the gamble, that is simply so and every common sense should be clear. Every consequence from this on the part of the offices is absolutely correct and also not contestable
This post has been translated automatically
Debts due to casinos.
Nobody has liked this post so far
In Germany, one-off casino and lottery winnings are generally not considered taxable income. However, in the case of Hartz IV benefit recipients, there is a reporting obligation for wins made in the lottery and in casinos. Online Casinos are not exempt from this.
The legislator wants to ensure by the measures that only needy applicants receive necessary social benefits. If the beneficiary does not comply with his or her reporting obligation, sanctions in the form of fines or imprisonment may be imposed. As a general rule, the reported win is chargeable.
This means that benefits paid can be reclaimed by the job center. A reduction or cancellation may also be considered, depending on the amount of the win. The situation may be different if non-cash prizes are won. What counts here is whether the prize represents "realizable assets." A win, for example, of a car, does not necessarily have to lead to a deduction from Hartz IV. This would only be the case if the car were sold.
-- source link to the competition has been removed --
Conclusion: ass card, stop gambling or gamble without getting caught
This post has been translated automatically