Online Casinos in general: Class action AdvoFin - experiences? (Page 8)

Tribeholz wrote on 01/20/2021 at 10:48 AM
But I also know of someone who got their coals back

He didn't make a big fuss about it, but as I understood it, he was first in therapy, then in an addiction group and didn't relapse for a year - and then he got his money back

But this was used to settle old debts.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Klabisto wrote on 20.01.2021 at 15:20: I went times on the Internet site, because me then nevertheless interested...... .
So this is not only for Austrians, but also for Germans
Only with certain casino's (in which I, by the way, do not play) is sued.
The minimum loss is 10.000,00 EUR at ONE Provider (minus the wins mind you).
37% of the proceeds is also not a pittance (but still more than half of the loss - to have or not to have.....)
Thanks, I'm out of there....

However, I can absolutely understand people who meet the above criteria and want to get at least some of the losses back

The question remains though... will they keep gambling?

This post has been translated automatically

Klabisto wrote on 20.01.2021 at 15:20: I went times on the Internet site, because me then nevertheless interested...... .
So this is not only for Austrians, but also for Germans
Only at certain casino's (in which I, by the way, do not play) is sued.
The minimum loss is 10.000,00 EUR at ONE Provider (minus the wins mind you).
37% of the proceeds is also not a pittance (but still more than half of the loss - to have or not to have.....)
Thanks, I'm out of there....

However, I can absolutely understand people who meet the above criteria and want to get at least some of the losses back

The question remains though... will they keep gambling?

This post has been translated automatically

stevbuam wrote on 06.01.2021 at 12:11 pm: servus avicii

I am also Austrian and play for about 10 years in various large Online Casinos

That you attach yourself to this class action suit I find totally brave and awesome!

These OC giants should be asked to pay once properly anyway!

I find that all these negative contributions here, these are very envious and each of these has probably already gambled away a 5 digit amount himself!

Why I say that is because all these clever people are registered here in this forum, so these are for me all addicted to gambling and in the end not as great and super as they think!

Please keep me informed about the lawsuit!

thank you Best regards stevbuam

Edit: Provocations against the community removed

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1 wrote on 01/21/2021 at 01:24 PM
Why always all those who lose a lot or do not speak well of such behavior are called frustrated gambling addicts I do not quite understand

I mean if someone is willing to spend so much you can still be happy even if it's gone that's called investing money for hobbies and one buys railroads the other collects things and still another prefers to gamble with it

You are but the people who spend money and then crying all run to daddy state and all want to sue so you apparently have a gambling problem and not the people who continue to participate nicely and politely here on the subject of casino

And why should someone be jealous when I need money I just do not gamble so simple is that I do not need to be jealous when someone makes himself small publicly and his weaknesses outwardly carries

I understand it fully and completely if a casino in any form stupid things makes the coal back to demand but ask yourselves really times the question would you also with 100k win the money would have given if the casino had said

Mr./Mrs. XYZ unfortunately there is no money from us we know they have used the service but what should we say we are unfortunately addicted to gambling or it is purely theoretically considered forbidden for them from Austria to play therefore gibts nix

Would someone have done that ? ... . NO no one would have made then here would be the next thread with MIMIMI Casino XYZ does not pay the money

And please explain to me why these people have more rights than the people who have to pay their employees

This post has been translated automatically

Hidaruma wrote on 20/01/2021 at 16:26

What exactly can you understand? They go here and gamble away 5-digit sums and then have the audacity to sue the providers. This is the lowest drawer. Stupidity is rewarded and that can't be

This post has been translated automatically

Jokerboy wrote on 20/01/2021 at 16:29
I also think this needs to be conditional. Similar to a suspended sentence where you get a helper at your side. After all, it's not to be underestimated when someone completely sells off their financial resources and ends up with nothing or a lot of debt. The danger is too great that this person will make the same mistake again
A period of 3 - 5 years under control, I think in these cases it makes sense.

This post has been translated automatically

Klabisto wrote on 21.01.2021 at 13:58

I'm going to assume that AdvoFin is not concerned about the gambling addicts, but only about their 37%....

This post has been translated automatically

Klabisto wrote on 01/21/2021 at 1:55 pm
What are you bluffing me about?
I can understand it, YOU can't. Period.

This post has been translated automatically