Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: [Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player (Page 20)

Topic created on 20th Jan. 2020 | Page: 20 of 27 | Answers: 262 | Views: 68,045
Born4Nothing
Rookie

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

25th May. 2020, at 03:22 pm CEST#194
1 Like

Liked this post: Avatar von RebellYell RebellYell
RebellYell
Top Member

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

26th May. 2020, at 11:15 pm CEST#195
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/ndr/gluecksspiel-visa-101.html


"The Ministry communicated on inquiry of the NDR that one was up-to-date with 19 payment service providers in the discussion about it. Around which companies it concerned, a speaker did not want to communicate. Nine of them had already stopped payments to online casinos.

Authorities put pressure on service providers

Payment service providers that do not voluntarily exit the market are threatened by the authorities with a ban. Last year, the authority issued such a prohibition to the Provider PayPal, whereupon the company exited the online casino market in Germany."



Well there probably soon further payment service providers will fall away...

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

27th May. 2020, at 01:03 am CEST#196
1 Like

Liked this post: Anonym
RebellYell wrote on 05/26/2020 at 23:15: https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/ndr/gluecksspiel-visa-101.html


"The ministry communicated on inquiry of the NDR with the fact that one was up-to-date with 19 payment service providers in the discussion over it. Around which companies it concerned, a speaker did not want to communicate. Nine of them had already stopped payments to online casinos.

Authorities put pressure on service providers

Payment service providers that do not voluntarily exit the market are threatened by the authorities with a ban. Last year, the authority issued such a prohibition to the Provider PayPal, whereupon the company exited the online casino market in Germany."



Well there probably soon more payment service providers will fall away...

Strange article. Actually one could exert legal pressure, but that is not mentioned in the article even rudimentarily by the daily news. Why not? Because it is legally not at all possible and secondly the retreat of PayPal had completely different reasons.
The best answer in the article can be found at the bottom.

This post has been translated automatically

RebellYell
Top Member

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

27th May. 2020, at 01:17 am CEST#197
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Royal777 wrote on 05/27/2020 at 01:03 PM
Funny article. Actually, one could exert legal pressure, but that is not even rudimentarily mentioned in the article by the Tagesschau. Why not? Because it is not legally possible and secondly, the withdrawal of PayPal had completely different reasons.
The best answer in the article can be found at the bottom.

What other reason should there have been for PayPal?

Have read in now 4 different articles, that Paypal this was forbidden. Therefore, I believe that this was the reason, as now also with Visa

This post has been translated automatically

ruhrpott
Expert

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

27th May. 2020, at 01:30 am CEST#198
3 Likes

Liked this post: Anonym, Anonym, Avatar von Tobsen Tobsen

RebellYell wrote on 27/05/2020 at 01:17 PM
What other reason should there have been with PayPal?

Have now read 4 different articles that Paypal this was prohibited. Therefore, I believe that this was the reason, as now also with Visa.

Even if it was prohibited, you should consider that this could also be simply related to the fact that people have gradually booked back their coal at Paypal and that was perhaps the decisive point

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

27th May. 2020, at 07:24 am CEST#199
2 Likes

Liked this post: Anonym, Avatar von ruhrpott ruhrpott
ruhrpott wrote on 27.05.2020 at 01:30

Even if it was forbidden, one should consider that this could also simply be related to the fact that people have gradually booked their money back to PayPal and that was perhaps the decisive point

That's exactly how it is!

In the article of the daily news one speaks also not of criminal consequences opposite the payment offerers, but of " prohibition".
 Currently one threatens a Bodo Ramelow likewise with prohibitions, if he will loosen the measures against Corona, but therefore he is not criminally pursued let alone sentenced by any court for life

This post has been translated automatically

RebellYell
Top Member

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

27th May. 2020, at 09:39 am CEST#200
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
ruhrpott wrote on 27.05.2020 at 01:30

Even if it was forbidden, one should consider that this could also simply be related to the fact that people have gradually booked their money back at PayPal and that was perhaps the decisive point

I may not deny that at all. That will have been WITH a reason that Paypal has withdrawn. But not the only reason, but that the policy has made pressure.

Or what is there your argument why Visa has now also withdrawn (according to various articles also on pressure from politics). The players have booked back here, can not hold up as an argument

This post has been translated automatically

k****r

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

29th May. 2020, at 02:32 am CEST#201
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Royal777 wrote on 27.05.2020 at 07:24
That's exactly how it is!

In the article of the Tagesschau one speaks also not of Penal consequences opposite the payment offerers, but of " Untersagung".
 Up-to-date one threatens a Bodo Ramelow likewise with prohibitions, if it will loosen the measures against Corona, but therefore it is not criminally pursued let alone of any court life-long sentenced

Why should one also proceed criminally, if one the swamp also from the financial institutions

from the financial institutions?
There is no need to overburden the courts, and it has the same effect
PayPal lost in court, and therefore withdrew from the business.
Visa is following suit. And certainly not voluntarily, as it was a good business. But if the government
or banking regulators put pressure on you, you better go.

Incidentally, it was similar in the U.S. before regulation. There, payment service providers had
to have a "clean" slate and to get a piece of the pie when it came to legalization
A piece of the pie in the event of legalization.

The situation is similar for providers, such as Merkur. The withdrawal was strategically clever.

Why then should legal pressure be exerted, Royal? They go also in such a way!
Your answers are very often let's say without knowledge.
So you unsettle the people here!

This post has been translated automatically

ruhrpott
Expert

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

29th May. 2020, at 03:13 am CEST#202
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

RebellYell wrote on 05/27/2020 at 09:39 AM
I don't like to deny that at all. That will have been WITH a reason that PayPal has withdrawn. But just not the only reason, but that the policy has made pressure.

Or what is there your argument why Visa has now also withdrawn (According to various articles yes also on pressure from politics). The players have booked back here, can not hold up as an argument.

My post was also not meant as an attack on you Now that I've read it again myself, the impression may have arisen^^

I see it like you. There will be, just as with Visa, many different reasons for it. One could certainly also be that the providers also expect an advantage when it comes, as announced here next year to ner kind of regulation.

This post has been translated automatically

Born4Nothing
Rookie

[Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player

29th May. 2020, at 04:09 pm CEST#203
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
@cable tie

Paypal has said goodbye just 7 days after the HWB of the LG Ulm from the OC because there you could read out how it finally came.

After the ruling on 16.12.2019 then Lower Saxony has pronounced the prohibition. Then Visa and MasterCard also pulled the plug.

The payment service providers pufft just violently the muffe what happens on Halloween before the OLG Stuttgart; the strategic withdrawal comes much too late and before the impending consequences; retroactively, goes to those just the pen!

One has thus taken care of the illegal transactions to stop; was not so easy in the past because so difficult and complex as well as a monstrous effort - now it is basically quite fast^^

The federal government is also looking forward to Stuttgart - although this is already an indictment that seeks its equal - 8 years looked away and now you look further to!

@Ruhrpott

Payment providers, which have participated in the illegal transactions, I would not give a license for transaction processing with an OC; just as I would not give a license to any OC from Malta and Co. but all OC from abroad, following the Swiss example: There all foreign OC are blocked hard as nails, also in Germany block.



This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 05:31 pm CET

World
0
Offline Casinos
0
Casino Games
0

GambleJoe Team

Profile picture of JulianJulian online
Community-Manager / Complaint SpecialistProfile picture of CounterCounter
Software developerProfile picture of MatthiasMatthias
Project manager
Profile picture of DanielDaniel
Founder

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately