Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: [Chargeback] - Ulm Regional Court rules in favor of player (Page 14)

Topic created on 20th Jan. 2020 | Page: 14 of 27 | Answers: 262 | Views: 68,077
sippi
Expert
Chillaqueen92 wrote on 23/01/2020 at 09:20: Luckily I don't have a company and it serves PayPal right.

And why?

This post has been translated automatically

MarcT22186
Expert
Mo1985 wrote on 23.01.2020 at 09:17
You say that until you have your own company and someone uses your service and then afsch money back booked.

But what do you expect in a forum full of gamblers something like decency

Wow, that comment, wow!
But you are already aware that this company/companies acted against the (here valid) law!?
That has 0 to do with this forum, gamblers or otherwise. What is with all the I AGs and family businesses that you meet so in parks and train stations or in some back rooms? Are you also so loyal there?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
sippi wrote on 01/23/2020 at 09:27 AM
And why?

I will have my reason. But has nothing to do with casinos or something

This post has been translated automatically

Born4Nothing
Rookie
MarcT22186 wrote on 01/23/2020 at 09:32 AM
Wow, that comment, wow!
But you are already aware that this company/companies acted against the law (valid here)!?


Ne, is not aware because some suppress this fact and whether it is ultimately so we see then yes before the OLG Stuttgart

This post has been translated automatically

Slothot
Amateur
As I have read and followed, PP is appealing to the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court
I studied law and administrative law myself (but only got a diploma);) but I would agree with the argumentation of the "students" from the other university that the payment service providers should not be delegated a control function. That is the task of the control and licensing authorities

Personally, I see rather black

But I admire your courage and perseverance Born, and can also understand the motives. I wish you no success in the lawsuit, because in my eyes the signal effect would be a wrong one
But I wish you nevertheless strength, sufficient donations and above all much health!
And in the long run the legal way is open to everyone
And do not forget, after Karlsruhe still the possibility of the European Court of Justice would exist...

That will be really difficult

Greetings, a PayPal shareholder

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Zwischenmeister wrote on 23.01.2020 at 03:11
Nooooo, you don't get screwed, YOU don't! You'd rather take the p**s, and it's Paypal. If PayPal would not have gone you would have looked for another way to deposit...... too bad that in your childhood no one taught you to stand by your own actions and also to bear the consequences of them, instead of just pointing my finger at someone else and blaming them, although it was clearly YOU who made them an accomplice and not the other way around....

Hi,

bravo for your comment, because you speak from my soul. I see it exactly the same. In addition, the tone always makes the music. On a friendly comment has answered so something of aggressive. But the coolest thing I found was the statement that it would be about a 3-digit million amount. Ha ha ha, then that is certainly oil sheikh or member of the English royal family that he can throw around so with money. I hope that he loses the process with a strong cost note that he hears and says goes away. Would be only fair.
But money plays no role with him, so no matter... hahaha long time no longer laughed so.

This post has been translated automatically

Milan030
Amateur
I think that the player has chances if his lawyer because good arguments can bring forward.
An argument would be but for example why has PayPal because now created a "blacklist" with which you just yet carry out controls where the customer wants to transfer money?
If that is not their task to check, then you would have to set up such security measures but not at all?

Personally, I find that payment providers such as payPal or banks get away with it much too easily.
If Online Casinos are prohibited in Germany, this applies not only to the player, then the service providers should also adhere to it.
The argument with the check is even a contradiction in itself.because now blocks as said PayPal these payments that you could have done so earlier they do it now only because there was the trend where players have retrieved the money.whether with right or not that have to decide others.

Maybe you should just look at why a player can play online casinos at all? And then there is no way around it because it just allow payment providers such as PayPal or banks.

However, we also live in a country in which it is much easier to look for the fault of the player

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Born4Nothing wrote on 01/22/2020 at 9:58 pm

Yes I am also curious but for me there is no rude awakening: I am more than aware of the implications of my actions. For injustice/right you have to fight and only the least are able to do so. Above all also hold out to the end; many do not start, stumble on the way to the end or buckle... that I do not intend!

Victory or defeat!

The only difference is financial. For me it is about 15,000 EUR for PayPal about a three-digit million amount if it should really turn out what the LG Ulm for a conclusion drew and from the image damage, which Paypal could suffer times not to mention.

David against Goliath and I hope very much that history repeats itself

btw: the "enemy" reads here^^


BUT SURE IT'S ABOUT A 3-DIGIT MILLION AMOUNT : ARE YOU OIL SHEIKH OR BILLIONAIRE ? WHO BELIEVES --SO I DO NOT!!! GOOD LUCK ANYWAY.




This post has been translated automatically

Anonym


... .but sure you are sooo rich and have triple-digit millions. And in heaven is fair, and you believe that I believe you yes?

hahahaha rarely laughed so. Nevertheless, much success.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
CharlyQ wrote on 01/23/2020 at 11:49 AM

... .but sure you are sooo rich and have triple digit millions. And in heaven is fair, and you believe that I believe you yes ?

hahahaha rarely laughed so. Nevertheless, much success.

He writes but it is for him about 15000.
Fur PP u. U. around million sums, if he gets right and other plaintiffs follow...

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 07:55 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately