In short, I was reported and my girlfriend was reported by the house bank, in my case there were even 2. It was a total of 110,000 approx. everything was stopped. Legal fees totaling 3300 euros.
Was your girlfriend only a co-owner of the account or was she accused of her own crime?
But that's really good, you can see again that it can be done. I'm not assuming you're from Bavaria? 😄
WithoutWings wrote on 03.02.2025 at 18:41: Something positive for once ... The second procedure was also discontinued 👍Finally peace ✌️
Was it discontinued n ach §170 or after §153?
The difference is that §170 means that you could not prove that the money came from illegal activities. That would really put your mind at rest.
In the case of §153, my understanding is that there is no public interest in a penalty because you have not really harmed anyone (minor guilt), but it is still clear to the public prosecutor's office that it was illegal activity. In this case, the public prosecutor's office can still demand the confiscation of the wins in a few years' time in accordance with Section 76a, which has already happened to some people here.
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Was your girlfriend only a co-owner of the account or was she accused of her own crime?
But that's really good, you can see again that it can be done. I'm not assuming you're from Bavaria? 😄
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Was it discontinued n ach §170 or after §153?
The difference is that §170 means that you could not prove that the money came from illegal activities. That would really put your mind at rest.
In the case of §153, my understanding is that there is no public interest in a penalty because you have not really harmed anyone (minor guilt), but it is still clear to the public prosecutor's office that it was illegal activity. In this case, the public prosecutor's office can still demand the confiscation of the wins in a few years' time in accordance with Section 76a, which has already happened to some people here.
This post has been translated automatically