Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB) (Page 70)

Topic created on 23rd Jan. 2021 | Page: 70 of 70 | Answers: 693 | Views: 176,267
miketrey00

Anonymous wrote on 18.12.2024 at 21:56:

Why youth welfare, or educational educational measures? Are you still a minor?

Was 19-20 years old at the time, according to pedagogical assessment, the JGG may apply



Theodor wrote on 18.12.2024 at 22:14:

Never ever do you have to go to court for a double-digit sum


I think so too. I just didn't show up for the summons back then because I didn't understand the drama behind it. As of today, my account has never been blocked. Maybe they would like to hold a hearing before issuing a penalty order or acquittal. But I'm not going to rest on my laurels and will probably seek legal help.

This post has been translated automatically

Theodor
Rookie

miketrey00 wrote on 18.12.2024 at 21:03:

Well in the indictment are just black on white my depositors and that I have made a withdrawal in the amount of XY and this should be withdrawn from me according to 73, 73c i.V.m 285

Another two-liner regarding the application for the main hearing before the district court blah blah blah.
It's difficult for me to take action against the upcoming main hearing anyway. I may have to go through it with a lawyer. But it will be interesting if I attend the appointment with the youth welfare service, which will list the possible consequences and develop educational measures with me (whatever you might call them)

I don't understand why you didn't pay the money, as you wrote in your first post? So why are you now planning to go to court with a lawyer if your plan was actually to "pay the fine to the state"?

This post has been translated automatically

miketrey00

Theodor wrote on 18.12.2024 at 22:59:

I don't understand why you didn't pay the money as you wrote in your first post? So why are you now planning to go to court with a lawyer if your plan was actually to "transfer the fine to the state"?

I only found out about the payment of the 2-digit sum in the indictment. During the investigation, there was only talk of §285 and my depositors. At the same time as an indictment, a main hearing is requested at the competent district court and, as already mentioned above, you rarely get the SA to withdraw it, i.e. I didn't even have the opportunity to simply transfer this amount. And since public prosecutors generally have a high level of education, I strongly assume that he won't send me to court because of this measly payment and that I will have to arm myself with a lawyer in the worst case. That was my ulterior motive

This post has been translated automatically

Theodor
Rookie

miketrey00 wrote on 18.12.2024 at 23:10:

I only found out about the payment of the 2 digit sum in the indictment. During the investigation there was only talk of §285 and my depositors. At the same time as an indictment, a main hearing is requested at the competent district court and, as already mentioned above, you rarely get the SA to withdraw it, i.e. I didn't even have the opportunity to simply transfer this amount. And since public prosecutors generally have a high level of education, I strongly assume that he won't send me to court because of this measly payment and that I will have to arm myself with a lawyer in the worst case. That was my ulterior motive

It's unbelievable that a colleague with a 6-digit payout has no problems but you are taken to court for a 2-digit payout. Completely random

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics19th Dec. 2024 at 01:57 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of livecounter_GJTesterlivecounter_GJTester
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately