Why youth welfare, or educational educational measures? Are you still a minor?
Was 19-20 years old at the time, according to pedagogical assessment, the JGG may apply
Theodor wrote on 18.12.2024 at 22:14:
Never ever do you have to go to court for a double-digit sum
I think so too. I just didn't show up for the summons back then because I didn't understand the drama behind it. As of today, my account has never been blocked. Maybe they would like to hold a hearing before issuing a penalty order or acquittal. But I'm not going to rest on my laurels and will probably seek legal help.
Well in the indictment are just black on white my depositors and that I have made a withdrawal in the amount of XY and this should be withdrawn from me according to 73, 73c i.V.m 285
Another two-liner regarding the application for the main hearing before the district court blah blah blah.
It's difficult for me to take action against the upcoming main hearing anyway. I may have to go through it with a lawyer. But it will be interesting if I attend the appointment with the youth welfare service, which will list the possible consequences and develop educational measures with me (whatever you might call them)
I don't understand why you didn't pay the money, as you wrote in your first post? So why are you now planning to go to court with a lawyer if your plan was actually to "pay the fine to the state"?
I don't understand why you didn't pay the money as you wrote in your first post? So why are you now planning to go to court with a lawyer if your plan was actually to "transfer the fine to the state"?
I only found out about the payment of the 2-digit sum in the indictment. During the investigation, there was only talk of §285 and my depositors. At the same time as an indictment, a main hearing is requested at the competent district court and, as already mentioned above, you rarely get the SA to withdraw it, i.e. I didn't even have the opportunity to simply transfer this amount. And since public prosecutors generally have a high level of education, I strongly assume that he won't send me to court because of this measly payment and that I will have to arm myself with a lawyer in the worst case. That was my ulterior motive
I only found out about the payment of the 2 digit sum in the indictment. During the investigation there was only talk of §285 and my depositors. At the same time as an indictment, a main hearing is requested at the competent district court and, as already mentioned above, you rarely get the SA to withdraw it, i.e. I didn't even have the opportunity to simply transfer this amount. And since public prosecutors generally have a high level of education, I strongly assume that he won't send me to court because of this measly payment and that I will have to arm myself with a lawyer in the worst case. That was my ulterior motive
It's unbelievable that a colleague with a 6-digit payout has no problems but you are taken to court for a 2-digit payout. Completely random
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Was 19-20 years old at the time, according to pedagogical assessment, the JGG may apply
I think so too. I just didn't show up for the summons back then because I didn't understand the drama behind it. As of today, my account has never been blocked. Maybe they would like to hold a hearing before issuing a penalty order or acquittal. But I'm not going to rest on my laurels and will probably seek legal help.
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't understand why you didn't pay the money, as you wrote in your first post? So why are you now planning to go to court with a lawyer if your plan was actually to "pay the fine to the state"?
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
I only found out about the payment of the 2-digit sum in the indictment. During the investigation, there was only talk of §285 and my depositors. At the same time as an indictment, a main hearing is requested at the competent district court and, as already mentioned above, you rarely get the SA to withdraw it, i.e. I didn't even have the opportunity to simply transfer this amount. And since public prosecutors generally have a high level of education, I strongly assume that he won't send me to court because of this measly payment and that I will have to arm myself with a lawyer in the worst case. That was my ulterior motive
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
It's unbelievable that a colleague with a 6-digit payout has no problems but you are taken to court for a 2-digit payout. Completely random
This post has been translated automatically