Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB) (Page 50)

Topic created on 23rd Jan. 2021 | Page: 50 of 50 | Answers: 497 | Views: 144,591
DaseR92
Amateur

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

9th Nov. 2024, at 01:49 am CET#493
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Falko wrote on 08.11.2024 at 21:51:

But when e should that be possible to pay for the vast majority, if only out but no depositors are charged. The vast majority of people who play regularly have no savings at all. The only option would be to do community service, take out a loan or serve time in prison. The latter would cost the state the most. And taking out a loan for that reason, can the state really force you to do so, would that be allowed in a constitutional state, considering the consequences for these people?


As with most fines, payment in installments. You get the "credit" from the state, so to speak.

This post has been translated automatically

Druff
Rookie

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

9th Nov. 2024, at 04:37 am CET#494
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Falko wrote on 08.11.2024 at 21:51:

But when e should that be possible to pay for the vast majority, if only out but no depositors are charged. The vast majority of people who play regularly have no savings at all. The only option would be to do community service, take out a loan or serve time in prison. The latter would cost the state the most. And taking out a loan for that reason, can the state really force you to do so, would that be allowed in a constitutional state, considering the consequences for these people?

As has already been mentioned, you definitely don't go to Cafe Viereck if you can't pay a fine etc., then there's payment in installments or just a work requirement, in comparison, you definitely go to Cafe Viereck for repeated driving without a ticket, regardless of whether you pay the increased transportation fee or not.


I keep asking myself the following about this topic: Do you only think this is wrong because you might be affected yourself or would you also think it's wrong if you weren't gambling? I mean is it right that fare dodgers go to jail? Is it right that someone goes to prison for repeated theft? Or a fine for something that is relatively minor, by that I mean:

Someone who repeatedly steals bread for 2 euros because they are hungry pays hundreds of euros in fines plus a catch bonus, if you are caught fare dodging two or three times it's the same only you go to prison and someone who pays out hundreds from an online casino also pays hundreds but in relation to that it's significantly less.

Hence the question, is the ratio correct?

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

9th Nov. 2024, at 09:41 am CET#495
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Druff wrote on 09.11.2024 at 04:37:

As has already been mentioned, you definitely don't go to Cafe Viereck if you can't pay a fine etc, then there's installment payment or just a work requirement, in comparison you definitely go to Cafe Viereck for repeated driving without a ticket, regardless of whether you pay it increased transportation fee or not.


I keep asking myself the following about this topic: Do you only think this is wrong because you might be affected yourself or would you also think it's wrong if you weren't gambling? I mean is it right that fare dodgers go to jail? Is it right that someone goes to prison for repeated theft? Or a fine for something that is relatively minor, by that I mean:

Someone who repeatedly steals bread for 2 euros because they are hungry pays hundreds of euros in fines plus a catch bonus, if you are caught fare dodging two or three times it's the same only you go to prison and someone who pays out hundreds from an online casino also pays hundreds but in relation to that it's significantly less.

Hence the question, is the relation correct?

It's a good question that somehow requires a lot of consideration to answer, but is still difficult to answer...


First of all, from the outside, justice is a difficult subject in the judicial system anyway, and judgments are made in many areas that are difficult to follow.

With regard to gambling in particular, you're certainly right that someone who has nothing to do with it either doesn't care or says, yes, that's fine, it's just illegal.

If you now ignore all the stupidities of regulation, because they are stupidities but basically say nothing about illegality or legality, you have a violation of a law.
However, I think that an important principle in the assessment must be whether you are causing harm to someone else.... And I would say no in this case.
I would therefore differentiate between whether you were caught for the first time or several times.

The first time I would stop the proceedings, as I used to do for minor offenses involving weed, for example, and point out that it will be expensive the next time.

Let's take a case like Mtoro's, for example...
If you are now expected to pay off your wins without offsetting your losses, even though the money has probably long since gone back to some casino, then depending on your circumstances and the amount involved, this can hit you much worse than, for example, someone who gets a suspended sentence for sexual abuse for some incomprehensible reason... It simply can't be that.

I mean, of course we have a law now and it has to be implemented, no matter how nonsensical it is. But you should find a way that doesn't ruin people and, in the worst case, families even more than gambling itself... And in the next step, ask yourself why so many people still gamble illegally and revise its regulation...


This post has been translated automatically

mikejonesmaen
Rookie

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

9th Nov. 2024, at 10:40 am CET#496
1 Like

Liked this post: Avatar von Tobsen Tobsen
Received a police summons on 25.09.2024.
Just received a letter from the public prosecutor's office today, proceedings have been discontinued.

I did not go to the police at the time and did not react in any way.

This post has been translated automatically

JJepsa96
Rookie

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

9th Nov. 2024, at 11:01 am CET#497
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

mikejonesmaen wrote on 09.11.2024 at 10:40 am: Received a summons from the police on 25.09.2024.
Today just mail from the public prosecutor's office, proceedings were discontinued.

I did not go to the police at the time and did not react in any way.

What time and effort is lost for such petty stories.... A picture-book example of German bureaucracy..

This post has been translated automatically

Theodor
Visitor

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

9th Nov. 2024, at 12:35 pm CET#498
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

mikejonesmaen wrote on 09.11.2024 at 10:40 am: Received a summons from the police on 25.09.2024.
Today just mail from the public prosecutor's office, proceedings were discontinued.

I did not go to the police at the time and did not react in any way.

What amount were you charged?

This post has been translated automatically

mikejonesmaen
Rookie

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

9th Nov. 2024, at 12:49 pm CET#499
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Was never specified, nor was the period. Estimated to be at least a mid 5-digit amount.

This post has been translated automatically

Dachpitti70

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

9th Nov. 2024, at 02:05 pm CET#500
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

WithoutWings wrote on 08.11.2024 at 11:48 am:

Whether you lost more than you won doesn't matter. For me, only the payouts count. LocoWin has never been legal. I hope you didn't pay out too much.

i paid out 8000euros in the period mentioned.


Kind regards

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics12th Nov. 2024 at 09:15 pm CET

World
0
Watch-out
0
Miscellaneous
0

GambleJoe Team

Profile picture of JulianJulian
Community-Manager / Complaint SpecialistProfile picture of CounterCounter
Software developerProfile picture of MatthiasMatthias
Project manager
Profile picture of DanielDaniel
Founder

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately