Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB) (Page 41)

Topic created on 23rd Jan. 2021 | Page: 41 of 70 | Answers: 698 | Views: 178,937
Jasonknz878
Rookie

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

27th Sep. 2024, at 01:15 pm CEST#403
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Opirat107 wrote on 27.09.2024 at 12:54 pm:

I would like to know how many transactions are listed in your penalty order? Would be interesting to know. And how much is the collection of wins approximately? Because that's usually the bigger chunk. If that hadn't been the case, I would most probably have paid the daily rates.

Approx. 8 transactions, 2 of which were wins.
Total 4 figures in terms of wins and depositors.

How many were there for you and what approximate amount?

This post has been translated automatically

pirat107
Visitor

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

27th Sep. 2024, at 01:19 pm CEST#404
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Jasonknz878 wrote on 27.09.2024 at 13:15:
Approx 8 transactions of which 2 were wins.
Total 4 digits in terms of win and depositor.

How many were there for you and what amount?

Okay, I really can't explain that if that's true. For me it said per depositor and thus participation 5 daily rates are due. Of course, I don't know whether this is generally the case or whether the public prosecutor's office has any leeway.

The way you write it sounds pretty harmless.

This post has been translated automatically

Jasonknz878
Rookie

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

27th Sep. 2024, at 01:31 pm CEST#405
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

pirat107 wrote on 27.09.2024 at 13:19:

Okay then I really can't explain that if that's true. I was told 5 daily rates per depositor and thus participation. Of course, I don't know if this is generally fixed or if the public prosecutor's office has any leeway.

The way you write it sounds pretty harmless.

Yes, but not everyone is reported, is that normal? It's really surprising that so many people have had their cases dropped after being summoned by the police..

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

27th Sep. 2024, at 01:55 pm CEST#406
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

morallyreprehensible wrote on 27.09.2024 07:26:

On what grounds do you make this statement?


Contact every public prosecutor's office in Germany?
Just because there is nothing to read about every federal state here and perhaps in other forums, you cannot make such a statement.

It is generally known how differently people are punished here, especially since the whole topic is still new, it is easy to assume what the reason might be

I don't actually see anything wrong with the statement, but it should be more of a guess and not a 100% fact

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

27th Sep. 2024, at 11:48 pm CEST#407
2 Likes

Liked this post: Avatar von bigbig bigbig, Avatar von Donnie Donnie
I would give them a cough and stop GEZ too


everyone knows where the money goes

a rogue......

This post has been translated automatically

gamjoer

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

29th Sep. 2024, at 10:31 am CEST#408
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
but you can get on a plane and go to macau and gamble in the casino with your card. That doesn't bother the stasi. The fact that money is wasted on setting up all the aparatus and distributing invitations... They can hardly wait to carry out procedures for forbidden thoughts at some point.

This post has been translated automatically

btssultan
Experienced

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

29th Sep. 2024, at 12:22 pm CEST#409
2 Likes

Liked this post: Avatar von Chewi Chewi, Avatar von Max_Bet Max_Bet
It is also typical that instead of creating a uniform penalty for illegal gambling, the transactions are of course taken so that more money can be made. Would be more interesting to say and what penalty can the Provider expect? None? That's right, he's based abroad and has the freedom of a fool.

On the one hand, the German state argues that it is illegal, but on the other hand, nothing is really done to stop it, even though the possibilities have existed for tens of years.

It is not enough that most players have already lost enough money, it is made even more difficult and you are additionally ripped off by the state. So why doesn't the state get the money back from the providers or the banks? There is not even a clear regulation here.

This post has been translated automatically

reaggie
Rookie

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

29th Sep. 2024, at 01:26 pm CEST#410
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

btssultan wrote on 29.09.2024 at 12:22: Also typical, instead of designing a uniform penalty for illegal gambling, you naturally take the transactions so that you can of course rake in more money. Would be more interesting to say and what penalty does the Provider face? None? That's right, he's based abroad and has the freedom of a fool.

On the one hand, the German state argues that it is illegal, but on the other hand, nothing is really done to stop it, even though the possibilities have existed for tens of years.

It is not enough that most players have already lost enough money, it is made even more difficult and you are additionally ripped off by the state. So why doesn't the state get the money back from the providers or the banks? There is not even a clear regulation here.

Well, standardizing would not be feasible. If someone has won 1000 euros or 1000000 euros should still play a role, or should both pay a 500000 fine? That makes no sense.

I got the same answer when I tried to get my money back: Nobody is forcing you to play on illegal sites "now".
What options have been available for tens of years? Do you want to censor North Korea or what possibilities do you have to block foreign sites within Germany?
I don't think the state will go and sue for the lost money, but for the wins. So why get the money from the provider? They have paid out the money. The banks can do even less if they give you the freedom to spend your money where you want, so why should the state take it from the bank? And if you get a fine, I think it will be for tax evasion rather than illegal gambling. Because the proceedings as to whether it was legal or not are before the ECJ. So there's no clear ruling on that yet.

This post has been translated automatically

mikejonesmaen
Rookie

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

30th Sep. 2024, at 10:27 am CEST#411
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
In the meantime, I have also received a complaint or a summons for unauthorized gambling.

Unfortunately, I used to make direct bank transfers from time to time in 2022/2023. Later switched completely to e-wallet (Mifinity) or Binance/crypto. Will the police only investigate direct bank transfers or also e-wallet/crypto?

This post has been translated automatically

Jasonknz878
Rookie

Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)

30th Sep. 2024, at 11:03 am CEST#412
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

mikejonesmaen wrote on 30.09.2024 at 10:27 am: In the meantime, I have also received a complaint or a summons for unauthorized gambling.

Unfortunately, I used to make direct bank transfers from time to time in 2022/2023. Later switched completely to e-wallet (Mifinity) or Binance/crypto. Will the police only investigate direct bank transfers or also e-wallet/crypto?

I can't answer that about e-wallet/crypto? What time period were you given or how many months or days? Have you already canceled the appointment or not gone or what is your situation?

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Dec. 2024 at 11:28 am CET

Gossip
0
Offline Casinos
0
Offline Casinos
0

GambleJoe Team

Profile picture of JulianJulian
Community-Manager / Complaint SpecialistProfile picture of CounterCounter
Software developerProfile picture of MatthiasMatthias
Project manager
Profile picture of DanielDaniel
Founder

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre online
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately