Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB) (Page 36)

Topic created on 23rd Jan. 2021 | Page: 36 of 51 | Answers: 509 | Views: 148,006
roccoammo11
Expert

dazzle_tea wrote on 27.07.2024 09:34:

you have to take a look at the job ads at GGl. I just stumbled across it by chance because I was looking for something for another thread.

Vacancies (gluecksspiel-behoerde.de)

specifically, I mean this one:
temporary clerk (m/f/d) unauthorized gambling / advertising

please also note the requirements profile for the position! i mean how quickly and well and sensibly can someone familiarize themselves in this time?
the whole thing is something between ridiculous, very bad in gray & Stasi.





so I think it's cheeky to favor women...

the other way around there would be topless protests in Halle again... there is also the danger that the representative will also get pregnant in any case it sounds really Stasi-like to want to gamble somewhere with their fake identities...hard to believe that something like this should be legal even if it is about unlicensed casinos...

This post has been translated automatically

n****4

Saphira wrote on July 26, 2024 at 11:37 pm:

But not because of gambling?

Banks are rigerous, I've already been terminated because of that. Now they are watching me too it's not worth it anymore e wallets are better

This post has been translated automatically

B****3

needle34 wrote on 27.07.2024 at 13:00:

Banks are rigerous I've been canceled because of it before. Now they are watching me too it's not worth it anymore e wallets are better

How can a bank watch you if they have canceled you ????


With binoculars!

It has never been worth it to pay in or out through or with banks!

It was and has been known for years what can happen, so I can only shake my head.

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite
roccoammo11 wrote on July 27, 2024 at 12:46 pm:

so preferably women I find a cheek...

the other way around there would be topless protests in Halle again... there is also the danger that the representative will also get pregnant: D in any case, it sounds really Stasi-like to want to gamble somewhere with their fake identities...hard to believe that something like this should be legal even if it's about unlicensed casinos...

It's funny that you mention this scenario. I had it at a former employer. Colleague X (Perso) became pregnant, she chose a replacement herself (of course the boss had the final say). A replacement was then found and started in July. She was trained and in August colleague X went on maternity leave. In February of the following year (i.e. 6 months later), the replacement also became pregnant. The game started all over again I didn't get to know the replacement because I had given my notice beforehand. That was all during Corona and when it was much easier for companies to go into short-time work. Of course, this company also went into short-time work. Short-time work > less money and a conspicuous number of colleagues became pregnant. It felt like they were trying to get pregnant to get out of short-time work. No blame to them, it was all within the law and the employer often didn't take employee rights and/or labor laws too seriously, so I can kind of understand them all^^ But it was noticeable how many women got pregnant in a short time xD

and yes, I generally find such a passage problematic. As a male person, I already feel discriminated against I suspect that almost only women are employed in this department. I also had the experience of working in a department where only women were employed. That was exhausting, to put it nicely. I was/am more the quiet type who goes about his work and hardly talks. They spent 8 hours a day chatting and gossiping. So, I'm already talkative, but that was really too much. There are also moments or days when you just need peace and quiet and you just want to do your job.

Incidentally, I'm of the same opinion when it comes to the passage concerning the severely disabled. I've learned that severely disabled people don't like being given preferential treatment (unless it's an emergency). Most of them want to be treated and regarded normally. It also feels more like coercion than inclusion.

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert
When I was still working in the office, I was also the "cock of the walk" with 8-10 ladies depending on the situation. Stupidly, I was also the superior...What women can't stand when they're bickering and bashing each other's heads in over trivial shit Such niggles can be really exhausting and productivity suffers from the nagging. So every now and then, if necessary, call in the opponents and get things out of the way so that things are quiet again. As you know, chatter is nothing for men . Of course, I was also the target of the Furies from time to time, but in the end, when the store closed, it was: "You were always our favorite boss, Langhans"

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon

Langhans_innen wrote on 27.07.2024 at 19:45: When I was still working in the office, I was also the "cock of the walk" with 8-10 ladies depending on the situation. Everything was actually wonderful. stupidly, I was also the supervisor...What women bitch and bash each other's heads because of a trivial shit, you really can't stand it in the same Such niggles can be really exhausting and productivity also suffers with the nagging. So every now and then, if necessary, call in the opponents and get things out of the way so that things are quiet again. As you know, chatter is nothing for men . Of course, I was also the target of the Furies from time to time, but in the end, when the store closed, it was: "You were always our favorite boss, Langhans"

Sorry for OT but what the heck happened to your name and where the heck is Langhans_outside?

This post has been translated automatically

B****3
I think what you two are pulling out of the woodwork here is really borderline!

Assumptions without evidence, of course everyone wants to get pregnant and so ... Mensch Frapi !!!

You probably had too much champagne for your birthday, congratulations by the way.

And there are disabled people who insist on it and admit it openly! And enjoy the benefits!

And that "of course" Langhans also has a story about it was clear and of course as boss under him it doesn't work!

Rarely have I read such rubbish, maybe you should watch less comedy, then the truth will come out!

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert

gamble1 wrote on July 27, 2024 at 9:47 pm:

Sorry for OT but what the heck happened to your name please and where the heck is Langhans_outside ?

oh, you must have missed that....a real player's fate has befallen me.....because I'm now under the hood proof photo attached.

By the way, a little addendum, in case some of you are barely getting into the free games with other slots: I counted them at home over lunch today. In addition to Jolly Girl and the bad-tempered king, Madame Destiny, Lucky Lady Charm and Holla the Wood Fairy are now also here. The bipolar horse also trotted onto my property... without being forced to do so. You can't really play Jolly's Cap anymore due to the lack of symbols, because there are hardly any possible combinations even in the base game
Langhans_innen

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert
Blubbo33 wrote on 27.07.2024 at 21:57:
And that "of course" Langhans also has a story about it again was clear and of course as the boss under him it is not possible!

Rarely read such groats, maybe you should watch less comedy, then it works with the truth!

If you're referring to me with the groats or the untruth I don't have to make that up out of thin air, because that's exactly what happened. Nor do I see any reason to make up anything about any topic that doesn't correspond to the truth Apart from the bipolar horse, perhaps

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
HAMMER thread once again 😂😂😂😂 chapeau!

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics18th Nov. 2024 at 11:24 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately