gamble1 wrote on 06.06.2024 at 10:26 am:
Fortunately there are still prosecutors who are aware of their responsibility and do not equate every citizen directly with a felon, that is human! We need more people like that, please, the others we are happy to give away in exchange
Yes, I think so too!
"As a purely precautionary measure, I would like to draw your attention to the so-called whitelist of the Joint Gambling Authority of the Federal States (GGL), from which the offers licensed in Germany can be taken."
"As a purely precautionary measure, I would like to draw your attention to the so-called whitelist of the Joint Gambling Authority of the Federal States (GGL), from which the offers licensed in Germany can be taken."
He also left me a nice message
Sounds like someone is a brother of ours I think the reference is an ambiguous reference because anyone who knows the whitelist will know "you don't recommend the whitelist to anyone"
Regarding case 1 ... with 6-figure deposits and withdrawals, I would have hired a lawyer just because of the large sums involved. And in case 2, no one has said that they will reclaim the wins, have they?
In my case it is specifically about a 54000 Euro win and about 10,000 in depositors... I have been waiting for 2 months almost for access to the files already ... which makes me suspect that they are either still investigating or are aiming for a search or are overwhelmed as many are requesting files due to the cannabis law and the courts here in the north are generally very slow....
Guys, are you ignoring this or why is hardly anyone commenting here? The 2 guys here had their houses searched and one of them got a very harsh penalty order... there are people here for whom the sums involved were much higher and in the end it was simply dropped anyway. Why are there such awesome differences? I have the feeling that it's simply a matter of luck what happens. For 99 percent of people it is simply dropped, but there are always other cases.
Anonymus wrote on 15.06.2024 at 12:38: People, are you ignoring this or why is hardly anyone commenting here? The 2 guys here have had house searches and one of them got a very harsh penalty order... there are people here for whom the sums involved were much higher and in the end it was simply dropped anyway. Why are there such awesome differences? I have the feeling that it's simply a matter of luck what happens. For 99 percent of people it is simply dropped, but there are always other cases.
Quite simply because nobody wants to pursue this unnecessary shit but they are forced to do so by their job because some people would like to flush more money into the state coffers!
They can't be arsed to work out a sensible regulation and offer by far the worst service that has ever existed anywhere and because 99% of people don't use this shit because they don't want to be screwed, they have to enforce their bullshit in a different way
Then you have prosecutors who are sure to have a lot of fun grabbing a few cases for their statistics and others who do their job in the interests of the people and don't do everything they can to exploit their own countrymen
Anonymus wrote on 15.06.2024 at 12:38: People, are you ignoring this or why is hardly anyone commenting here? The 2 guys here have had house searches and one of them got a very harsh penalty order... there are people here for whom the sums involved were much higher and in the end it was simply dropped anyway. Why are there such awesome differences? I have the feeling that it's simply a matter of luck what happens. For 99 percent of people it is simply dropped, but there are always other cases.
It's not the police who decide whether a house is searched, but the public prosecutor's office/tax investigation. Everyone decides differently. That's why you can also appeal/review a judgment.
One person orders a house search, another does not. There is no guideline - i.e. that one says, for example, okay, from €200,000 win there is a house search or everything <€50,000 is stopped.
But what strikes me is that most of the people who have had problems with the police have had their bank accounts closed beforehand.
and as gamble1 has already written, I think many people don't write anything about this because it's a very sensitive topic that many people are afraid of. Dealing with it can also be unpleasant for some people, because it's perhaps only then that they realize what they might have to face.
Also awesome with the HD if you have e.g. a fat gaming PC and then it's gone for a while lol they have their ass open ... but that would really be the only thing that would bother me with ner HD that they take away your PC and all other devices for the first time ..really sad this country.
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, I think so too!
"As a purely precautionary measure, I would like to draw your attention to the so-called whitelist of the Joint Gambling Authority of the Federal States (GGL), from which the offers licensed in Germany can be taken."
He also left me a nice message
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Liked this post: Saphira
Sounds like someone is a brother of ours I think the reference is an ambiguous reference because anyone who knows the whitelist will know "you don't recommend the whitelist to anyone"
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Liked this post: Ladybug1998, Tobsen
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
In my case it is specifically about a 54000 Euro win and about 10,000 in depositors... I have been waiting for 2 months almost for access to the files already ... which makes me suspect that they are either still investigating or are aiming for a search or are overwhelmed as many are requesting files due to the cannabis law and the courts here in the north are generally very slow....
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Quite simply because nobody wants to pursue this unnecessary shit but they are forced to do so by their job because some people would like to flush more money into the state coffers!
They can't be arsed to work out a sensible regulation and offer by far the worst service that has ever existed anywhere and because 99% of people don't use this shit because they don't want to be screwed, they have to enforce their bullshit in a different way
Then you have prosecutors who are sure to have a lot of fun grabbing a few cases for their statistics and others who do their job in the interests of the people and don't do everything they can to exploit their own countrymen
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Liked this post: Saphira
It's not the police who decide whether a house is searched, but the public prosecutor's office/tax investigation. Everyone decides differently. That's why you can also appeal/review a judgment.
One person orders a house search, another does not. There is no guideline - i.e. that one says, for example, okay, from €200,000 win there is a house search or everything <€50,000 is stopped.
But what strikes me is that most of the people who have had problems with the police have had their bank accounts closed beforehand.
and as gamble1 has already written, I think many people don't write anything about this because it's a very sensitive topic that many people are afraid of. Dealing with it can also be unpleasant for some people, because it's perhaps only then that they realize what they might have to face.
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Liked this post: bigbig
This post has been translated automatically
Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically