Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB) (Page 29)

Topic created on 23rd Jan. 2021 | Page: 29 of 33 | Answers: 322 | Views: 92,748
Ladybug1998
Rookie

gamble1 wrote on 06.06.2024 at 10:26 am:
Fortunately there are still prosecutors who are aware of their responsibility and do not equate every citizen directly with a felon, that is human! We need more people like that, please, the others we are happy to give away in exchange

Yes, I think so too!


"As a purely precautionary measure, I would like to draw your attention to the so-called whitelist of the Joint Gambling Authority of the Federal States (GGL), from which the offers licensed in Germany can be taken."

He also left me a nice message

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend

Ladybug1998 wrote on 06/06/2024 10:57:

Yes, I think so too!


"As a purely precautionary measure, I would like to draw your attention to the so-called whitelist of the Joint Gambling Authority of the Federal States (GGL), from which the offers licensed in Germany can be taken."

He also left me a nice message

Sounds like someone is a brother of ours I think the reference is an ambiguous reference because anyone who knows the whitelist will know "you don't recommend the whitelist to anyone"

This post has been translated automatically

fowi30
Rookie
-- The post was deleted at the request of the author --

This post has been translated automatically

WithoutWings
Expert
Regarding case 1 ... with 6-figure deposits and withdrawals, I would have hired a lawyer just because of the large sums involved. And in case 2, no one has said that they will reclaim the wins, have they?

In my case it is specifically about a 54000 Euro win and about 10,000 in depositors... I have been waiting for 2 months almost for access to the files already ... which makes me suspect that they are either still investigating or are aiming for a search or are overwhelmed as many are requesting files due to the cannabis law and the courts here in the north are generally very slow....

This post has been translated automatically

Anonymus
Rookie
Guys, are you ignoring this or why is hardly anyone commenting here? The 2 guys here had their houses searched and one of them got a very harsh penalty order... there are people here for whom the sums involved were much higher and in the end it was simply dropped anyway. Why are there such awesome differences? I have the feeling that it's simply a matter of luck what happens. For 99 percent of people it is simply dropped, but there are always other cases.

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert
figures and statistics in the end it is cost-utilization accounting

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend

Anonymus wrote on 15.06.2024 at 12:38: People, are you ignoring this or why is hardly anyone commenting here? The 2 guys here have had house searches and one of them got a very harsh penalty order... there are people here for whom the sums involved were much higher and in the end it was simply dropped anyway. Why are there such awesome differences? I have the feeling that it's simply a matter of luck what happens. For 99 percent of people it is simply dropped, but there are always other cases.

Quite simply because nobody wants to pursue this unnecessary shit but they are forced to do so by their job because some people would like to flush more money into the state coffers!


They can't be arsed to work out a sensible regulation and offer by far the worst service that has ever existed anywhere and because 99% of people don't use this shit because they don't want to be screwed, they have to enforce their bullshit in a different way

Then you have prosecutors who are sure to have a lot of fun grabbing a few cases for their statistics and others who do their job in the interests of the people and don't do everything they can to exploit their own countrymen

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite
Anonymus wrote on 15.06.2024 at 12:38: People, are you ignoring this or why is hardly anyone commenting here? The 2 guys here have had house searches and one of them got a very harsh penalty order... there are people here for whom the sums involved were much higher and in the end it was simply dropped anyway. Why are there such awesome differences? I have the feeling that it's simply a matter of luck what happens. For 99 percent of people it is simply dropped, but there are always other cases.

It's not the police who decide whether a house is searched, but the public prosecutor's office/tax investigation. Everyone decides differently. That's why you can also appeal/review a judgment.

One person orders a house search, another does not. There is no guideline - i.e. that one says, for example, okay, from €200,000 win there is a house search or everything <€50,000 is stopped.

But what strikes me is that most of the people who have had problems with the police have had their bank accounts closed beforehand.

and as gamble1 has already written, I think many people don't write anything about this because it's a very sensitive topic that many people are afraid of. Dealing with it can also be unpleasant for some people, because it's perhaps only then that they realize what they might have to face.

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert
see cum ex senior prosecutor resigned

This post has been translated automatically

hustlehoff
Expert
Also awesome with the HD if you have e.g. a fat gaming PC and then it's gone for a while lol they have their ass open ... but that would really be the only thing that would bother me with ner HD that they take away your PC and all other devices for the first time ..really sad this country.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics1st Jul. 2024 at 10:10 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately