Casinotest 24 back?

GambleJoe Cookies
Providers:	GJ International Limited
	Cookie name:	PHPSESSID
	Purpose:	This cookie is created by an application based on PHP. The purpose of this cookie is to recognise the user.
	Cookie lifetime:	24 months
	Cookie name:	sid
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to assign personal configuration data.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	gjcook[ver]
	Purpose:	Version of the saved privacy setting
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	gjcook[stat]
	Purpose:	Configuration of statistic cookies
	Cookie lifetime:	12 month
	Cookie name:	identifier
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to automatically log in when using the "Stay logged in" feature.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	securitytoken
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to automatically login when using the "stay signed in" feature.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months

Google Analytics
Providers:	Google Ireland Limited
Data protection decl.:	https://policies.google.com/privacy
	Cookie name:	_ga
	Purpose:	Collection of statistics on the website usage. (Measurement of the range)
	Cookie lifetime:	24 months
	Cookie name:	_gid
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to collect user statistics for the website.
	Cookie lifetime:	24 hours
	Cookie name:	_gat
	Purpose:	Used to throttle the request rate.
	Cookie lifetime:	0

Amateur

LittleFu

Forum posts: 213 Member since: 30.04.2018

22nd Aug. 2018, at 11:13 am CEST#11

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

I think he started streaming yesterday with 10k...
And he has a new account at Lapa... How can I tell? His Immortal bonus was only the first level...
And if he now only has the 1st level every time he starts streaming, then Fake Accounts?

This post has been translated automatically

Elite

T0uchTheSky

Forum posts: 2.420 Member since: 09.05.2018

Casinotest 24 back?

22nd Aug. 2018, at 11:26 am CEST#12

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

LittleFu wrote on 22/08/2018 at 11:13:
And he has a new account at Lapa... How can I tell? His Immortal bonus was only the first level...

He probably has an account with his real name now, before that he wasn't 18 and the old account belonged to his father so to speak.

Or Lapalingo had to delete the old account because of evidence of doing business with a minor...

This post has been translated automatically

s****e

Forum posts: 1.004 Member has been banned

Casinotest 24 back?

22nd Aug. 2018, at 12:08 pm CEST#13

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Lapalingo has definitely dirt on him. Either he has sent to the Verfikation the ID etc of his father
Father, then they would not have noticed it at first, but at the latest after all the
Discussions and deletions . At the latest then he would have had to be blocked to the
To preserve the credibility of Lapalingo.

Or else, he didn't need to verify himself at all, which is almost an even bigger violation.
So how to turn it, Lapalingo comes out of it hard.

If you now still consider how many people they have canceled the money because they have not adhered to the
AGB have kept, it has a very negative aftertaste.

@Royal777

How anyone can be happy when a child streams, even if he may be 18 now, I will
never be able to understand. You can't have much in your head there.

Your argumentations are honestly complete nonsense, and you completely overlook the punishability of his
Of his actions
The apparent inability to recognize this disqualifies you from a normal discussion.

But I already know your answer:

I don't give a shit, the guy is great, and you are all just jealous.

The classic answer of a let's say "mediocre" citizen!

P.S. Inform yourself about criminal law.
StGB is a secret Tip

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Former Member

Casinotest 24 back?

22nd Aug. 2018, at 12:12 pm CEST#14

1 Like

Liked this post: s****e

stkrie wrote on 22/08/2018 at 12:08 pm: Lapalingo definitely has dirt on him. Either he has sent to the Verfikation the ID etc of his
Father sent, then they would not have noticed at first, but at the latest after all the
Discussions and deletions . At the latest then he should have been blocked.

Or else, he didn't need to verify himself at all, which is almost an even bigger violation.
So how to turn it, Lapalingo comes out there hard out of the matter.

If you now still consider how many people they have canceled the money because they have not adhered to the
AGB have kept, it has a very negative aftertaste.

And that's exactly why Lapalingo is the second casino where I get blocked. I do not support such practices.

Let an underage play and pay for it and deny other normal players the payout because se have violated some stupid terms and conditions. Exactly my humor. Lapalingo and also this lying wretch are for me morally the very last.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e

Forum posts: 1.004 Member has been banned

Casinotest 24 back?

22nd Aug. 2018, at 12:22 pm CEST#15

1 Like

Liked this post: Anonym

Yes, I see the same, Ronny! Again this typical double standard.

@Royal777

To me you are a casino tester troll anyway.
Almost every thread of yours so far has been about defending him. And be it
with questionable arguments. Everyone can read it on your site.
Therefore, one can take you zero seriously.

For this you would not have to register here!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Former Member

Casinotest 24 back?

22nd Aug. 2018, at 03:32 pm CEST#16

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

stkrie wrote on 08/22/2018 at 12:22 pm: Yes, I agree, Ronny! Again this typical double standard.

@Royal777

To me you are a casino tester troll anyway.
Almost every thread of yours so far has been about defending him. And be it
with questionable arguments. Everyone can read it on your site.
Therefore, one can take you zero seriously.

For this you would not have to register here!

Call me what you want. That one holds facts and facts here in Germany for not worth mentioning belongs meanwhile to the everyday life. Instead, one forms his opinion on the basis of assumptions and speculations.

Too bad that there is no one here in the thread who is interested in the truth.

So, where is the evidence? Where is the prosecution? Where are the lawyers who wanted to take care of it? As always, there is no answer to this question.

Instead you rhyme here again some things together... "Lapalingo gives him higher wins" // "Royal&Co are CasinotesterTrolls" // "Players are not paid out because they have demonstrably violated the terms and conditions" ... What a nonsense!

"As Troll one designates in the net jargon a person, who their communication in the xml-ph-0753@deepl.inte "
So if anyone is trolling here, it's you. Examples were mentioned above.

The presumption of innocence still applies! Whereby there is not even the approach of an indictment!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Former Member

Casinotest 24 back?

22nd Aug. 2018, at 03:40 pm CEST#17

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Royal777 wrote on 08/22/2018 at 3:32 PM
Call me what you want. That people here in Germany consider facts and facts not worth mentioning is now part of everyday life. Instead, one forms his opinion based on assumptions and speculations.

Too bad that there is no one here in the thread who is interested in the truth.

So, where is the evidence? Where is the prosecution? Where are the lawyers who wanted to take care of it? As always, there is no answer to this question.

Instead you rhyme here again some things together... "Lapalingo gives him higher wins" // "Royal&Co are CasinotesterTrolls" // "Players are not paid out because they have demonstrably violated the terms and conditions" ... What a nonsense!

"As Troll one calls in the net jargon a person, which its communication in the xml-ph-0751@deepl.inte "
So if anyone here is trolling, it's you. Examples were mentioned above.

The presumption of innocence still applies! Whereby there is not even the approach of an indictment!

Yes, I am interested in the truth. Shoot.

And of course players don't get paid because they violate T&Cs. That happens in almost every complaint thread.

However, I am interested in why you write exclusively on this topic.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e

Forum posts: 1.004 Member has been banned

Casinotest 24 back?

22nd Aug. 2018, at 03:53 pm CEST#18

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Casinotester charges are subject to a petition offense, and are not automatically prosecuted by the judicial system.

So who is interested in filing a criminal complaint because of a little naughty child?

Therefore, there is no indictment, and not because you little troll thinks he has not violated anything.

You should inform yourself better before, otherwise it is embarrassing.

By the way, this is a fact, not an assumption.
Do you get money to defend the child here?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Former Member

Casinotest 24 back?

22nd Aug. 2018, at 04:34 pm CEST#19

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Zockertyp89 wrote on 08/22/2018 at 3:40 pm
Yes you do, I am interested in the truth. Shoot.

And of course players don't get paid because they violate T&Cs. That comes up in almost every complaint thread.

However, I am interested in why you write exclusively on this topic.

Look for my first post on the forum, because that was the reason I registered. There is no great interest in an active participation of the forum community. Although I'm also interested in other topics, I don't want to get involved with gambling again as variously .

Besides, I don't know of any other forums where CT24 is discussed in such detail.

@stkrie No, neither I nor others are paid. And I am still not a troll. But to troll your comment fits perfectly again

As in the comment before, I can refute any pointless claim.
Here you talk about how he made his comeback with a €10,000 Deposit and landed a €15,000 hit due to the support of Lapalingo. The losses are not even mentioned, otherwise a completely different picture of him would arise.

1. His comeback was one day before and he lost a four-digit sum
2. Lapalingo certainly doesn't give him a better RTP.
3. He has apparently not only a new Acc. at Lapa, but also on other platforms eg Youtube
4. He was prevented in recent weeks and months due to the move to Malta! Everything else is speculation, period.

NOBODY finances his life. Anyone can sign up FREELY through his links.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e

Forum posts: 1.004 Member has been banned

Casinotest 24 back?

22nd Aug. 2018, at 05:01 pm CEST#20

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Speculation, lol.
Sure, it was all pure coincidence that now that he's 18, he's suddenly back on.

Can you be fooled that easily?
God, ha ha.
Flee yes so some to malta....
One is left more in peace.
German justice is more annoying, I know

But I find that sooooo sweet, as you defend him
defend him. Is it your little brother?

He has cheated and lied to everyone.
And if you still say a thousand times what against it.
I do not care!

Ind whether he won yesterday or not, has never been the subject of my post, but the fact that he gambled as a u18-year-old publicly, and thus fooled everyone.

He can lose everything.
The sooner such a person disappears from the picture, the better.
Then he'll just have to live on his dad's pocket money again.

This post has been translated automatically

Casinotest 24 back?

Online Casinos in general: Casinotest 24 back? (Page 2)

Casinotest 24 back?

Casinotest 24 back?

Casinotest 24 back?

Casinotest 24 back?

Casinotest 24 back?

Casinotest 24 back?

Casinotest 24 back?

Casinotest 24 back?

Casinotest 24 back?

Best Online Casinos

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 10:28 am CET

Impending ceiling collapse at historic Swiss ...

DGGS: The top-selling slots in October ...

Frankfurt: 100 metres distance between school and arcade ...

GambleJoe Team

Community Forum-Moderators

Forgotten your password?