Of course, the state is not interested in Player protection, but anyone who believes this is beyond help.
Real player protection would look like simply banning everything that has to do with gambling and closing all the booths, no OCs, no gambling halls, no casinos, no lottery, no more competitions where you have to pay first to be able to take part.
I honestly wouldn't mind, at first it will of course be very difficult for a gambler, but with time he will gradually realize that it was really the best thing that could have happened to him.
You have money and appreciate it again and your psyche will also thank you.
CashOut wrote on 28.11.2023 at 18:17: Of course, the state is not interested in Player protection - anyone who believes this is beyond help.
Real player protection would look like simply banning everything that has to do with gambling and closing all the booths, no OCs, no arcades, no casinos, no lottery, no more competitions where you have to pay first to participate.
I honestly wouldn't mind, at first it will of course be very difficult for a gambler, but with time he will gradually realize that it was really the best thing that could have happened to him.
You have money and appreciate it again and your psyche will thank you for it.
I can only speak for myself, but when all the halls were closed, for example, I didn't miss the fun - I think if there's no opportunity and the others can't play either, it won't be difficult to give it up
Of course I can't judge what it's like for a hardcore addict, but since we're all addicted to some extent, I think there's something to it
CashOut wrote on 28.11.2023 at 18:17: Of course, the state is not interested in Player protection - anyone who believes that is beyond help.
Real player protection would look like simply banning everything that has to do with gambling and closing all the booths, no OCs, no arcades, no casinos, no lottery, no more competitions where you have to pay first to be able to participate.
I honestly wouldn't mind, at first it will of course be very difficult for a gambler, but over time he will gradually realize that it was really the best thing that could have happened to him.
You have money and appreciate it again and your psyche will also thank you for it.
I am generally against bans and excessive paternalism by the state, but when it comes to gambling I also tend towards zero tolerance.
No one would be deprived of anything (i.e. no gambler) if gambling no longer existed. Gambling is a sick system that is structured in such a way that you can only lose.
If I gave you €1 and you had to give me €2 in return and we took turns playing this game over and over again, you would never agree to such a game.
And this is exactly how gambling works.
The only difference is that in a game of chance, the rounds don't run one after the other, but can be such that you win the €1 four times in a row and then have to pay the €2 three times. Or ten times in a row or twenty times - it doesn't matter. Mathematically speaking, it is exactly the same (only with different percentages) as if you were to alternate the rounds. However, this fact is disguised by pretty pictures.
On the other hand, I am of course fully aware that a ban on gambling has never worked and that there will always be a black market, which is why I tend to favor legality again. Especially in the online era, a ban is almost hopeless. We should therefore at least try to provide the best possible protection for those players who voluntarily no longer want to take part in the game.
I think the Oasis ban is a good start. Now we just need to manage to implement a similar system for all casinos (Curacao, Malta, etc.).
Then all those who want to play should be able to play and all those who no longer want to play should have an easy way to exclude themselves completely.
CashOut wrote on 27.09.2023 at 15:41: Book of Dead hasn't been running for 1-2 years like it used to, even without a German license. I don't know what they did to the game but I feel like I have to do 1000 spins for 2 Scatters to appear at all.
I can only agree PlaynGo is absolute garbage with rather 50% real RTP and less with several 100/1000 spins....you shouldn't touch the garbage anymore
Can you make big wins at German licensed casinos?
Liked this post: Tonkabohne
Real player protection would look like simply banning everything that has to do with gambling and closing all the booths, no OCs, no gambling halls, no casinos, no lottery, no more competitions where you have to pay first to be able to take part.
I honestly wouldn't mind, at first it will of course be very difficult for a gambler, but with time he will gradually realize that it was really the best thing that could have happened to him.
You have money and appreciate it again and your psyche will also thank you.
This post has been translated automatically
Can you make big wins at German licensed casinos?
Liked this post: Tonkabohne, Unique
I can only speak for myself, but when all the halls were closed, for example, I didn't miss the fun - I think if there's no opportunity and the others can't play either, it won't be difficult to give it up
Of course I can't judge what it's like for a hardcore addict, but since we're all addicted to some extent, I think there's something to it
This post has been translated automatically
Can you make big wins at German licensed casinos?
Liked this post: CashOut, Unique
I am generally against bans and excessive paternalism by the state, but when it comes to gambling I also tend towards zero tolerance.
No one would be deprived of anything (i.e. no gambler) if gambling no longer existed. Gambling is a sick system that is structured in such a way that you can only lose.
If I gave you €1 and you had to give me €2 in return and we took turns playing this game over and over again, you would never agree to such a game.
And this is exactly how gambling works.
The only difference is that in a game of chance, the rounds don't run one after the other, but can be such that you win the €1 four times in a row and then have to pay the €2 three times. Or ten times in a row or twenty times - it doesn't matter. Mathematically speaking, it is exactly the same (only with different percentages) as if you were to alternate the rounds. However, this fact is disguised by pretty pictures.
On the other hand, I am of course fully aware that a ban on gambling has never worked and that there will always be a black market, which is why I tend to favor legality again. Especially in the online era, a ban is almost hopeless. We should therefore at least try to provide the best possible protection for those players who voluntarily no longer want to take part in the game.
I think the Oasis ban is a good start. Now we just need to manage to implement a similar system for all casinos (Curacao, Malta, etc.).
Then all those who want to play should be able to play and all those who no longer want to play should have an easy way to exclude themselves completely.
This post has been translated automatically
Can you make big wins at German licensed casinos?
Liked this post: Unique
I can only agree PlaynGo is absolute garbage with rather 50% real RTP and less with several 100/1000 spins....you shouldn't touch the garbage anymore
This post has been translated automatically