Online Casinos in general: 5.3% taxes are destroying online casinos and therefore need to be abolished urgently (Page 3)

This post has been translated automatically

zocker1414 wrote on 05/03/2022 at 20:41

What alternatives are there for the protection of minors, which is just times regulation? Normally, this is the responsibility of parents,

something to control, or regulating intervene.

It's sad enough that the state has to do this
And how else is it supposed to do it?

If the porn site does not show understanding, or is not willing to compromise, it will be blocked. You can do the same in any other
european country the same way. To think that this is only possible in North Korea is a utopia.

This post has been translated automatically

Krabbenburger wrote on 06/03/2022 at 00:22
Of course, youth protection is the task of parents .
What makes you think that the state must do that?
Your statement that would be the same in any other country of the EU is also wrong. Internet locks are an absolute rarity in countries of the EU.
Apart from the fact that it is pointless, because there are 10,000 websites with identical content.
Your last sentence makes no sense at all. Maybe you should google the meaning of the word " utopia "
Or was that a Freudian slip and North Korea is a utopia for you ?
There the state really takes care of everything .

This post has been translated automatically

Krabbenburger wrote on 05.03.2022 at 18:15
The casino does not make a loss when it passes the tax on to the player .
There are 2 ways it can do that .
Either directly deduct 5.3% from the bet or the casino reduces the RTP .
An example: Tipico does not charge a direct fee but has very low RTPs, say 90%.
At N1 there is the direct fee deduction of 5.3% but the slots have a higher RTP on a game basis. Let's say the slot that runs at Tipico with 90% RTP, runs at N1 with 95.3% but they deduct 5.3% on each spin (so 95.3 -5.3 = 90%). The result is that you play in both casinos with 90% RTP.
It does not matter if it is collected by fees or if the RTP of the slot is lowered. The result is a very low RTP where players lose more than double compared to before.

Since it bothers you ( rightly ) I wonder why you play in casinos with low RTP or fee ?
There are countless casinos where you can gamble without this crap .

This post has been translated automatically

zocker1414 wrote on 06/03/2022 at 11:22 AM
The CPC regulation of the EU regulates the blocking of pages. So it is unlikely to be used by Germany.


And years before, the ECJ has held website blocking to be legitimate if it protects the rights of
Consumers are protected. Example is kinox.to

And since the protection of minors is also a high priority, and the operator of the site does not react, it is pointless to speak of
To speak of censorship. All that would have to be done is to install youth protection

The state has to take over when parents don't care and it is discovered how easy it is for young people to get porn
young people can get porn. The other sites will also be blocked if they do not cooperate
cooperate.

But I can always blame the others, of course.

And it is applied in other European countries as well, as it has been for years by the USA.
Please inform correctly!

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

zocker1414 wrote on 06.03.2022 at 12:57 pm: If you have a store, and constantly sell alcohol to young people, then you get warnings,
Fines, and eventually you will be shut down. It's a very normal process.

You have to verify your age on so many non-pornographic sites that it is almost idiotic to discuss it
to discuss about it. Protection of minors is a good thing. The state has fulfilled its mandate, and
if the young people get porn differently (of course they do), the state can not care for the time being.

You argue like: you can get all kinds of drugs illegally, so the state doesn't need to interfere
interfere.


You are also a believer in the state, otherwise you would be in jail or emigrated

Apart from that, you are constantly patronized, even as an adult.

This post has been translated automatically

Krabbenburger wrote on 06.03.2022 at 13:21
You do it again you compare drugs ( something illegal ) with youth protection.
This is totally wrong and misses the point .
. The site is not closed only for German visitors
From any other EU country you can visit the site . Only Germany not.
To stay with your store comparison would be as if the store had a sign in front German may not enter but everyone else already.
And of course you can criticize this state and find many things bad without being in jail or emigrating
This is really complete nonsense.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically