Online Casinos in general: 5.3% taxes are destroying online casinos and therefore need to be abolished urgently (Page 2)

Falko wrote on 05.03.2022 at 19:52
Let's make the task easier, maybe someone here can answer the result. You pay 10 euros into the casino and make 500 spins for 10 cents each. So you spin a total of 500x10 cents = 50 euros. What is the amount of tax that is due here ?

This post has been translated automatically

Skitch22 wrote on 05.03.2022 at 20:09:5€ you have then less. Many levy yes even on 10 cents per turn this 5.3% tax.

This post has been translated automatically

Skitch22 wrote on 05.03.2022 at 20:09
5€ that one has then less. Many levy yes even on 10 cents per turn this 5.3% tax.

This post has been translated automatically

Krabbenburger wrote on 05.03.2022 at 20:08:2,65€

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Sebi123 wrote on 05.03.2022 at 20:21: I am also against the tax or as it was now implemented.
It would have been better immediately at the Deposit to deduct the tax and good is not after each spin then wins are tax free ..
I'm afraid but the state will not get rid of the tax more so the tax will probably unfortunately remain I think

Exciting is of course now how it continues with the Curacao casinos where the tax is not levied.

I mean the state taxes all Malta casinos and leaves the Curacao casinos just so tax free or how that leads but that more and more players will switch to the Curacao casinos and the state by the Malta casinos nothing more takes by the 5;3 percent tax.

I think that it boils down to the Curacao casinos are blocked for the German n players unfortunately unfortunately otherwise makes but that with the tax but no sense.

Or one says also the Curacao casinos are taxed with 5.3 for it but as a compromise one says the taxation of the Malta and the Curacao casinos takes place evenly with the deposit and then also not with each spin etc.

Advantage for the state would be that no player goes through the rags because playing in the Curacao casino and the player can play in a Malta or Curacao

I think times in exactly one year we know more whether it really comes to the blocking of the Curacao Casinos on the part of the gambling authority hall or not I hope it of course also not but...

This post has been translated automatically

Sebi123 wrote on 05.03.2022 at 20:21: I am also against the tax or as it was now implemented.
It would have been better immediately with the Deposit to deduct the tax and good is not after each spin then wins are tax free ..
I'm afraid but the state will not get rid of the tax more so the tax will probably unfortunately remain I think

Exciting is of course now how it continues with the Curacao casinos where the tax is not levied.

I mean the state taxes all Malta casinos and leaves the Curacao casinos just so tax free or how that leads but that more and more players will switch to the Curacao casinos and the state by the Malta casinos nothing more takes by the 5;3 percent tax.

I think that it boils down to the Curacao casinos are blocked for the German n players unfortunately unfortunately otherwise makes but that with the tax but no sense.

Or one says also the Curacao casinos are taxed with 5.3 for it but as a compromise one says the taxation of Malta and the Curacao casinos takes place evenly with the deposit and then also not with each spin etc.

Advantage for the state would be that no player goes through the rags because playing in the Curacao casino and the player can play in a Malta or Curacao

I think times in exactly one year we know more whether it really comes to the blocking of the Curacao Casinos on the part of the gambling authority hall or not I hope it of course also not but...

This post has been translated automatically

Krabbenburger wrote on 05.03.2022 at 20:32
There was just the news that a porn site was blocked by the Youth Protection Commission.
This authority wanted that the porn site of their users identity cards required to determine their age
The website refused and now the site is blocked by the DNS server of the internet provider.
A fatal sign when websites are blocked by a state. Even if it is only a porn site.
Maybe this kind of censorship will be extended to other areas.
As it is called so beautifully: " Freedom always dies centimeter by centimeter ".
And of course you can easily bypass a DNS block even without VPN .
But it is still a fatal sign .

This post has been translated automatically