Online Casinos in general: 15.10.2020 - Casino Deadline Day? All over? (Page 30)

unicorn wrote on 11.10.2020 at 10:28 am
Exactly that tempts yes not to pay out your balance, because you can only Deposit 500 in the same month, no matter how much win you pay out. If someone deposits directly at the beginning of the month the 1000€ and comes for example on 2000€, he will ask himself the question whether it is now worthwhile to pay out with the condition that one can play the rest of the month no more. Many will therefore rather continue to gamble with the balance and in the end lose everything. There should rather be a 1000€ loss limit as a deposit limit

This post has been translated automatically

unicorn wrote on 11.10.2020 at 10:28 am
Exactly that tempts yes not to pay out your balance, because you can only Deposit 500 in the same month, no matter how much win you pay out. If someone deposits directly at the beginning of the month the 1000€ and comes for example on 2000€, he will ask himself the question whether it is now worthwhile to pay out with the condition that one can play the rest of the month no more. Many will therefore rather continue to gamble with the balance and in the end lose everything. Therefore, there should rather be a 1000€ loss limit as a deposit limit

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

RebellYell wrote on 11.10.2020 at 10:51
And I had once understood it exactly that this 1000 euro loss limit is coming, casino over free. That there is now 1000 euro Deposit limit is new to me.

This post has been translated automatically

unicorn wrote on 11/10/2020 at 11:02 am
Some say Deposit limit, others say loss limit. No idea which is coming, but lean towards the deposit limit as it is easier to track. Should the rule be introduced across casinos, then probably the deposit limit will come, because a Provider-spanning win and loss statement probably makes little sense.

This post has been translated automatically

gear wrote on 11/10/2020 at 11:25 AM

It's all in the proposed contract, which is before the EU:


page 16/17, §6c - self-limitation

(1) When registering, the player shall set a Deposit limit up to a maximum of 1,000 euros. And this across providers! If the cumulative deposits in a calendar month to all organizers of Games of chance on the Internet are reached, a further deposit may not be made.

Page 21, §6h - Parallel gaming
(1) Parallel gaming of games of chance is prohibited
(2) Prevention by blocking file that shows whether a player is grad active
(3) "active" is removed from the file after five minutes. Means that there is a waiting period when a change occurs. After 30 minutes without entering the player, "inactive" is also created.


page 39/40, §22a - Virtual machine games
(1) Offering a slot requires the permission of the competent authority. Each slot is therefore checked
(2) A distinction is made here between the Internet and casinos. Everything Slot, Table games etc., which are in gaming halls, are inadmissible
(3) In addition to the RTP, we then need to get a probability on the maximum win
(4) This is where the auto-play mode is removed. The "declaration" of the player must be made.
(5) Stake and wins only in euros/cents
(6) A game must last 5 seconds on average. It starts with the "declaration" and ends with the display of the result
(7) The stake must not exceed one euro per game. But: The authority can adjust the maximum stake to changed circumstances.
(8) End of jackpots in Germany: A win must consist of a multiple of the stake before the game starts. Nothing may be accumulated to create wins for future games
(9) See §6h. Waiting period of five minutes
(10) Multiple windows and split screens with multiple games in parallel prohibited. Players may only be shown one game at a time
(11) Providers and suppliers may not use the words "casino" and "casino games". This explains the renaming of many casinos.


Page 9, §4c, 1-3 - Bank guarantees

Permission only if there is a bank guarantee in the EU. At least 5 million euros must be deposited. Authority may require up to 50 million collateral depending on expected sales.

Page 10/11, §4d, 4 - Consequences

The Authority may take action in the event of violations of the obligations. Public warning with new deadline, permit suspension for three months, reduction of the permit by one quarter of the term or revocation of the permit. Also applies to companies associated with the owner, which then affects all parties involved.

page 19, §6e - Further provisions for protection
(2) Random number generators shall be tested annually by an independent body at the expense of the license holder
(3) (4) The license holder must offer a ".de" domain for Germany. The license must be visible on the home page. All information must be in German.

Page 45/46, §27a - Contact person

On July 1, 2021, Saxony-Anhalt will establish an institution under public law. "Joint Gaming Authority of the Federal States" with its own official seal.




Just a brief excerpt from the proposed treaty. If everything goes like this, I think Germany will have the
by far the strongest license!

This post has been translated automatically

Mo1985 wrote on 10/10/2020 at 19:01: Btw I find the rules TOP! I have no desire
more on the shit. Because of me they can make limit 500€.

Next it will be Skrill and Co anyway to the collar because of money laundering prevention. Everybody who withdraws money from gambling via wallets bypassing the state with plastic cards is doing money laundering - that's a fact. Actually, taxes would even be due on this, because taxes always have to be paid on illegal income. But it won't come to that, at least not in retrospect

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

gear wrote on 10/11/2020 at 1:25 pm

-- post of a double account has been removed --

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically