Who finds the reminder by mail strange: there is still something to come by mail And who takes the collection lightly, because there is supposedly nothing happens, because it's so in forums, should not listen to it. The always immediately contradict (if one has no open claims or the amount is wrong). You can do this by mail. If there is no answer after a few days, send a registered letter by mail. But as you can read here, an objection probably won't help, since you seem to have gotten the money back. So bite the bullet, Skrill gets the money anyway. If you are not liquid, you can also ask for an installment of e.g. 30 Euro.
sippi wrote on 07.12.2021 at 16:31: Who finds the reminder by mail strange: there is still something by mail after And who takes the collection lightly, because there's supposedly nothing happens, because it's so in forums, which should not listen to it. The always immediately contradict (if one has no open claims or the amount is wrong). You can do this by mail. If there is no answer after a few days, send a registered letter by mail. But as you can read here, an objection probably won't help, since you seem to have gotten the money back. So bite the bullet, Skrill gets the money anyway. If you are not liquid, you can also ask for an installment of e.g. 30 Euro.
Of course, you should only appeal if the claim is not justified, everything else would be stupid unless the claim is over 3 years old, then it should be barred if it is not titled
But as can be read here, an objection probably does not help anything, since you had apparently got the money back. So bite the bullet, Skrill gets the money either way. Who is not liquid, can also 'ne installment payment of eg 30 euros request.
It depends strongly on the general conditions. A lawsuit before the AG does not cost the world if you lose. At the same time, Skrill runs maximum Risk if the verdict is in favor of the "player"
Be that as it may: There are verdicts in favor of Skrill (LG Ulm, AG Ebersberg), where the legal representation was very clumsy or non-existent. In addition, judgments where there is a strange connection between the large number of lawyers in the city and the judgments a.d. there courts;)
In my case, I do not assume that Skrill will file a lawsuit. A positive verdict will bring them some money, a negative verdict will likely lead to bigger problems due to the paper walls and proximity to political decision makers. Not to mention a subsequent chargeback.
DieWunderharke5000 wrote on 07.12.2021 at 23:52: The crucial question is, have you or your bank ever charged back money from Skrill or not? They don't just randomly send out reminders to random customers, do they?
And if it came to the hearing including judgement like Rebellady did, there will have been something to the claim, won't there?
My bank has indeed canceled payments and I have not checked. I didn't check my checking account all the time.
Thought I was really in the right, but nope. Fiddlesticks. And in case anyone doesn't believe it... I still have the summons from the court. Skrill against ****** 🤣👌
DieWunderharke5000 wrote on 07.12.2021 at 23:52: The crucial question is, have you or your bank ever charged back money from Skrill or not? They don't just randomly send out reminders to random customers, do they?
And if it came to the hearing including judgement like with Rebellady, there will have been something to the claim, won't there?
One must differentiate very exactly, on what the demand is based and on which way the negative balance came about. This varies greatly, especially with regard to involvement in illegal gambling.
Furthermore, it sounds to me as if Rebellady did not go to trial, but there was a much too late appeal against the enforcement order (not order to pay). If a judgment was actually pronounced, the AZ would be interesting. The procedure at Rebellady reads as if the defense against the claim was not optimally pursued. However, it must be added that many 08/15 lawyers have no idea of the matter and advise to simply pay the amount.
The pressure with lawyers, illegal Schufa entries and other threats is of course high, so it is all the more important not to lose your nerve, file a legally secure objection and then analyze the matter in a "relaxed" manner.
Current status with me is that I have sent the objection to advaro and now wait what comes now
With Skrill itself I am in email contact but they are so incompetent and absolutely not helpful. Although they have the transaction history and can see that I have already paid my "debt" at that time, they want a bank statement from 2020
I had to request this in writing from my former bank. I am now waiting for this so that I can forward the Skrill
Caterpillar wrote on 12/19/2021 at 6:31 PM: Since someone just asked...
A little update.
My current status is that I have sent the objection to advaro and am now waiting to see what happens
With Skrill itself I am in email contact but they are so incompetent and absolutely not helpful. Although they have the transaction history and can see that I have already paid my "debt" at that time, they want a bank statement from 2020
I had to request this in writing from my former bank. I am now waiting for this so that I can forward the Skrill
The coolest thing is yes such things always happen when holidays are pending -.-
Also got email yesterday... 590 euro. It was booked back in November because of lack of coverage some payments. Since I have no bock on negative Schufa I will pay it back in installments
Reminder received from Skrill
Nobody has liked this post so far
Okey, so first wait and do not go crazy.
This post has been translated automatically
Reminder received from Skrill
Liked this post: Chrizzi, Jubla2014, Rebelllady26, Tobsen
This post has been translated automatically
Reminder received from Skrill
Nobody has liked this post so far
Of course, you should only appeal if the claim is not justified, everything else would be stupid unless the claim is over 3 years old, then it should be barred if it is not titled
This post has been translated automatically
Reminder received from Skrill
Nobody has liked this post so far
It depends strongly on the general conditions. A lawsuit before the AG does not cost the world if you lose. At the same time, Skrill runs maximum Risk if the verdict is in favor of the "player"
Be that as it may: There are verdicts in favor of Skrill (LG Ulm, AG Ebersberg), where the legal representation was very clumsy or non-existent. In addition, judgments where there is a strange connection between the large number of lawyers in the city and the judgments a.d. there courts;)
In my case, I do not assume that Skrill will file a lawsuit. A positive verdict will bring them some money, a negative verdict will likely lead to bigger problems due to the paper walls and proximity to political decision makers. Not to mention a subsequent chargeback.
This post has been translated automatically
Reminder received from Skrill
Nobody has liked this post so far
And if it came like with Rebellady to the hearing including judgement, there must have been something to the claim, isn't it?
This post has been translated automatically
Reminder received from Skrill
Nobody has liked this post so far
My bank has indeed canceled payments and I have not checked. I didn't check my checking account all the time.
Thought I was really in the right, but nope. Fiddlesticks. And in case anyone doesn't believe it... I still have the summons from the court. Skrill against ****** 🤣👌
This post has been translated automatically
Reminder received from Skrill
Nobody has liked this post so far
One must differentiate very exactly, on what the demand is based and on which way the negative balance came about. This varies greatly, especially with regard to involvement in illegal gambling.
Furthermore, it sounds to me as if Rebellady did not go to trial, but there was a much too late appeal against the enforcement order (not order to pay). If a judgment was actually pronounced, the AZ would be interesting. The procedure at Rebellady reads as if the defense against the claim was not optimally pursued. However, it must be added that many 08/15 lawyers have no idea of the matter and advise to simply pay the amount.
The pressure with lawyers, illegal Schufa entries and other threats is of course high, so it is all the more important not to lose your nerve, file a legally secure objection and then analyze the matter in a "relaxed" manner.
This post has been translated automatically
Reminder received from Skrill
Nobody has liked this post so far
A small update.
Current status with me is that I have sent the objection to advaro and now wait what comes now
With Skrill itself I am in email contact but they are so incompetent and absolutely not helpful. Although they have the transaction history and can see that I have already paid my "debt" at that time, they want a bank statement from 2020
I had to request this in writing from my former bank. I am now waiting for this so that I can forward the Skrill
This post has been translated automatically
Reminder received from Skrill
Nobody has liked this post so far
The coolest thing is yes such things always happen when holidays are pending -.-
Keep your fingers crossed
This post has been translated automatically
Reminder received from Skrill
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically