Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Deposit and withdrawal methods: Casumo refuses to pay out around €7,100 (Page 4)

Topic created on 05th Jul. 2018 | Page: 4 of 4 | Answers: 39 | Views: 14,574
Anonym
thelastgambler wrote on 07/07/2018 at 08:59: I find the discussion here increasingly strange.

From my point of view the comparison with Mediamarkt does not apply, because at least so far no problems with money laundering became known there. Also, I haven't heard of several thousand TV addicts in Germany destroying entire lives and families - we're talking about gambling here, which is something else.

just look at the rules for the prevention of money laundering. it says there, for example:

casinos have to start due diligence from transactions of 2,000€. the set explains in more detail what this means, among other things, the Source of Funds should also be disclosed.

it would be nice if the thread creator once comments on how he deposited. if he deposited 7000€ in 200€ increments and then 7000€ was let out, the system will not have jumped on until the payout. i have the same problem sometimes when i Deposit 5000€ in one go, so i always log in first, verify myself and then deposit.

usually the support gives you different options to show the origin of the money. i just present a bank statement of one month and show all the money received - let them know everything, i have nothing to hide and i am sure that NSA or Mosshad already know the data anyway.

by the way something like this was already discussed here once in february, when it was about the italian mafia in a text, since some also no longer wanted to play at this or that casino - now the same calls are loud again - yawn...

i would like to see the thread creator get in touch or is he no longer interested in solving the problem. usually the support is relatively nice to high rollers and helps them, they are usually good players for them

I don't know what you find so strange about it now, when people find it questionable that only with payouts any proof of income is required, which up to now no one has been interested in.

What I find much stranger is your explanation with the deposit in 200 steps and the associated "gating of the system only at payout".

What kind of reasoning is that supposed to be?

Then I could deposit 1 million euros in increments of 100 and no one would be interested? And if there is a payout, the alarm bells ring. If there is no payout, it is also okay and I can deposit my 2nd million.

But when paying out, it suddenly becomes apparent that there is Player protection and money laundering. Is clear

If one is actually willing to take action against money laundering, then such a check must be transparent and not so arbitrary.

LG

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
@thelastgambler

What sense does it make if I win 5000€ with a 20€ Deposit, and then supposedly have to
must be verified because of the money laundering law? After all, I did not deposit 5020€, but 20€.
I also do not believe that the Money Laundering Act so provides, but it is interpreted by the
Casinos so interpreted. You can see that many already need a proof of 500€ with the reference
on the money laundering law. Some need this only with over 2,000€ win.
So complete nonsense.

If he had lost everything now, would a rooster have crowed about it???

I've written it here before, it would make much more sense if the casino proves to me,
where it has the 5000€! After all, I do not want to be involved in criminal activities!

Everything else is just nonsense and rauszögerei. How many people gamble away their money again until they are
are verified? Do not believe that a casino would like to do without it.
If it really wanted to comply with the Money Laundering Act, you would have to verify your identity
verify. Then the casino would have no Risk at all. But as already said, the payouts
then went faster, fewer would gamble away their money again. So a minus business for the casino.

The only really sensible check would be if someone deposited, for example, 10,000 €, and directly wants to
would like to pay out. Does not apply to this case but also!

This post has been translated automatically

m****e
Hello,

and thank you very much for dealing with my situation in such a constructive way.

I had deposited with my credit card, more or less, in increments of thousands.

I can't really explain it, I assume it was a coincidence, but a few hours after I opened my thread here, all proofs were accepted by Casumo???

I thereby a little more relaxed, but ultimately the money was not yet back in my account. To avoid further problems, I made the withdrawals in almost the same amounts as when I deposited. Today I saw the first payments from Casumo on my account.

Thank God, everything went well after all. But I don't wish such a nail-biter to my worst enemy.

On the evening of the game, I came back from a party, not quite sober anymore. In connection with my latent gambling passion, I celebrated my 18th birthday in the casino (Bad Bentheim in the good old days). At that time it was still a totally relaxed casino and there were these tin booths, Dortmund - Duisburg etc. not yet at all. So everything came together on this said evening and the chaos took its course.

However, as it looks I got away again with a black eye.

I am very positively impressed by your comments and will visit the forum again in the future. But certainly no longer for the same reason!!!

So again, many thanks and warm greetings

This post has been translated automatically

Tropper
Top Member
Casumo is reading this, maybe they made a mistake and corrected it immediately.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Well you see again everything went well

This post has been translated automatically

thebutcher85
Amateur
is but nothing special that casinos want to have something like that I had already at higher deposits. did not leo vegas have to pay a hefty fine because they have not checked the people and could Deposit as they wanted? it's not about that demand something like that if someone 50 € deposited and 20000 € wants to pay out . but as it looks in this case 7000 € were deposited in one night there you can already ask where the money comes from.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
thebutcher85 wrote on 10.07.2018 at 13:42 clock: is but nothing special that casinos want to have something like that I had already with higher deposits. did not leo Vegas have to pay a hefty fine because they have not checked the people and could Deposit as they wanted ? it's also not about that they demand something like that if someone pays 50 € and 20000 € wants to pay out . but as it looks in this case 7000 € were paid in one night there you can already ask where the money comes from.

Not only Leo Vegas but also some other casinos. Especially the UK Gambling Commission is already taking action. I honestly think that this behavior speaks more for the competence of Casumo than against it. However, it should have gone a little faster with the payout.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
Funny only that, as always, the question comes only at the time of withdrawal, and not
with the deposit. It is as always the double standard of the casinos.

Therefore, a defense of the casino is in my opinion completely out of place.

The UK Gambling Commission hardly intervenes at all.
Otherwise, casinos about which there are constant complaints would have been blocked long ago, or the
MGA would refuse to reissue the seal.

This does not happen - ergo: the whole thing is a joke!

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
The UK and MGA are also two completely different stories. One has nothing to do with the other. The UK Gambling Commission very regularly issues fines for violations such as permitted double registrations or no Deposit control.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
That's right, I meant the MGA. I don't have any experience with the UK yet.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Dec. 2024 at 08:55 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately