Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Deposit and withdrawal methods: Bank cancels account. (Page 2)

Topic created on 11th Oct. 2018 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 17 | Views: 10,461
Stromberg
Legend
Ichbins2018 wrote on 10/11/2018 at 2:33 PM
So so Mr Stromberg,

doing illegal business (banks) but questioning the creditworthiness of a customer (player)....something doesn't add up here!

Which of the two would you give credit to ?

That's not the point at all
What I think who creditworthiness is not interested
I was only interested in whether Brotkauer has previously weighed whether the benefit is in proportion to the possible harm (to him). I do not want to protect the bank, I do not care...

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
The only important thing is to stop playing after that - the chances to withdraw the first time are good and the chances to get away without penalty. The second time it is very dangerous, it is possible that the bank will terminate the contract and you should be prepared for this case. If you feel cheated out of your money, go ahead, I can understand that. But if you continue to play after that, it is only a small delay and then the problems will really start.

I wish you the best and hope that you get off well in these cases, if you want to play then vllt. 1x a month in a casino drive and ready. When paying out there are usually no problems, you are not tempted to cancel and no bonus offers entice you. Can be that the chances of winning are somewhat lower, but who reduces everything only to winning quickly builds a false expectation and bets higher and higher amounts until you play above your own means and then you only have to have a bad RTP once and you are already "ruined".

Can gladly post how it went with you then.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Ankor wrote on 11/10/2018 at 14:46: The second time it is already very dangerous, it would be possible that the bank terminates after that and you should be prepared for this case.

The termination would still be harmless. The first time, of course, a player can excuse himself that he did not know about §284 and §285 StGB, but the second time this excuse no longer fits, of course, and if then again a chargeback is carried out, then you could also move in the area of §263 StGB, if it goes badly.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Emulator wrote on 11/10/2018 at 15:17
The termination thing would be harmless, after all. The first time, of course, a player can talk his way out that he did not know about §284 and §285 StGB, but the second time, of course, this excuse no longer fits and if then again a chargeback is carried out, then you could also be in the area of §263 StGB, if it goes badly.

Have it badly formulated, can also the first time already that the bank terminates. The second time just the things that you have mentioned. One can get then really criminal consequences.

This post has been translated automatically

Ichbins2018
Top Member
Stromberg wrote on 10/11/2018 at 2:43 PM
That's not the point at all
What I think who is creditworthy is not interested
It was only about whether Brotkauer has previously weighed whether the benefit is in proportion to the possible harm ( for him ). it is not about me to take the bank in protection, I do not care...


I know Mr. Stromberg

In reality, I don't care at all, precisely because my primary concern is to educate people.
Finally, who knows that online gaming is illegal, but does it anyway, gets zero sympathy from me anyway - and as for charge baking,
if you are looking for an absolute opponent of charge back ....here I am!

Who wants to play the game and plays - and he should please also stand up for it.

And that such Klüngels then spread in other forums....just what concerns how they can best accomplish a Charge Back...
then I get already all-inclusive a hate wrinkle.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Ichbins2018 wrote on 11/10/2018 at 15:26
I know Mr. Stromberg

In reality, I also don't care at all, precisely because my first priority is to educate people.
After all, anyone who knows that online gaming is illegal but does it anyway gets zero sympathy from me anyway -and as for chargeback,
if you are looking for an absolute opponent of charge back ....here I am!

Who wants to play the game and plays - and he should please also stand up for it.

And that such Klüngels then spread in other forums....just what concerns how they can best accomplish a Charge Back...
then I get already all-inclusive a hate wrinkle.

Then we understand each other ?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
@Stromberg yes he has ??

First I received as an answer, I have to do myself, but only goes back 8 weeks.
Will take care of me at the weekend times, not to think if that goes ????

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Brotkauer wrote on 11.10.2018 at 13:14: Sodele that I want to know, just gave my bank the order to book back from a Provider all withdrawals, with the indication that it is about transfers to online casino hamdelt

I have a lawyer friend who specializes in gambling told me that he does not know of a single case where they tried to reclaim the funds from the bank. Also, he himself would not even accept such a case because he estimates the chances of success as very low.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Dec. 2024 at 08:34 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately