Public complaints: Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void (Page 9)

This post has been translated automatically

upola wrote on 07/12/2018 at 15:57
I would be interested to know if the users defending the casino are only doing it because someone else is aggrieved.
Would those same users do it if they were the aggrieved party themselves?
I probably won't get an honest answer.
If I did get an honest answer, it would make the whole argument absurd.

This post has been translated automatically

upola wrote on 12/07/2018 at 15:57
I would be interested to know if the users defending the casino are only doing it because someone else is aggrieved.
Would those same users do it if they were the aggrieved party themselves?
I probably won't get an honest answer.
If I did get an honest answer, it would make the whole argument absurd.

This post has been translated automatically

upola wrote on 12/07/2018 at 15:57
I would be interested to know if the users defending the casino are only doing it because someone else is aggrieved.
Would those same users do it if they were the aggrieved party themselves?
I probably won't get an honest answer.
If I did get an honest answer, it would make the whole argument absurd.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg wrote on 12/07/2018 at 16:06
I do not want theCasino in protection, I do not even play there anymore.
However, I take what is there just as clear...


Attention: Even after converting bonus credits into real money credits, the maximum payout amount of the wins is also 100€. This means that the entire balance won with bonus funds can be paid out once up to a maximum of 100€.


I know but also, and I had already mentioned more often, that this was not yet in the terms and conditions, when the first complaints came up here!

This post has been translated automatically

Random wrote on 07/12/2018 at 4:14 PM
And why is there this pointless regulation?

Not even there you get the idea that it could be because their software runs better with bonus?

The regulation has otherwise zero sense.

If the player would have the same chances of winning when he pays out and then deposited again or immediately continues to play with it, you would not need such a rule. Even with something so clear you do not stutzig?

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg wrote on 12/07/2018 at 16:28
Well, that's a different question now.
For me personally, it's not necessarily better with bonus money.
Many it seems to go but so, or I have read more often.
I can not judge.
And of course I also get suspicious about some things and have my own theories about what's going on.
That's probably what most players have.

This post has been translated automatically

Bone wrote on 12/07/2018 at 16:08
As mentioned before I made it through such conditions myself and I got my account balance cut, albeit in a different casino. At that time I had several thousand euros in the account when suddenly it was only 100. I played very high to implement the conditions, have not seen that I have only 100 and have turned again, with 50€ stake. It came a good picture and I was again at about 700€.

Thereupon I wanted to withdraw directly, but honestly not with the hope that I will ever see money, was some Curacao casino or similar and I actually never believed in it. Shortly after came a mail I should send documents and the maximum withdrawal amount is 100€, my balance was cut again. So I still with faint hope times documents submitted. Money came of course never, but that's not the point, it was a very unseriöses casino.

I did not feel cheated to be honest. I just felt like I didn't read the rules. I did check if there was a Maxbet rule but I somehow missed the sentence "The maximum you may withdraw is 100", which was at the top.

I may be different than others here, but I don't play to win money in the first place. I always know that there will never be any cash in my hand, that's okay. That's why something like this doesn't frustrate me. However, I can imagine that I would be p**sed at a reputable casino like Lapalingo and a €8000 win. But at the end of the day, it's not fraud and 100€ is better than nothing.

Question to the TE: Do you actually get at least the 100€ or nothing at all? That would still be interesting.

This post has been translated automatically

upola wrote on 07/12/2018 at 16:48

I honestly don't know what to make of your response.

Either you are really such a person who is not angry about a loss of several thousand euros and does not feel cheated....or you are just telling stories here.
I can't quite place this yet.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically