Public complaints: Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void (Page 11)

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

mike1975 wrote on 07/12/2018 at 17:59
Yeah sure, of course I will go extra to Austria, rent an apartment there and order internet, so that yes I can write with my Austrian IP number from here with a second account

Can you explain me how that should work

So far I found you actually always as one of the reasonable sort here, but somehow you seem to have a problem with yourself must therefore leave it out to others who can actually nothing for it.

Above all, I have long noticed negatively that you constantly insinuate bone that he defends all casinos, which he does not do at all, but he writes only what corresponds to the truth, because if you read through the terms and conditions, especially in the paragraph "bonus conditions", then you would see clearly that you can withdraw a maximum of €100.- and as I said, I know it no different, as that you must first withdraw the money and only then play again normally, without any conditions and win.

At least this has always been the case in RTG casinos, which is why I actually thought that this was completely normal in every casino.

It is only transferred to so-called "real money" so that you can withdraw the amount afterwards, which is not possible as long as the amount is still declared as a bonus.

Sure, it is annoying and this condition is not necessary to understand, just like many other senseless regulations, such as the exclusion of some specific video Slot machines during a bonus.
Because why do they exclude e.g. DOA (Dead Or Alive) almost everywhere, where the Variance is so high anyway and the chance to win something is very low?
Okay, there are also very high wins possible, but from experience you have them maybe 1-2 times in many years. I had there at least after many years playing this slot just 1x 5 Scatters and once a win with 5 wild lines in the free spins, which also brought me something around 2,000x and both times I played with 36 cent bets, but normally I lose my money on this slot faster than anywhere else and even bore me during, because this slot is just totally boring

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

mike1975 wrote on 07/12/2018 at 6:32 PM: --

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

m****5 wrote on 07/12/2018 at 18:32: ----

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Zockertyp89 wrote on 07/12/2018 at 6:34 PM
Wow. That's a felony of yours, by the way.

You are threatening someone with murder here. If Random reports you, it's rightfully so.

This post has been translated automatically

Random wrote on 07/12/2018 at 6:32 pm
I so don't care if you have a good or bad opinion of me.

The complaints section here on Gamble Joe is kind of the draw of Gamblejoe. Most new users sign up here because they have problems with Online Casinos and they hope for help here.

In each of such posts, bone to speak and subliminally insinuates new users that they are stupid, anyway not in the right and are too stupid to read the terms and conditions are so fair.
It is always the same. A user reports with problems. Immediately sincere users write help, advice and give useful tips.
Bone then picks one of these contributions and immediately announces that the player himself is to blame.
The player will then probably no longer report and leaves Gamblejoe disappointed again because he gets no help that he expected and be it only the good encouragement that we also know that some casinos have fraudulent terms and conditions, but you just because of the location can not do anything about it, but we as a community also find that bad and are on the side of the player.
Bone defends the terms and conditions but then to the extreme.

Most of the time he starts his post with: I find this regulation also stupid but......
This is then followed by an eternally longer paragraph where he skillfully turns everything around so that the casino is right somewhere anyway.
All silent readers, especially those who are not yet so familiar with the online world, are also given a picture.
Oh, maybe Wunderino isn't so bad after all, because you're sure to get your money if you do everything right - a statement that bones have prayed down.

Daniel has often mentioned that he wants to improve the casino scene with Gamblejoe sustainable.
But you can't do that by letting a user like Knochen omnipresent here fill every complaint thread and thereby mock new players and always somehow a little bit of schadenfreude resonates.

His posts are always structured according to the same pattern as already described above.
Thus, he spams every thread to the disadvantage of a casino.

He is also not averse to subliminal insults such as calling users paranoid who do not say yes and amen to every nonsensical regulation of the casinos.
Just like you did. The insinuation of paranoia came a few posts before from bones. Suddenly you show up and strike in the same notch. As an introduction you took - completely torn from the facts - that Knochen is such a great stallion because he writes AGB instead of AGBs.
That is at least striking.


And I will not tolerate that here new users are scared away and ridiculed and casinos are taken in protection which can find even more pawn victims to fleece.
For this the range of Gamblejoe is already too large.
And also the forum management should think about it once and whether they want to stay with their principle to want to improve the Casinoscene sustainable.

This post has been translated automatically