-
Langhans_innen, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 10:07 am CET
-
TennisFreak, on 14th Sep. 2024 at 07:52 pm CEST
-
Beccyt69, today at 01:10 am CET
-
frapi07, today at 12:14 am CET
-
gamble1, today at 12:06 am CET
-
Latiluck, yesterday at 11:41 pm CET
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 10:19 pm CET
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 10:17 pm CET
-
Patizi, yesterday at 09:44 pm CET
-
frapi07, yesterday at 08:02 pm CET
-
bigbig, yesterday at 07:59 pm CET
-
danny005, yesterday at 06:07 pm CET
-
Kleinkariert, yesterday at 03:29 pm CET
-
Hanshanshans, yesterday at 03:12 pm CET
-
frapi07, yesterday at 11:17 am CET
-
Jasonknz878, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 11:37 pm CET
-
Jay88, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 07:35 pm CET
-
Pat1991, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 06:53 pm CET
-
Julian, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 06:51 pm CET
-
fischermann, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 08:41 am CET
-
Tanja1987, on 16th Nov. 2024 at 07:44 am CET
-
Donnie, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 02:53 pm CET
-
Casinonutzer1307, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 02:15 pm CET
-
frapi07, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 12:59 pm CET
-
Stromberg, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 09:15 am CET
-
frapi07, on 15th Nov. 2024 at 02:45 am CET
Lapalingo bonus condition met. Refused withdrawal
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo bonus condition met. Refused withdrawal
Nobody has liked this post so far
But it can already look deep that they try it first so.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo bonus condition met. Refused withdrawal
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo bonus condition met. Refused withdrawal
Nobody has liked this post so far
So you would have an effective loss of 150€, instead of 250€, which were not paid out. Can you briefly let me know if you agree? I think more is unfortunately really not in it.
If you don't agree with that, then you can only contact the Malta Gambling Authority and file a complaint there. But I don't know if that makes sense for 150€ ...
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo bonus condition met. Refused withdrawal
Nobody has liked this post so far
The money was real money and therefore no more bonus... What happens then if someone still 500€ nachcasht to the 100€, you keep then in the case of profit also everything...
To which he also got a message: "Have even received the message that payout of the bonus to real money has occurred."
I mean that it would not really need but, if there was actually also payout then it would be doubly clear!
Also that one of all an old offer of 888 (with the worst of the worst) as an example.
They probably prefer to stick the Springer publishing house the money in the ass.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo bonus condition met. Refused withdrawal
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo bonus condition met. Refused withdrawal
Nobody has liked this post so far
at least something
I find honest that Daniel is involved in something like this and you can rely on him
for that
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo bonus condition met. Refused withdrawal
Nobody has liked this post so far
The player has wagered this bonus and had approximately €150 in his player account upon fulfillment of the bonus. As described in the bonus Wagering requirements, the €150 became €100 in real money. He cashed this out, later cancelled it and continued playing. In total, he was able to play his way up to €400, of which he wanted to withdraw €350.
Lapalingo then again cut the real money balance on his player account to €100. According to the statements of Lapalingo, the player must first make a withdrawal and deposit again, because according to the T&C's, otherwise the money is always cut again to 100€ in the event of a win. According to Lapalingo, this procedure is industry standard.
Since this player came from GambleJoe Lapalingo has shown itself accommodating and credited the player € 100 extra without Bedinungen. The player agreed to this.
In my opinion this regulation makes no logical sense and in my opinion the player should have received the complete, missing 250€. After all, Lapalingo has shown itself accommodating and has entered into a compromise in this case.
Last but not least, I think it's a shame that good casinos, which Lapalingo basically is, endanger their reputation with bonus conditions that cannot be understood with a common sense. I personally have an aversion to Bonuses, because bonuses are also the most common reason for most disputes between Online Casinos (with proper license) and players.
If you want to play with a bonus, you should always carefully check the turnover requirements or, if in doubt, refuse it.
This topic has been closed
This post has been translated automatically