Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Public complaints: InterCasino - dubious actions and violation of player protection. (Page 2)

Topic created on 20th Jan. 2018 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 11 | Views: 4,690
Anonym

InterCasino - dubious actions and violation of player protection.

10th Feb. 2018, at 02:47 am CET#11
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Hello... have read through your displeasure and am completely of your opinion. I just hope that the legal fees are worth it. I think that comes very close to the fight David against Goliath. Find it nevertheless good, that you dare to go this step and wish you in this matter much success. I finds also badly, how unscrupulously one tries to enrich itself. Unscrupulous because I think that a self-lock is usually a cry for help, as it is in my cases. One knows exactly that it would be healthier for oneself to invest no more money in the casinos and tries to catch up with a self-lock the almost lost common sense again. If this is then not effective, because the Gambling addiction is completely exploited, I see in it criminality that would be comparable with a Dealer tu. It is so... we are the junkies and the casinos our dealers... where is now the law that protects us? The law may already exist, but there is no one to enforce it, because, as we all know, money makes the world go round. To put it more precisely... our money makes them so rich that they can only pull more out of our pockets. All the best, stay strong.... and best.... Finger away from the dirt.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

InterCasino - dubious actions and violation of player protection.

10th Feb. 2018, at 09:42 pm CET#12
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Random, I can understand exactly what you mean, I admit, I am also an addicted gambler and know the problem and I have also been like that myself, although in other casinos.
But maybe look at it the other way around:

If you would have closed your account completely because of Gambling addiction and would have indicated that, the account would certainly be closed forever.
But you wanted to leave the back door open, so to speak, to try it again soon and therefore did not want to set up a lock forever.
I know what I'm talking about, have often been in the situation myself.

Even if InterCasino does not take it so exactly with the Player protection only YOU are responsible for your actions.
I assume you are at least 18 years old and also responsible for yourself.
Only YOU have clicked on the link to remove the block again, no one has forced you to do so!

Nevertheless, I understand exactly what you mean, but for the own gambling addiction and that one has not under control, to make the casino responsible is pointless. Even if InterCasino is certainly wrong here.

Because look at it this way; If you absolutely want to continue gambling and even if they would have kept the block, then you could have registered within 5 minutes in another casino and Deposit there and play.

I mean we are all in the same boat here and who has the strong desire to play, which will then play somewhere else if the casino does not release the account.

As I said, the moment you even click on the link again and ask the casino to open your account and then deposit again is not to help you.
That is your own decision and so far you have to stick it out, no matter if the casino is supposedly to blame or not.

In other words

If you have, for example, a vehicle, transporter or so and you have a speed limiter installed on 130 km / h (yes there is such a thing) to drive safer and no longer so risky and go to the workshop and can be removed again because you want to drive 180 again, you can not if you build an accident afterwards or are flashed in the workshop and the insult because they have changed again because you wanted it specifically.
Although funny example, but you are still responsible for his own actions.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics18th Nov. 2024 at 03:38 am CET

World
0
Miscellaneous
0
World
0

GambleJoe Team

Profile picture of JulianJulian
Community-Manager / Complaint SpecialistProfile picture of CounterCounter
Software developerProfile picture of MatthiasMatthias
Project manager
Profile picture of DanielDaniel
Founder

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately