Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Public complaints: Fraud: Adlercasino refuses to pay out 225.000€ from jackpot win (Page 14)

Topic created on 22nd Nov. 2017 | Page: 14 of 33 | Answers: 321 | Views: 137,361
Daniel
Elite
That is just my view of things. I do not approve of it at all. From whom did you receive this answer in German? From the MGA or from whom?

If it came from the MGA, then the MGA has made a decision and you unfortunately only have to try it through a lawyer for European or international law.

Let yourself be advised by this times. Initial consultation should not cost more than 175 €. I do not want to go out on a limb when it comes to detailed legal questions. Unfortunately, I have neither the necessary qualifications nor the necessary legal knowledge.

But this just gives me an idea or a dream. If the portal continues to grow, it would be a dream of mine to employ a lawyer for international gambling law, who could advocate for players in such cases free of charge and in the best possible way - in addition to the reach and thus the pressure we could exert on the casinos. We are still very far away from that but you can always dream

This post has been translated automatically

nenad
Amateur
But the fact is that the bonus conditions have been changed just like that and you can't really be serious that this is OK

So if you win a Jackpot of 3.000.000 bsp and they change the terms and conditions to all but Daniel can win is that ok for you?

If you change the terms and conditions during a "neutral negotiation" is that perfectly ok?

Yes logically I am affected and therefore possibly not objective but if you find all this OK it is you also not really

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel
Elite
nenad wrote on 06.12.2017 at 01:51: But the fact is that simply the bonus conditions were changed just like that and you can not really mean seriously that the OK is


So if you win a Jackpot of 3.000.000 bsp and they change the terms and conditions to all but Daniel can win is that ok for you?

If you change the terms and conditions during a "neutral negotiation" is that perfectly ok?

When were the conditions changed?

This post has been translated automatically

nenad
Amateur
Well according to homepage 2016

If you look at my screenshots and videos in the last 2 days

And that is FRAUD

We all discussed 2 or 3 days ago why conditions were displayed at 3500 and not at 7000

Again I understand that you want to stay "neutral" (no offense) but how can you talk about a serious L&L?

The longer they wait and take their time the more I find and others read there also with possibly also affected

And there helps ka MGA more ifs pull off something like that
And at 09:00 sharp I call in malta and if one then still claims that everything is ok on the part of the casino then you can be sure that first the gambling comissoin and then the lawyer are on the line


And this one marketing aunt can also write quietly that I'm sure that with us in Vienna in the zoo chimpanzees train that would have decided smarter

This post has been translated automatically

nenad
Amateur
Go please have now phoned the MGA and statement was
We see that you have been given false information and we agree with you, but we cannot help you
Look for a legal advisor then it looks not bad for them

What are they there for? Only that one more logo on the homepage of the casinos is?

I should try to agree with the casino ðŸ˜'ðŸ˜'ðŸ˜'ðŸ˜'ðŸ˜' there no one talks to me

This post has been translated automatically

DieBlackjackBros
Rookie
So let's just say that the terms and conditions were changed after your win and therefore to your disadvantage?
Is that what you want to tell us with all your confusion?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
DieBlackjackBros wrote on 06.12.2017 at 11:06 am: So let's get this straight, the T&Cs were changed, after your win and therefore to your detriment?
Is that what you want to tell us with all your confusion?

Unfortunately, I can no longer see through here....

This post has been translated automatically

DieBlackjackBros
Rookie
Ronny1982 wrote on 06.12.2017 at 11:09 am
DieBlackjackBros wrote on 06.12.2017 at 11:06: So let's hold on, the T&Cs were changed, after your win and thus to your disadvantage?
Is that what you want to tell us with all your confusion?

Unfortunately, I can no longer see through here....

I think no one does that here anymore xD
If I were you I would just look for a lawyer, I mean if the MGA is already talking about it, no one here will be able to help you. Evidence collect and arrange, off to the lawyer and purely shoot lawsuit.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
If I were the eagle casino I would rather pay out the "manageable" amount than let masses of new players and revenue slip through my fingers due to bad headlines, which hang on the Internet for years to come.

Who pays the there still what in, if the first google entries soon read: Adlercasino refuses to pay out jackpot.
But they must know In the end, the behavior of those is more damaging to business than the amount which they "save"

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Dipson wrote on 06.12.2017 at 11:24 am: If I were the eagle casino I would rather pay out the "manageable" amount than let masses of new players and revenue slip through my fingers due to bad headlines, which yes still hang on the internet for years.

Who pays the there still what in, if the first google entries soon read: Adlercasino refuses to pay out jackpot.
But they must know In the end, the behavior of those is more damaging to business than the amount which they "save"

Have that times googled. Fact, the very first thing that is then displayed. I as a potential new customer would of course leave the fingers of it. I think Adlercasino has gone the completely wrong way.

I would have in this case perhaps simply overlooked the terms and conditions. Is not something really good advertising for a casino if someone has cracked there ne Jackpot? But well..I am not the operator of this casino..I would have made it for me as a hanger and thus can certainly win many new customers.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Dec. 2024 at 06:03 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately