Public complaints: DrückGlück does not pay out 11.000€ due to system error [case solved] (Page 4)

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

stkrie wrote on 02/05/2018 at 14:13: Yes, but do you have any transparency as to what goes between the casino and the MGA
goes back and forth? Have you ever seen a printout so you can understand,
if this is even true?

The MGA itself knows how many casinos have the most impossible terms and conditions, and how often the
the Verification chicanes are used.

I have never heard anything from the MGA as a supervisory authority, that unseriöse
AGB as an example are to be omitted.

That's why this is a joke club for me.

Have for me the same rights as so an allotment association!

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Steve1860 wrote on 02.05.2018 at 14:40: So I can only say that the last time I contacted support I "threatened" to turn on the MGA and not 10 minutes later came the call that the win will be paid out.

Whether this is related I can not say...

This post has been translated automatically

stkrie wrote on 02/05/2018 at 14:47: Why I want transparency????
Is this question serious?????

And yes, there has been enough wheeling and dealing in world history, that's why transparency is so important.
Can a continue to bounce through your life, and believe in the good, I don't care.

Why should you ban certain terms and conditions? Because they are unserious, violate any law,
and the MGA is a regulatory body whose structure and purpose is to regulate, among other things.
in the event of disputes. Otherwise, they would not be needed at all.

And if 1000 complaints come in because of unserious AGb`sreinkommen, should and would have the MGA
also react. That is called a control function.

But the casinos as well as the MGA seem to leave each other more or less alone. Finally
they need each other.

Incidentally, most casinos have in their AGB ` s stand that one is obliged to this
to search for innovations
If it comes to disputes, the decision of the casinomanagement is final, and
can not be disputed.
And the MGA as a supervisory authority is watching.

I had posted something similar before.
If one arranges oneself with the whole attempted Bescheisserei by the AGB`s already, thus consciously in purchase takes,
that you could be cheated, whether bonus, Verification or otherwise, then you should check times,
whether you have a gambling problem.

In the real world, you would no longer order online anywhere if they kept your money and did not deliver any goods.
Here then just change the casino, and it starts all over again! I find that sick!

And I remain: to put the MGA here as Instution, which really judges fairly, is naive!

This post has been translated automatically

Steve1860 wrote on 02/05/2018 at 18:19: @Daniel
I have the promise that it will be paid; however, this only verbally.

But so much confidence I still have that I think that works out then, I'll get back to you in any case as soon as I have the money in the account

This post has been translated automatically