-
frapi07, today at 01:52 pm CEST
-
Majestic69, today at 01:49 pm CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 12:29 pm CEST
-
XuodanayboJanxiXeaee, today at 05:11 pm CEST
-
Patizi, today at 05:09 pm CEST
-
fros7byte, today at 03:40 pm CEST
-
Julian, today at 03:12 pm CEST
-
moody, today at 02:33 pm CEST
-
Tatatola, today at 02:08 pm CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 12:29 pm CEST
-
DiegoGianni, today at 11:33 am CEST
-
JackieNL, today at 11:32 am CEST
-
Marlies123, today at 10:54 am CEST
-
Max_Bet, today at 10:34 am CEST
-
andjoker, yesterday at 09:39 pm CEST
-
bigbig, yesterday at 09:10 pm CEST
-
WithoutWings, yesterday at 07:57 pm CEST
-
agnesaislami, yesterday at 07:51 pm CEST
-
Pneumatic, yesterday at 03:16 pm CEST
-
BigAl87, yesterday at 04:46 am CEST
-
Spielheld, yesterday at 12:53 am CEST
-
MisterL, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 11:45 pm CEST
-
Ceset89, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 09:17 pm CEST
-
Max_Bet, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 04:29 pm CEST
-
Druff, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 03:37 pm CEST
-
Endstation, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 03:24 pm CEST
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
I agree with you, of course.
But I make a slight distinction.
I think a gamble function must always correspond to the actual value.
So if I have red or black, the chance must be exactly 50/50.
Otherwise it is not gambling.
This post has been translated automatically
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
As mentioned before, I have the same experiment once with play money
made. I would have become poor, and can therefore only confirm.
Shocking were the incredible empty rounds of up to 8 at a time, when you actually
one has actually made it to the 24 times.
So the whole thing does not fit at the back and front.
As you say, from the 2 stage are almost three-quarters of the wheel the fields
for advancing. Fits but in reality from the mathematics of the
not at all. Thus a visual fooling around to gambles.
This post has been translated automatically
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hey all good..I just want to say that I experience exactly the same as thebutcher85. Since I always try to 24 works with me from 8 to 12 also around the 80%. I think that's where the Manipulation takes place because every single player is studied, because they know he always presses at 12. ( but who can prove that ) ...for the good would have changed with me only if I had stopped playing 10 years ago ... and of course I don't believe in coincidence, I've experienced too much for that.
This post has been translated automatically
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
Fooling pure !!!
Unless he wants
This post has been translated automatically
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
So, after a long time and many many hours of evaluating my statistics, I can now tell you the following:
I already suspected it myself, but I could not prove it yet.
A friend of mine is a mathematician with a doctorate.
With his help I could now prove that Extra Chilli (when buying free spins) does NOT work by chance. Therefore, not every time you buy free spins again, they are random and completely independent of the previous ones.
On the contrary, previous events have an influence on the future ones.
We could even predict with a probability of about 90% what will happen next. So whether it will be a fail or gamble.
Even the win amount depends on how much you won before.
The friend of mine is of the opinion he can explain himself only in such a way that the system '' mitschneidet'' and reacts depending upon.
On the question to him whether this is now the 100% proof that it does not go after coincidence he meant:
He could not speak of 100%, but with probability bordering on certainty 100%. He said if one assumes that everything would happen really purely by chance and the RTP witheinberechnet etc. these regularities/patterns should not occur.
The RTP as a whole is correct, however, he said
My explanation why this is nevertheless true and what sense it has then to cheat.
Quite simply: If it would run purely randomly it could happen that one hits 10 times in a row well and thus brings in nice wins. It can also happen that you get nothing 30 times in a row.
The first would be more Risk for the casino. The second would reduce the fun of the game enormously and probably make the player leave.
Funfact: In 2000 purchased free spins was my largest series in a row, so how many times he went to 16 free spins without loss in between 5 times. Only 5 times.
These 5 times were also all free spins in which he gave back just a little more than the bet.
What can you observe for example:
After a big win, he will not gamble on 16 for a long time, usually between 3-6 times.
If it does, then in 95% of cases these are bad to very mediocre free spins.
This is just a small thing that you can read out of the data.
Since I am not a mathematician I can not explain most of it exactly, so the conclusion of the friend of mine.
But I will ask him if he can write something together for me, then I could put it online.
He explains this really well and justifies this also scientifically.
If we read here so often that the free spins win is already fixed as soon as they run in, so you can at least with Extra Chilli maybe even assume that is already fixed before what you get in the next 10 times buy free spins.
If the Extra Chilli makes the question is no longer far whether not all do so.
It would be a great coincidence if only Extra Chilli would do that.
This post has been translated automatically
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
Had also bought a few times there and never won what right. Had some luck yesterday without buying,think I need to look for an alternative. I am open to suggestions.
Greetings
This post has been translated automatically
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
I've had good wins there too. That is not the issue.
The point is that the good and also the bad wins are not given at random
This post has been translated automatically
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
What I would find interesting is, do you have the raw data? Would then also very much like to evaluate - find something like that always very exciting. But if he would record, you can change that by reloading or play in another OC - possibly with another IP and Mac address? There you would have to do more research, I know that compulsively the RTP settles at each slot little by little. With large masses, they almost always come very close to the specified RTP with minimal fluctuations.
This post has been translated automatically
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
Right
The only problem is that I don't have them grouped together consistently.
We had to rummage through ourselves laboriously.
But I have anyway before these still clearly in ne Excel table to insert, that just takes time.
Then you can have them with pleasure, including our conclusions
This post has been translated automatically
BeTruG - Extra Chilli
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically