Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Casino verification: Proof of income (Page 6)

Topic created on 08th Apr. 2022 | Page: 6 of 11 | Answers: 108 | Views: 22,067
gamble1
Icon
Chris26 wrote on 05/05/2022 at 00:31
The source (thanks @Krabbenburger) on this even says that they are not allowed to pay out while the review is ongoing.

"In carrying out the CDD measures, customers may be allowed to continue using their gaming account while the licensee obtains any necessary information from the customer concerned. However, until such time as the licensee obtains the necessary information and documentation from the customer to meet its CDD obligations, the customer is not to be allowed to effect any withdrawals from the account independently of the amount involved. "

Yes but if the customer refuses no more check runs then this is simply failed and with which reason then the payment is refused ?

This post has been translated automatically

Chris26
Rookie
gamble1 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 00:48
Yes but if the customer refuses runs no more check then this is simply failed and with what justification is then the payout denied ?

presumably because then the suspicion of money laundering can not be ruled out....

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
Chris26 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 01:40
presumably because then the suspicion of money laundering can not be excluded....

Yes but the deposits they keep then there it can not be excluded theoretically if one thinks now times logically or not ? Then would have to be dissolved in the consequence of the entire business relationship and beautiful everything back to square one the customer gets all the money back and the casino also

Does that happen in practice ? Of course not likely because as good as everyone is in the red and the casino then yes the money would be missing so you just refuse the payout it can not be excluded but still you work with the I call it now times Risk money blithely further

If you look at it logically, it makes no sense or do you think seriously that they send everything to the authorities, including all the money that has flowed? The keep it certainly and if someone asks you have the evil evil customer yes blocked and fully intervened

That would be at least a very efficient strategy to maximize profits

Of course, this is all just theoretical I do not know how it actually runs but purely from a logical point of view, it is true what I say or not?

This post has been translated automatically

Chris26
Rookie
gamble1 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 02:43
Yes but the deposits they keep then there can it theoretically also not be excluded if one thinks now times logically or not ? Then would have to be dissolved but in the consequence of the entire business relationship and beautiful everything back to square one the customer gets all the money back and the casino also

Does that happen in practice ? Of course not likely because as good as everyone is in the red and the casino then yes the money would be missing so you just refuse the payout it can not be excluded but still you work with the I call it now times Risk money blithely further

If you look at it logically, it makes no sense or do you think seriously that they send everything to the authorities, including all the money that has flowed? The keep it certainly and if someone asks you have the evil evil customer yes blocked and fully intervened

That would be at least a very efficient strategy to maximize profits

Of course, this is all just theoretical I do not know how it actually runs but purely from a logical point of view it is true what I say or not ?

of course, yes... - but on the other hand it would be more profitable for them to let the customers continue to play with them... than to block them.

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
Chris26 wrote on 05/05/2022 at 02:58
of course, yes... - but on the other hand it would be more profitable for them to let the customers continue to play with them... than to block them.

Of course it would be but when you weigh up between getting hit on the roof by the authorities including high penalties and just blocking the customer and keeping the funds it should still be a rather advantageous situation for the casino

Therefore I think some stores (by far not all) have no interest at all to solve the check quickly and easily or how else can it be explained that these checks come even if you are in the plus or that of countless cards 60 pages transactions are required when you can easily prove the moment of receipt of the assets?

This post has been translated automatically

Jubla2014
Top Member
Servus!

Speaking of proof of income:

Today I had the fun of registering with Boombangvip, after I had read here in the forum, what they organize.

Made a mini Deposit of 30 euros, against my habit, with a 100% bonus via Skrill.

I played Extra Chilli, was able to wager the bonus and requested a withdrawal via Skrill.

Shortly after that I received an email saying that you had noticed that I had been very active lately and that I should prove my income.
You would have to require this for regulatory reasons.

Haha, you had landed on the right one.
I took a screenshot of the MGA bylaws regarding this that EveryMatrix had sent me, and sent a salted mail back.

I cancelled my withdrawal request and quickly gambled away my balance, closed my account.

I thought I couldn't do worse and worse than Platin and the Kannix group, but far from it.

The full SOW on a single deposit of 30 euros.

Oh yes, ganź forgotten: I should verify my Netellerkonto also, although I had deposited with Skrill.

Have a nice evening!

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
Jubla2014 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 17:25: Servus!

Speaking of proof of income:

Allowed myself the fun of signing up for Boombangvip today after reading here on the forum what they were hosting.

Made a mini Deposit of 30 euros, against my habit, with a 100% bonus via Skrill.

I played Extra Chilli, was able to wager the bonus and requested a withdrawal via Skrill.

Shortly after that I received an email saying that you had noticed that I had been very active lately and that I should prove my income.
You would have to require this for regulatory reasons.

Haha, you had landed on the right one.
I took a screenshot of the MGA bylaws regarding this that EveryMatrix had sent me, and sent a salted mail back.

I cancelled my withdrawal request and quickly gambled away my balance, closed my account.

I thought I couldn't do worse and worse than Platin and the Kannix group, but far from it.

The full SOW on a single deposit of 30 euros.

Oh yes, ganź forgotten: I should verify my Netellerkonto also, although I had deposited with Skrill.

Have a nice evening!

Lol then the store has also seen me for the last time have me there some time ago once registered and € 50 gambled if the but come directly with such an illogical nonsense at such mini amounts I have gambled there for the last time

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Jubla2014 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 17:25: Servus!

Speaking of proof of income:

Allowed myself the fun of signing up for Boombangvip today after reading here on the forum what they were hosting.

Made a mini Deposit of 30 euros, against my habit, with a 100% bonus via Skrill.

I played Extra Chilli, was able to wager the bonus and requested a withdrawal via Skrill.

Shortly after that I received an email saying that you had noticed that I had been very active lately and that I should prove my income.
You would have to require this for regulatory reasons.

Haha, you had landed on the right one.
I took a screenshot of the MGA bylaws regarding this that EveryMatrix had sent me, and sent a salted mail back.

I cancelled my withdrawal request and quickly gambled away my balance, closed my account.

I thought I couldn't do worse and worse than Platin and the Kannix group, but far from it.

The full SOW on a single deposit of 30 euros.

Oh yes, ganź forgotten: I should verify my Netellerkonto also, although I had deposited with Skrill.

Have a nice evening!

Yes, yesterday I also closed my account there, they have done without complaint, well then just not there anymore

This post has been translated automatically

garfield68
Elite
Jubla2014 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 17:25: Servus!

Speaking of proof of income:

Allowed myself the fun of signing up for Boombangvip today after reading here on the forum what they were hosting.

Made a mini Deposit of 30 euros, against my habit, with a 100% bonus via Skrill.

I played Extra Chilli, was able to wager the bonus and requested a withdrawal via Skrill.

Shortly after that I received an email saying that you had noticed that I had been very active lately and that I should prove my income.
You would have to require this for regulatory reasons.

Haha, you had landed on the right one.
I took a screenshot of the MGA bylaws regarding this that EveryMatrix had sent me, and sent a salted mail back.

I cancelled my withdrawal request and quickly gambled away my balance, closed my account.

I thought I couldn't do worse and worse than Platin and Kannix Group, but far from it.

The full SOW on a single deposit of 30 euros.

Oh yes, ganź forgotten: I should verify my Netellerkonto also, although I had deposited with Skrill.

Have a nice evening!

is very familiar to me, the same full program demand with me because of a 20 € deposit with skrill. they can me times...

This post has been translated automatically

garfield68
Elite
and especially if you have only 1x deposited or for weeks there was not active then such a mail " that you have noticed that I have been very active lately" haha... very funny.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics2nd Nov. 2024 at 06:36 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately