Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Casino verification: Attention One Casino Proof of Income Proof of Assets !!!!!!! (Page 4)

Topic created on 27th Sep. 2020 | Page: 4 of 7 | Answers: 64 | Views: 17,429
cbz490
Experienced
TranceBabe wrote on 09/28/2020 at 2:40 pm: cbz490


If this is really the case, then this check is really pure harassment. What does a payout have to do with how much I deposited before? Nothing! As a rule, this check is not carried out with many deposits but with high payouts, which brings the Player protection 0!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
TranceBabe wrote on 09/28/2020 at 2:40 pm: A****m

"...the regulator prove that the player was playing within his budget."


What would it mean for a payer if this was not the case?

Suppose a H4-recipient constantly gambles away his entire regulatory allowance and suddenly wins a large sum - could the casino say: "No! Cash stays here! You have violated the rules..."??

From when does a casino actually invoke this rule, if one has previously "illegitimately"
too much deposited or if the amount won is too high?

Is there a table where you can see at what income you can gamble / win how much?

Questions about questions....

This post has been translated automatically

DerHamburger87
Top Member
Tribeholz wrote on 09/28/2020 at 2:58 pm
"...the regulator prove the player was playing within his budget."


What would it mean for a payer if this was not the case?

Suppose a H4-recipient constantly gambles away his entire regulatory allowance and suddenly wins a large sum - could the casino say: "No! Cash stays here! You have violated the rules..."??

From when a casino actually invokes this rule, if one has previously "illegally"
too much deposited or if the amount won is too high?

Is there a table where you can see at what income you can gamble / win how much?

Questions about questions....

I join the flood of questions
An absolute impertinence that the own money is accepted within seconds thankfully without queries but with disbursements on the most exact your assets are asked.
Your mentioned example with the Hartz4 sentence is yes probably the cracker, that would mean yes as Hartz4 receiver is one too poor to win and too poor around much money to get paid out. More means this passage for me in the reverse conclusion not.
I am curious where that still leads

This post has been translated automatically

d****o

DerHamburger87 wrote on 09/28/2020 at 3:09 pm
I join the flood of questions
An absolute impudence that the own money is accepted within seconds thankfully without any queries but with payouts on the most exact your assets are asked.
Your mentioned example with the Hartz4 sentence is yes probably the cracker, that would mean yes as Hartz4 receiver is one too poor to win and too poor around much money to get paid out. More means this passage for me in the reverse conclusion not.
I am curious where that still leads.

The impudence would be then not the win, but how it can be that one pays in with Hartz 4. The money is for life security

and not to gamble. This is a blow for everyone in the face, the Arbeitet and pays taxes.

Conversely, this means that he gets too much Hartz 4, if he can gamble with it
He would be the best proof that Hartz 4 is set too high

But this would be in the case of a regulation in Germany end, since one would have the money flows under control, and for it
certainly also the social offices are interested. Unless one would continue to play illegally at other casinos.

This post has been translated automatically

DerHamburger87
Top Member
degro wrote on 09/28/2020 at 3:18 pm

The cheek would then not be the win, but how it can be that one pays in with Hartz 4. The money is for life security

thought, and not to gamble. This is a blow for everyone in the face, the Arbeitet and pays taxes.

Conversely, this means that he gets too much Hartz 4, if he can gamble with it
He would be the best proof that Hartz 4 is set too high

But this would be in the case of a regulation in Germany end, because one would have the money flows under control, and for it
certainly also the social offices are interested. Unless one would continue to play illegally at other casinos.

I give you so seen right and one should not play in any case with funds that serve the life security, Kindergeldern, other social funds and and and
The statement was meant as an example for low-income earners, whose funds do not come from offices or other social services and do not serve the livelihood
Someone who, after deducting his fixed costs such as rent, cell phone, electricity, etc has little or hardly any money left, is still free to decide in his actions about his money
And if I decide to Deposit my own money in the casino, then I want to receive my payout even if the win is unlikely but possible. No supervisory authority and no casino can make a fuss about my payout and say that I am not gambling within my financial means. I live and die with the consequences of my actions, whether I buy a book in the supermarket or deposit 10€ in the casino is my business

Of course, one should never gamble with social benefits.... I do not want to tell you how many Hartz4 recipients pilgrimage into the game halls on the 01st of each month. No one can understand that

This post has been translated automatically

sippi
Expert
degro wrote on 09/28/2020 at 3:18 pm

The cheek would then not be the win, but how it can be that one pays in with Hartz 4. The money is for life security

thought, and not to gamble. This is a blow for everyone in the face, the Arbeitet and pays taxes.

Conversely, this means that he gets too much Hartz 4, if he can gamble with it
He would be the best proof that Hartz 4 is set too high

But this would be in the case of a regulation in Germany end, because one would have the money flows under control, and for it
certainly also the social offices are interested. Unless one would continue to play illegally at other casinos.

Well, theoretically there are monthly also 10 € + or so in it, so that the "Hartzer" can buy ne pants or participate in social life (eg museum visit). Whether he does it, or whether he drinks it away, or whatever he does with this money, is irrelevant for the time being. (Online)Gambling should of course not be done if you get money from the state. That would have to be paid back, if they get the point. And probably you'll get an extra one on the lid, because you have not reported the wins (counts as income?).

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

degro wrote on 09/28/2020 at 3:18 pm

The cheek would then not be the win, but how it can be that one pays in with Hartz 4. The money is for life security

thought, and not to gamble. This is a blow for everyone in the face, the Arbeitet and pays taxes.

Conversely, this means that he gets too much Hartz 4, if he can gamble with it
He would be the best proof that Hartz 4 is set too high

But this would be in the case of a regulation in Germany end, because one would have the money flows under control, and for it
certainly also the social offices are interested. Unless one would continue to play illegally at other casinos.

That's kind of true, but these are ethical things that you address.

And ethics has nothing to do with terms and conditions, laws and regulators.

Besides, H4 does not necessarily mean that you are poor. In some cities there are said to be H4 recipients who drive up to the Arge with expensive limousines and designer suits...

This post has been translated automatically

Sahip74
Experienced
degro wrote on 09/28/2020 at 3:18 pm

The cheek would then not be the win, but how it can be that one pays in with Hartz 4. The money is for life security

thought, and not to gamble. This is a blow for everyone in the face, the Arbeitet and pays taxes.

Conversely, this means that he gets too much Hartz 4, if he can gamble with it
He would be the best proof that Hartz 4 is set too high

But this would be in the case of a regulation in Germany end, since one would have the money flows under control, and for it
certainly also the social offices are interested. Unless one would continue to play illegally at other casinos.

Whether it is spent on drugs, alcohol or cigarettes, but also no one is interested.
Everyone can do with his money but and let what he wants.
Not here sit the vultures, but on Malta with their illegal methods.Quite simply

This post has been translated automatically

Sindragosa
Rookie
Herould wrote on 09/27/2020 at 10:19 pm

No Katharina2 I haven't lost thousands,I don't own that much money at all.I like to play online casino from time to time,at home it's cozy with a cigarette and a glass of whiskey,and no stress like in the dive bars.

This post has been translated automatically

Sindragosa
Rookie
Sindragosa wrote on 09/28/2020 at 19:00

Huh? something went wrong

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 05:38 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately