Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Bonus & offers: Voodoo Dreams declares win void (Page 2)

Topic created on 07th Feb. 2019 | Page: 2 of 4 | Answers: 37 | Views: 9,865
Anonym
Maybe you fell into the trap in another game.

This post has been translated automatically

grazor
Rookie
That is 900 euros, for a casino, that's peanuts, it's not about the payout but about the rule violation. the 900 are gone

This post has been translated automatically

9****f
If the casino makes dis 100x in a certain period of time, that's 90.000€, and therefore
therefore no longer peanuts.

This is exactly what they are speculating on, otherwise they would set it up technically,
that it is not even possible to play with bonus over 5 Ero, or certain
Games to open.

Bonus is a profitable business model.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
9c-3f wrote on 08/02/2019 at 12:39 pm: If the casino dis makes 100x in a certain period of time, that's 90,000€, and
therefore no longer peanuts.

That's exactly what they are speculating on, otherwise they would set it up technically in such a way,
that it is not even possible to play with bonus over 5 Ero, or certain
Games to open.

Bonus is a profitable business model.

What you write is correct and is obviously handled by many Online Casinos, but I wonder if this is really a good strategy in the long run.

If a user does not get his win due to such a (max-bet, not allowed slots, etc.) rule violation, he is unlikely to leave money in this casino in the future. In addition, there are often negative publications in forums like this one, which drives high-potential customers to the competition.

Presumably, this is also a reason why one and the same Provider operates tens of different platforms. MT Securetrade Limited, for example, currently has 24 online casinos at the start (see MGA) - including well-known ones such as Rizk, Dunder and Guts. Before I register with a casino, I always check the MGA to see what name they operate under.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
9c-3f wrote on 08/02/2019 at 12:39 pm: If the casino dis makes 100x in a certain period of time, that's 90,000€, and
therefore no longer peanuts.

That's exactly what they are speculating on, otherwise they would set it up technically in such a way,
that it is not even possible to play with bonus over 5 Ero, or certain
Games to open.

Bonus is a profitable business model.

It is clear to everyone that the bonus conditions are a bit lazy, but the extent of it is unbelievable. I'll just list:

- Maximum payouts (for Deposit Bonuses!) at x times the last deposit or at most 100-500 €
- Wagering 100x or 160x d+b !!!! (are the highest I have seen so far, one of them was once e.g. at Dunder speak a "serious" casino)
- At Williamhills: At this Blazing Stars nodeposit bonus with wagering (35x?) and here it comes: 10 € max. cashout + wagering applies only in the same game
- Then something like 20% Deposit bonus with 35x d+b !?!?!
- Deposit 4000 € and get direct entry to Sakura Fortune free spins on 5 € (ok at least without wagering)
- Pay 200 € and play with 300 € (max cashout: 400 €)
- Lose 10 € and get 1 Cash Spin each time!!! (usable up to 100x) (value per spin: 0,20 €)
- Bet 40 € and get 1 Free Spin (up to 100x) with wagering 50x
- [...]

We should maybe make such a collective thread here with the worst bonuses (compiled most of my list from the CM thread).

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
But this shows that you have read the conditions.
If everyone would do that, there would be fewer problems.

This post has been translated automatically

Ichbins2018
Top Member
upola wrote on 08.02.2019 at 15:35: But that shows that you have read the conditions.
If everyone would do that, there would be less problems.

Predominantly I keep me out of such Treads....abaaaaaaaa -and just between us,

Ankor has ne prima list created - I have of course well-behaved read through and honestly, I can really imagine how it goes to some.
Probably I would have even read the terms and conditions, but would still have nothing gerallt from this whole bonus nonsense.

But maybe I'm just stupid?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
kyosuma wrote on 02/07/2019 21:10: And if, it's not their job to remind you of the rules you ACCEPTED....

A really terrific attitude...
The casinos that rip you off over time anyway should have the duty to limit this technically, which would be quite easy or the rule should be banned in general. If the casinos can not afford to give a bonus and deal fairly with the customer then they should leave it.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Since you have unfortunately had bad luck, some casinos then show at least a little goodwill but at Vodoo I would not have expected it.
This stupid rule should be banned by the MGA, either a casino gives a bonus and you can play as you want or there are just no more bonuses. The whole Bonuses are anyway only there to pull the money out of your pocket, because most do not manage to wager anyway. The people who win and pay out are minimized again and the win is optimized. This is what it looks like when you're really greedy, it's not enough that you earn vast sums, you come up with another crappy bonus system and fleece the people even more.

This post has been translated automatically

kyosuma
Experienced
Unbeliver wrote on February 08, 2019 at 4:27 pm
A really terrific attitude...
The casinos that rip you off over time anyway should have the duty to limit this technically, which would be quite easy or the rule should be banned in general. If the casinos can not afford to give a bonus and deal fairly with the customer then they should leave it.

If you are not able to read AGB's I would also exclude you, every fool knows that you have to read the contract before you sign it!
And this is also true in Online Casinos, sry but I see a thousand threads here with gejammer that no one gets his money and always it's the same;
"Was too stupid to read correctly" so excuse me times you are adults who can not read there is probably times themselves
And if one is zufaul the 2 kilometer Text of Doom in the Bonus terms and conditions to read, one has just bad luck!
As the saying goes: "Who can read is clearly at an advantage!" .
And yes I have a terrific attitude to people (People = Shit) Thank you

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 02:07 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately