Topic created on 05th Feb. 2019 | Page: 3 of 3 | Answers: 23 | Views: 5,637
Anonym
Former Member
Rizk.com Casino
6th Feb. 2019, at 11:22 am CET#21
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Jhahn wrote on 02/06/2019 at 10:24 am
So Ankor, I didn't mean to attack you at all. What I meant was, if someone writes to the support that he urgently needs the 10 euros that he had just deposited, it is from my point of view but obvious if the support then suggests to the person to simply times ne Weile suspend with games=cool off. Since they probably just have to comply with the rule that it must be implemented once, that is not only at Rizk so. What else should they write to you then, except that they have to keep their own rules. As for the support, I wrote that I never needed it, except for the Verification, so I did need it. That they are always great I have nowhere written? I do not have to defend Rizk or praise it to the skies, had only written my opinion regarding the 10 euros. Because it was just about the insane sum of 10 euros, which should not seem arrogant now, but I personally would have then just tried to implement once and if it had not worked, considered as an apprenticeship in this casino and the next 10 deposited in a casino where you can withdraw without implementing. No idea which casinos are then. Had this problem to Deposit by mistake, not yet.
I don't want any conflict here, even though my long posts sometimes seem to. I want to explain the reason for my post and I tried to keep it as short as possible:
There are always posts here where players describe problems with a casino, then there are posts that contain helpful information or neutral statements. But then there are posts that only contain the following "The casino is good/serious, I have never had any problems there" (sometimes also insinuations).
For example, one writes he has a problem with a self-exclusion at LeoVegas, then some arrive and write the casino is reputable and he can forget his plan. The UKGC sees it differently and after an investigation at Leovas imposes a huge fine for lack of Player protection and the advertising measures used (rightly so!) (See HERE). Of course, this does not make Leovegas a bad or unserious casino, Rizk is not a bad casino either. But every casino can sometimes wrong or not optimal react.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Rizk.com Casino
6th Feb. 2019, at 11:31 am CET#22
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Ankor wrote on 02-06-2019 11:22 AM
I don't want a conflict here, even though my long posts sometimes seem to be. I want to explain the reason for my post and I tried to make it as short as possible:
There are always posts here where players describe problems with a casino, then there are posts that contain helpful information or neutral statements. But then there are posts that only contain the following "The casino is good/serious, I have never had any problems there" (sometimes also insinuations).
For example, one writes he has a problem with a self-exclusion at LeoVegas, then some arrive and write the casino is reputable and he can forget his plan. The UKGC sees it differently and after an investigation at Leovas imposes a huge fine for lack of Player protection and the advertising measures used (rightly so!) (See HERE). Of course, this does not make Leovegas a bad or unserious casino, Rizk is not a bad casino either. But every casino can sometimes wrong or not optimal react.
All right. I'll sign that
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Rizk.com Casino
6th Feb. 2019, at 12:08 pm CET#23
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
My goodness. Someone who wants to offer support for 10 poplige free games a deal. What should the employee there think ? 🙄
Right, he will think to himself, the gentleman needs times n pause
Reminds me of the movie hiphop hood. The scene with the cheeseburger 🤔😁
Rizk.com Casino
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't want any conflict here, even though my long posts sometimes seem to. I want to explain the reason for my post and I tried to keep it as short as possible:
There are always posts here where players describe problems with a casino, then there are posts that contain helpful information or neutral statements. But then there are posts that only contain the following "The casino is good/serious, I have never had any problems there" (sometimes also insinuations).
For example, one writes he has a problem with a self-exclusion at LeoVegas, then some arrive and write the casino is reputable and he can forget his plan. The UKGC sees it differently and after an investigation at Leovas imposes a huge fine for lack of Player protection and the advertising measures used (rightly so!) (See HERE). Of course, this does not make Leovegas a bad or unserious casino, Rizk is not a bad casino either. But every casino can sometimes wrong or not optimal react.
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk.com Casino
Nobody has liked this post so far
All right. I'll sign that
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk.com Casino
Nobody has liked this post so far
Right, he will think to himself, the gentleman needs times n pause
Reminds me of the movie hiphop hood. The scene with the cheeseburger 🤔😁
This post has been translated automatically
Rizk.com Casino
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hahahahaha are you serious, the supporter must have banned you with the reason 'cringe'
Madness this hubris, Rizk makes millions in sales even without you 😂
This post has been translated automatically