Falko wrote on 09.12.2020 at 16:52: I think Gamblejoe will soon integrate another > Mensch ärgere dich nicht < game on his platform.
Then people will complain again that the cube doesn't have a balanced RTP, and that it's generally impossible to build a perfectly even cube. It's quantum physics. Look it up!
No flack: the calendar is exactly as it needs to be in a gamer forum. Thanks to the team!
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
9th Dec. 2020, at 05:39 pm CET#34
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Kanalmalocher wrote on 09.12.2020 at 17:25
Then people will complain again that the cube doesn't have a balanced RTP, and that it's generally impossible to build a perfectly uniform cube. Is quantum physics. Look it up!
No flack: the calendar is exactly as it needs to be in a gamer forum. Thanks to the team!
On the subject with the beloved and hated calendar
I had no luck last year and this year so far unfortunately not either
But I have already won 4-5 times in a row in the monthly raffle of Gj what some others were denied certainly also
I am of the opinion that one should give more and feel it personally not as bad if others win 3,4 or 5 times
I would know also honestly only one way to prevent this and that is to take the winners out of the race but then also for future monthly lotteries because otherwise possibly by chance again some would be favored and if then fair for all lotteries
But then I guarantee you there will be again people who are dissatisfied and there will be 100,000 fake accounts in the hope not to be recognized to be able to participate again
Criticism is ok but we should all stay on the carpet and be thankful for the actions that GJ brings here the users get more than from most large corporations that make 100% far more revenue than GJ
Of course Gj lives to a large extent only because of us people who come together here every day but for me it also makes the impression that one is grateful for each individual and is not at all aloof and so it should be
So thanks to the team on a nice December in this terrible year
(Missing only that on 24.12 as a small Christmas miracle Daniel comes back online)
Blubbo33 wrote on 09.12.2020 at 17:46: That criticism comes is normal, there is every year
And why are you not allowed to publish your criticism?
Just because gamblejoe gives away something ?
If that is Begbie's opinion and he stands behind it, that is perfectly correct and his right.
And just for the record, it's great to participate in a lottery for free, but gamblejoe doesn't do it out of charity
They have also not knossi at that time for free a few thousand given . Whether the desired effect was achieved with it, is sometimes put to the test
He has the right to criticize and I am also not rarely his opinion. However, all others also have the right to express their opinion on this very criticism and for me this criticism is unjustified in this case.
The RNG and fairness are criticized, but the definition of what is fair goes beyond "once you're in, you don't win". The aim of the criticism is that the individual himself has a higher chance to win. The lottery or the Advent calendar should be changed so that an even distribution takes place. The reason behind this is that one does not trust the RNG and exactly this reasoning I do not understand.
A random factor is inherently fair (in terms of a lottery) because it disregards any previous events. Slight restrictions like you can't win twice in a row I understand. But if we want to make it really fair, then you have to calculate that in time now. How many times someone has won and how many times they have participated. This allows you to determine factors, up to a factor of 2 you can still win in a lottery and beyond that you have to wait until the factor lowers again.
The whole lotteries and lotteries are led by it into the absurdity. The only rule I halfway understand is that you should not win twice in a row in the advent calendar. It distorts the lottery anyway, but leads to the fact that some are less upset about it.
This post has been translated automatically
T****s
Forum posts:388Member has been banned
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
9th Dec. 2020, at 06:57 pm CET#39
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
The calendar runs yes still a few days Let's see folks
In programming, there is a primitive randomness that delivers a supposedly random result, but nevertheless always follows a certain "scheme". If this primitive randomness were put into the slots, the casinos would have gone bankrupt long ago, since it would sooner or later be possible to see through the "scheme".
But you can feed the programmed randomness with additional parameters to create deeply nested coincidences. Just like the slots do. Here, of course, it is not completely impossible that the same result is drawn several times in a row, but it is much less likely.
Now you don't have to make a science out of it and program for hours. Other smart people have already done that and offer it for download. But GJ has tunnel vision and insists on his one man coder show.
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: nastja439
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: DiamondDonut, Falko, garfield68, nastja439
Then people will complain again that the cube doesn't have a balanced RTP, and that it's generally impossible to build a perfectly even cube. It's quantum physics. Look it up!
No flack: the calendar is exactly as it needs to be in a gamer forum. Thanks to the team!
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
Very good!
You have been successfully vaccinated...
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: Saphira, S****i
And why can't you publish your criticism?
Just because gamblejoe gives away something?
If that is Begbie's opinion and he stands behind it, that is perfectly correct and his right.
And just for the record, it's great to participate in a lottery for free, but gamblejoe doesn't do it out of charity
They have also not knossi at that time for free a few thousand given . Whether the desired effect was achieved with it, is sometimes put to the test
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: Counter, garfield68, Julian, Sarkasto
I had no luck last year and this year so far unfortunately not either
But I have already won 4-5 times in a row in the monthly raffle of Gj what some others were denied certainly also
I am of the opinion that one should give more and feel it personally not as bad if others win 3,4 or 5 times
I would know also honestly only one way to prevent this and that is to take the winners out of the race but then also for future monthly lotteries because otherwise possibly by chance again some would be favored and if then fair for all lotteries
But then I guarantee you there will be again people who are dissatisfied and there will be 100,000 fake accounts in the hope not to be recognized to be able to participate again
Criticism is ok but we should all stay on the carpet and be thankful for the actions that GJ brings here the users get more than from most large corporations that make 100% far more revenue than GJ
Of course Gj lives to a large extent only because of us people who come together here every day but for me it also makes the impression that one is grateful for each individual and is not at all aloof and so it should be
So thanks to the team on a nice December in this terrible year
(Missing only that on 24.12 as a small Christmas miracle Daniel comes back online)
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: B****3
Yeah I don't believe in random there anymore when the same ones always win every year.
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: S****i
He has the right to criticize and I am also not rarely his opinion. However, all others also have the right to express their opinion on this very criticism and for me this criticism is unjustified in this case.
The RNG and fairness are criticized, but the definition of what is fair goes beyond "once you're in, you don't win". The aim of the criticism is that the individual himself has a higher chance to win. The lottery or the Advent calendar should be changed so that an even distribution takes place. The reason behind this is that one does not trust the RNG and exactly this reasoning I do not understand.
A random factor is inherently fair (in terms of a lottery) because it disregards any previous events. Slight restrictions like you can't win twice in a row I understand. But if we want to make it really fair, then you have to calculate that in time now. How many times someone has won and how many times they have participated. This allows you to determine factors, up to a factor of 2 you can still win in a lottery and beyond that you have to wait until the factor lowers again.
The whole lotteries and lotteries are led by it into the absurdity. The only rule I halfway understand is that you should not win twice in a row in the advent calendar. It distorts the lottery anyway, but leads to the fact that some are less upset about it.
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
And no I didn't win anything either.
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: s00pernanny
Then tell me, who won last year and this year?
Let you time, takes certainly something until you have everything out.
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
But you can feed the programmed randomness with additional parameters to create deeply nested coincidences. Just like the slots do. Here, of course, it is not completely impossible that the same result is drawn several times in a row, but it is much less likely.
Now you don't have to make a science out of it and program for hours. Other smart people have already done that and offer it for download. But GJ has tunnel vision and insists on his one man coder show.
This post has been translated automatically