Landbased Casinos in general: Tr.5 gets replenishment from the state

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

deadlands3 wrote on 02/23/2019 04:31: I found out a few weeks ago from an acquaintance who is an arcade operator that the state has pushed an amendment to Tr.5 and couldn't believe it listen to this



" For devices after Tr.5.1 1 code may be issued per person "


" However, if a guest who already has a code for a device finds a device that has not been logged out by the previous guest, he may use and play on this device in addition to his device that comes after TR5.1

Do you notice anything? Billions were paid for the conversion of everything was made less attractive and now you can play the great devices with code and even two

There goes one fetches a code plays 2 € goes away and gives the device to his buddy or one knows the supervision and gets two codes because it is not verifiable in case of a control and you can simply say the device was not logged out

The great Tr5 for Player protection and now everything is almost like the old devices again

It can not be or we are yet so fooled

I have times the test made on the new devices I lose on average more than before that does not fit in front and behind with the argument of player protection

And I mean you would have to set a fixed limit eg one code per week so that this system would make sense as long as you can change the devices at any time, it is still possible to lose a lot eg.

Device 1 50 € lose before the break device change then device 2 50 € lose change again

This makes no sense according to my calculation and I consider the Tr5 highly ineffective for player protection

I think player protection is important but it upsets me to take this as a pretext to enrich themselves even more than with Tr.4.1 It is made profit with sick people and all under the guise that Tr.5 is so safe

Then please a system that really brings something and not just a great name with which you can advertise such as "Game 5.0 the future is now"

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie wrote on 02/23/2019 10:45 am: so I have not seen in any hall that the supervisor makes sure that despite the code only one device may be played.
it is simply tacitly tolerated.
and the change probably only refers to the worst-case scenario, when the regulatory office looks in.
which is quite unlikely per se, since they don't have the manpower for such a thing.
eyewash on all sides of the involved parties.
the new technical guideline only serves to keep the left-wing hypersensitive do-gooders quiet.

This post has been translated automatically

Skeptic wrote on 02/23/2019 10:18 AM

With TR5 and following comes to bear what the vending machines propagate more: We play fair. Better: we pay fairly. Namely, good for such "laws". That they are a joke, you can now really not deny. And it is also not conceivable that this just "happened". The European Schnullerverordnung is a good counterexample. A formulation was built in for every eventuality. With the TR 5 one hears only: "Hoppala, that is however stupidly run

Inhumane joke.

This post has been translated automatically

Horsepower44 wrote on 02/23/2019 11:15 AM
What the heck is the pacifier ordinance?

This post has been translated automatically

Skeptic wrote on 02/23/2019 11:24 AM

This is that several 100 pages long regulation which describes exactly how a baby pacifier including its "attachments" (chain, ring, etc...) has to be, so that it may come on the market. Any eventuality that could harm the well-being of the baby was ruled out by pages and pages of regulations. Hundreds of people have thought about this for years

This post has been translated automatically

Horsepower44 wrote on 02/23/2019 11:29 AM
Okay... But who hasn't seen the headlines of babies who had accidents and died who were sedated with non-compliant pacifiers...

This post has been translated automatically