Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Landbased Casinos in general: Raid against gambling house clan (Page 7)

Topic created on 28th Sep. 2018 | Page: 7 of 11 | Answers: 109 | Views: 23,965
Matthias
Expert
We have talked in detail about stkrie in the Monday meeting of October 1, 2018 in the entire team. Unfortunately, in recent months we have repeatedly found that stkrie has deliberately provoked in the forum, frightened away members and even our warnings were ignored again after a short time. As a result, we have weighed up to what extent stkrie helps or harms the community. He has violated our netiquette countless times, which states that we must always treat each other with respect. For this reason we have banned him permanently today.
Certainly, some users will now consider stkrie's ban as censorship, since stkrie has always spoken out against online casinos. But we banned him not because of his opinion, but simply because of the manners towards new users and members who simply disagreed. Furthermore, he did not even back up his accusations with arguments lately, so he only provoked individuals.
We hope that he will find a peaceful way to deal with his inner rage.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I think it's good because his negative nature / energy was really troublesome.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Too bad. I always found his manner refreshing, even if he overshot the mark from time to time

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
I also think it's a pity, although we rarely agreed.
Now some will probably be very happy.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Difficult. I've followed some heated discussions here and sometimes the whole thing gets pretty out of hand. But I think a forum can cope with that and who feels stepped on the feet of someone, can simply ignore them.

So I do it at least, if it is too colorful for me and in a forum that is not difficult to simply read over certain things

You have rules, if they are not followed, consequences will follow, I am aware of that. However, I find a permanent ban somehow too violent, unless it is obviously a troll or fake

Partly, discussions were also instigated by him, which have led to beautiful further discussions

Admittedly, there were also often mutually insulting statements, which I do not approve of in principle

It is not my forum, it is not my decision, but perhaps one should give him again a "chance", if that is at all wanted. Even if there were already some warnings before

This is also not meant to be a defense letter, but simply a basic opinion on my part.

LG

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I find this blocking also not good, very sad that you can not handle provocations and criticism from some.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
As an addition: there were also some pretty harsh insults against him, which were probably accepted. A forum lives on different opinions. The discussions with him have partly degenerated because of others who wanted to provoke him

Is your forum and your rules. I would wish for the future, however, uniform rules, because it is partly incomprehensible to me why he was now banned and in the past users who have not paid back money or had several accounts were allowed to stay here.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
Zockertyp89 wrote on 01.10.2018 at 13:05: Still as a supplement: against him there were but also partly quite harsh insults, which were probably accepted so. A forum lives now times from different opinions. The discussions with him are partly also degenerated because of others who wanted to provoke him

Is your forum and your rules. I would wish for the future, however, uniform rules, because it is partly incomprehensible to me why he was now banned and in the past users who have not paid back money or had several accounts were allowed to stay here.

Will actually not say anything big on the subject, but not paying money back is really nothing that concerns the forum management something. These are private loan transactions with which GJ has nothing at all to do. Nevertheless, they still warn against it and say you should not lend money to anyone here, or generally on the Internet (which is actually self-evident)

The team takes care that the forum is kept orderly and clear, what the members do privately among themselves is their business. The admins here are not our parents who must exercise an educational mission

This post has been translated automatically

K****t
I'm probably the last person who should defend stkrie, especially also because of his arguably right-wing attitude, which is absolutely abhorrent to me and should be abhorrent to everyone.
But what I want to denounce is the typical accusation that one is a Hartz IV recipient when one is either frustrated, dissatisfied, of a different opinion, impudent or whatever.
Regardless of whether someone receives Hartz VI or not, this stigmatization is problematic in various ways.
Not only are all unemployed people lumped together and humiliated, but the person who actually has to struggle with it is humiliated even further.
This really doesn't have to be the case.
No one here knows why anyone is unemployed (if anyone is). One should avoid using clichés when presenting one's own opinion.

What is also annoying and probably also pushed stkrie the one or other time to cheekiness (which I don't defend), is the fact that here by almost everyone everything is constantly put down as fact.
We've had this topic before
Whether it's the GambleJoe team or users here, no one really knows what's going on, and yet it's declared as knowledge and fact.
Either you are interested in finding the truth, if it is ever possible, or you are just trying to push your view through for various reasons.

Don't see what's hard about making it clear that you think this or that... "in my opinion..." / "I would say that..." / "as far as I know...."
It's incredibly annoying when people always talk about something as fact that no one knows for sure.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Bone wrote on 01/10/2018 at 13:10
Don't really want to say much on the subject, but not paying money back is really none of the forum management's business. These are private loan deals GJ has nothing to do with at all. Nevertheless, they still warn against it and say you should not lend money to anyone here, or in general on the Internet (which is actually self-evident)

The team takes care that the forum is kept orderly and clear, what the members do privately among themselves is their business. The admins here are not our parents who must exercise an educational mission.

In my opinion it is against good manners to scrounge all people here and not to pay back money. Such a thing poisons the climate. But each as he means.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 10:46 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately