Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Landbased Casinos in general: Raid against gambling house clan (Page 10)

Topic created on 28th Sep. 2018 | Page: 10 of 11 | Answers: 109 | Views: 23,960
Knochen
Elite
So then I have to give my two cents.

I think I'm not the only one here who doesn't like to read through a page-long thread for the hundredth time in which the "Malta Mafia" bullshit tap dances on the grave of objective argumentation. If you are looking for RTL entertainment then watch RTL, a forum is for exchange and not for the entertainment of individuals with questionable humor taste. Apart from the insults, the recurring non-arguments and the dubious views - strkie has managed to argue with pretty much every member who was of a different opinion, someone who is really simply not able to lead a discussion can not enrich a discussion. You can have different opinions, you can exchange ideas and you can develop an antipathy, but the correct way of dealing with each other is always a prerequisite. This is a forum and not the shitty jungle camp. Personally, I would have been bums no matter whether they ban him or not, this is really only a RTL moderate gossip story that briefly has my interest, from the point of view of the forum management, this step is absolutely right and understandable

How you come here to attack me, however, is ridiculous. So I insult subliminally? You and your figurehead strkie took me for a Wunderino employee on my first day here, then attacked me in every thread. Later I was suddenly owner of various double accounts, only because of the PSCs here, still lived with mom and was "10 ct gambler". You are with your way not a bit more sympathetic, sociable or enriching for the forum than strkie, more than half of your posts are negative, attacking or exactly what you accuse me of: indirectly insulting

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Bone wrote on 01/10/2018 at 23:39: So then I must also give my two cents.

I think I'm not the only one here who doesn't like reading through a page long thread for the hundredth time where the "Malta Mafia" bullshit tap dances on the grave of factual argumentation. If you are looking for RTL entertainment then watch RTL, a forum is for exchange and not for the entertainment of individuals with questionable humor taste. Apart from the insults, the recurring non-arguments and the dubious views - strkie has managed to argue with pretty much every member who was of a different opinion, someone who is really simply not able to lead a discussion can not enrich a discussion. You can have different opinions, you can exchange ideas and you can develop an antipathy, but the correct way of dealing with each other is always a prerequisite. This is a forum and not the shitty jungle camp. Personally, I would have been bums no matter whether they ban him or not, this is really only a RTL moderate gossip story that briefly has my interest, from the point of view of the forum management, this step is absolutely right and understandable

How you come here to attack me, however, is ridiculous. So I insult subliminally? You and your figurehead strkie took me for a Wunderino employee on my first day here, then attacked me in every thread. Later I was suddenly owner of various double accounts, only because of the PSCs here, still lived with mom and was "10 ct gambler". You are with your way not a bit more sympathetic, sociable or enriching for the forum than strkie, more than half of your posts are negative, attacking or exactly what you accuse me of: indirectly insulting.

But it is amazing how much you are annoyed because of a small allusion on my part immediately write half a novel.

And with it you see it quite clearly. That you are just not this in you resting chillige type you always pretend to be, but even very frustrated and negative attitude.

You are just smarter in some points than stkrie and you have deliberately always pressed the right buttons with him so that we come exactly to the situation to which it has now come. Stkrie was banned and you are the nice innocent lamb.

And a stkrie who is not quite so elegant in the manners, is always more enriching than a bone that wants to persuade new users here again and again that Wunderino does not intentionally cheat people. So you support these criminals namely even.

And that you have no idea of economics, we have already established.
Therefore, it is not surprising that you can not understand my points. But I am sure that the Gamblejoe team can and will see it at the latest with the declining user activity.


That it would be you quite right if I also still disappear I believe you. Then you could undisturbed here continue to manipulate people and steer threads in the direction you want.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Bone wrote on 01/10/2018 at 23:39: So then I must also give my two cents.

I guess I'm not the only one here who doesn't like reading through a page long thread for the hundredth time where the "Malta Mafia" bullshit is tap dancing on the grave of factual argumentation. If you are looking for RTL entertainment then watch RTL, a forum is for exchange and not for the entertainment of individuals with questionable humor taste. Apart from the insults, the recurring non-arguments and the dubious views - strkie has managed to argue with pretty much every member who was of a different opinion, someone who is really simply not able to lead a discussion can not enrich a discussion. You can have different opinions, you can exchange ideas and you can develop an antipathy, but the correct way of dealing with each other is always a prerequisite. This is a forum and not the shitty jungle camp. Personally, I would have been bums no matter whether they ban him or not, this is really only a RTL moderate gossip story that briefly has my interest, from the point of view of the forum management, this step is absolutely right and understandable

How you come here to attack me, however, is ridiculous. So I insult subliminally? You and your figurehead strkie took me for a Wunderino employee on my first day here, then attacked me in every thread. Later I was suddenly owner of various double accounts, only because of the PSCs here, still lived with mom and was "10 ct gambler". You are with your way not a bit more sympathetic, sociable or enriching for the forum than strkie, more than half of your posts are negative, attacking or exactly what you accuse me of: indirectly insulting.

You are just like that Crypto, a pathetic human being .

This post has been translated automatically

S****8
Zaroo8 wrote on 02/10/2018 08:18 PM

You are just like this Crypto, a pathetic human being .

Fill your statement with arguments please !!!???

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Sweep88 wrote on 02/10/2018 at 09:22 PM
Fill your statement with arguments please !!!???

Sweep, we'll do it the other way around today, you bring some arguments that refute my statement .

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Bone wrote on 01/10/2018 at 23:39: So then I must also give my two cents.

I guess I'm not the only one here who doesn't like reading through a page long thread for the hundredth time where the "Malta Mafia" bullshit is tap dancing on the grave of factual argumentation. If you are looking for RTL entertainment then watch RTL, a forum is for exchange and not for the entertainment of individuals with questionable humor taste. Apart from the insults, the recurring non-arguments and the dubious views - strkie has managed to argue with pretty much every member who was of a different opinion, someone who is really simply not able to lead a discussion can not enrich a discussion. You can have different opinions, you can exchange ideas and you can develop an antipathy, but the correct way of dealing with each other is always a prerequisite. This is a forum and not the shitty jungle camp. Personally, I would have been bums no matter whether they ban him or not, this is really only a RTL moderate gossip story that briefly has my interest, from the point of view of the forum management, this step is absolutely right and understandable

How you come here to attack me, however, is ridiculous. So I insult subliminally? You and your figurehead strkie took me for a Wunderino employee on my first day here, then attacked me in every thread. Later I was suddenly owner of various double accounts, only because of the PSCs here, still lived with mom and was "10 ct gambler". You are with your way not a bit more sympathetic, sociable or enriching for the forum than strkie, more than half of your posts are negative, attacking or exactly what you accuse me of: indirectly insulting.

Moin moin

You always try to embody a person you can never hold a candle to in real life.

Just how you describe the topics it was Stkrie, but actually only shows that you are the one who collides with people who are of a different opinion... quite negatively afflicted.

I could bet that you have popped the corks at the info of the lock. I also don't think you care as you write, where you have made a significant contribution to the lock.

You actually dare to deny others decent contact, where you yourself in a disgusting leftist way, often argued disparagingly.

The difference between your and Stkrie's argumentation was only that you never had the balls in the pants, your frustration openly to present ... but always nicely hidden between the lines.

In addition, I see other significant differences in that your contributions rather follow the motto, quantity instead of quality and war instead of peace.

I am truly someone who criticizes and thus stimulates reflection rather than someone who only follows the source of money and bends for it in all necessary directions.

Custom, virtue, morality?

All qualities that have remained far from you.
It has some decency to admit mistakes and to apologize for them.

Weren't you the one who completely ignored Stkrie's public apology?

When asked "why" you reacted so coldly, your answer was, "He should have apologized for other things as well".

What a diplomatic move... lol

Do you think you are God that should be begged for your mercy? Certainly not, because the good Lord has more mercy than you and even forgives everything.

Perhaps your action at that time seems banal to you, but no, my dear, it is of great importance, the rejection shows how purposefully you have ostracized after war...
even if you were able to put the Trojan horse into the hands of some, you should know that others exposed it beforehand

Actually, I do not care about you, but as long as I represent the following quote not only with the mouth but with the essential, namely the heart, I see myself forced to intervene....

"When injustice becomes right, resistance becomes a duty".







This post has been translated automatically

CasinoManiac
Rookie
Samira wrote on 02/10/2018 at 10:23 am
Moin moin

You always try to embody a person you can never hold a candle to in real life.

Just how you describe the issues it was Stkrie, but actually only shows that you are the one who collides with people who are different view... pretty negative afflicted.

I could bet that you have popped the corks at the info of the lock. I also don't think you care as you write, where you have made a significant contribution to the lock.

You actually dare to deny others decent contact, where you yourself in a disgusting leftist way, often argued disparagingly.

The difference between your and Stkrie's argumentation was only that you never had the balls in the pants, your frustration openly to present ... but always nicely hidden between the lines.

In addition, I see other significant differences in that your contributions rather follow the motto, quantity instead of quality and war instead of peace.

I am truly someone who criticizes and thus stimulates reflection rather than someone who only follows the source of money and bends for it in all necessary directions.

Custom, virtue, morality?

All qualities that have remained far from you.
It has some decency to admit mistakes and to apologize for them.

Weren't you the one who completely ignored Stkrie's public apology?

When asked "why" you reacted so coldly, your answer was, "He should have apologized for other things as well".

What a diplomatic move... lol

Do you think you are God that should be begged for your mercy? Certainly not, because the good Lord has more mercy than you and even forgives everything.

Perhaps your action at that time seems banal to you, but no, my dear, it is of great importance, the rejection shows how purposefully you have ostracized after war...
even if you were able to put the Trojan horse into the hands of some, you should know that others exposed it beforehand

Actually, I do not care about you, but as long as I represent the following quote not only with the mouth but with the essential, namely the heart, I see myself forced to intervene....

"When injustice becomes right, resistance becomes a duty".








i don't care about the discussion about stkrie. in the end, he had shown me in an argument that he had no proof for his theories and only very weak arguments.

i find it funny, however, that you denounce the "disgusting leftist way" here, but at the end you bring a quote, which is always attributed to Berthold Brecht - you have to bring that first. Shows at least that you are still open to other views

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
CasinoManiac wrote on 02.10.2018 at 10:39 am
i don't care about the discussion about stkrie. in the end he had shown me in an argument that he had no proof for his theories and only very weak arguments.

i find it funny, however, that you denounce the "disgusting leftist way" here, but at the end you bring a quote, which is always attributed to berthold brecht - you have to bring that first. Shows at least that you are still open to other views.

Hey... can't quite follow you... that's exactly the point

Or do you find the denounced just?

Finds very appropriate, in my opinion Stkrie was treated too unfairly and therefore my resistance ?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
To your first mentioned...

What evidence have you provided that it is not?

Stkrie has only ever tried to explain that it is possible and cannot be ruled out

He has also provided some evidence for this conclusion; he has addressed the uncovering of the relationship between politics and OCs, which has obviously been a criminal undertaking at least since the Paradise Papers

He has provided explanations why one should not blindly believe that everything is above board... e.g. VW etc.

What has the other side delivered?

The mathematics and that all casinos have no influence on the slots, because the connection is made when playing to the servers of the player manufacturers

Helloooo... more does not go?

In addition, still comes for me the biggest proof... namely the own mind, if this is used, some things become clear.

To underpin it again with a quotation...

"Use your own mind"

E. Kant

These are true words that can do a lot, but unfortunately the masses are too tired for that... they let others think for them.

Have a nice day ... Maniac ?

This post has been translated automatically

CasinoManiac
Rookie
Samira wrote on 02.10.2018 at 10:59 am
Hey... don't quite follow you... that's the point

Or do you think the denounced is fair?

Finds very appropriate, in my opinion Stkrie was treated too unfairly and hence my opposition ?

what is right or wrong, courts should decide. nevertheless, briefly my view on the matter:


operators of a forum have a quasi house right and may decide who may be there and who not.


stkrie has often been hostile to people and violated the forum rules (by his way of letting out his frustration here). according to julian he had more warnings than anyone else here - it didn't come out of the blue. i think he knew exactly what he was doing and even wanted to be banned in the end. but i'm out of this topic now, what's the point


"nothing changed, because nothing stayed and came or went, because everything was a coming and a going."

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 10:04 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately