i am also subject to this gaming fallacy in a certain way, even if I have become a bit more relaxed in this respect and play a relatively hot slot again in individual cases. On the whole, however, it has proven itself...who has paid fat or at least 2-3 times in a short time has given free spins, will not be touched in the future temporarily (at this one casino) and the other way around: cold slots usually first further tortured until they possibly pay. Is now times so my strategy, even if the logic does not support this
I have earlier as I could still read somewhere times that is suspected that the machines evtl "first-time players" or players who do not show the typical behavior of a regular player can recognize and then partially pay out more wins. This was probably meant that e.g. the games are first flipped through something and then one or the other game is opened and after a few turns or immediately closed again to choose another ... Something like that... But can also be that I have misread 🤭
saschamk wrote on 22.01.2023 at 14:52 clock: I have earlier than I could still read somewhere times that is suspected that the machines evtl "first-time players" or players who do not show the typical behavior of a regular player can recognize and then partially pay out more wins. This was probably meant that e.g. the games are first flipped through something and then one or the other game is opened and after a few turns or immediately closed again to choose another ... Something like that... But can also be that I have misread 🤭
Ne that I have also heard that similar systems as zb. at VW are used to recognize the young novice drivers and intervene supportive
K****s wrote on 19.01.2023 at 00:38: Hello I have no luck at all. Was almost two years no longer play... When I started to play again, I had immediately in each Spielothek luck and have immediately won... When I went in for the second time was only little win and then nothing more. Me and my girlfriend noticed that "new" visitors win immediately. Could it be that they are watching us?
Hmm... Counter questions: How scientific is this observation or is it a feeling? Do no wins take place, or do the wins have a stronger effect after a long break than at the end of a session and are therefore remembered more strongly? Has attention been paid to the fact that a machine can give out many small wins but also few and larger ones? And doesn't a winner in the gaming hall as well as always generally stand out more because the win simply occurs less often?
I would say the answer is a mixture of coincidence and the so-called "observation error".
Are we being watched?
Liked this post: Anonym
i am also subject to this gaming fallacy in a certain way, even if I have become a bit more relaxed in this respect and play a relatively hot slot again in individual cases. On the whole, however, it has proven itself...who has paid fat or at least 2-3 times in a short time has given free spins, will not be touched in the future temporarily (at this one casino) and the other way around: cold slots usually first further tortured until they possibly pay. Is now times so my strategy, even if the logic does not support this
This post has been translated automatically
Are we being watched?
Liked this post: CashOut, refucs
This post has been translated automatically
Are we being watched?
Liked this post: saschamk
Ne that I have also heard that similar systems as zb. at VW are used to recognize the young novice drivers and intervene supportive
This post has been translated automatically
Are we being watched?
Liked this post: Anonym
Hmm... Counter questions: How scientific is this observation or is it a feeling? Do no wins take place, or do the wins have a stronger effect after a long break than at the end of a session and are therefore remembered more strongly? Has attention been paid to the fact that a machine can give out many small wins but also few and larger ones? And doesn't a winner in the gaming hall as well as always generally stand out more because the win simply occurs less often?
I would say the answer is a mixture of coincidence and the so-called "observation error".
This post has been translated automatically