I see it completely differently. In OC, with odds of 95-97%, I have also had significantly more wins and significantly more fun playing for a long time. Show me a player who plays regularly and is still in the black after a few months in the arcade.
There are some with good odds, but few or none with poor odds...
Example calculation: I play in the arcade with a bet of 20 cents and have a gaming turnover of 1000 EUR (= 5000 spins).
1000 x 0.78 payout ratio = 780 EUR at the end over a long period of time.
This means an average loss of 220 EUR.
And now in the casino: 1000 x 0.94 = 940 EUR over a long period of time.
So only just under 60 EUR loss.
Or, even better, in a "real" online casino (Curacao etc.): 1000 x 0.965 = 965 EUR back out.
Maria_Sonntag wrote on 09.09.2024 at 09:29: A payout ratio of 94% says nothing about what you get in the end. 1. firstly, this is only calculated on the one-time use of the money and secondly, the frame is still missing (i.e. how high the deviation is). If it were a fixed 94%, nobody would play, because if they knew beforehand that they were guaranteed to get €94 for €100 (i.e. no more and no less), it would be pointless.
And I don't know any players who only "twist" the money they've wagered once. It's always a question of how often the money is wagered. At 94%, 94% remains for the first round, 88.36% for the second, 83.06% for the third and 78.08% for the fourth (just from the quota).
The 94% RTP figure is therefore more of a marketing gimmick.... To be honest, the odds in the arcade are not that much different.
I wouldn't say it's a marketing gag.
There has to be some kind of reference value.
If Hubert always pays out after wagering his depositor once, he will probably have a better personal RTP than Liselotte, who always plays until everything is gone or she has the wildline. But that is not the benchmark and not comparable.
The RTP also does not refer to the one-time wagering of the money, but tens of millions of simulated spins.
AQ Slot in German Casinos
Nobody has liked this post so far
There are some with good odds, but few or none with poor odds...
Example calculation: I play in the arcade with a bet of 20 cents and have a gaming turnover of 1000 EUR (= 5000 spins).
1000 x 0.78 payout ratio = 780 EUR at the end over a long period of time.
This means an average loss of 220 EUR.
And now in the casino: 1000 x 0.94 = 940 EUR over a long period of time.
So only just under 60 EUR loss.
Or, even better, in a "real" online casino (Curacao etc.): 1000 x 0.965 = 965 EUR back out.
So on average "only" just under EUR 35 loss.
These are worlds apart.
This post has been translated automatically
AQ Slot in German Casinos
Liked this post: Pat1991
I wouldn't say it's a marketing gag.
There has to be some kind of reference value.
If Hubert always pays out after wagering his depositor once, he will probably have a better personal RTP than Liselotte, who always plays until everything is gone or she has the wildline. But that is not the benchmark and not comparable.
The RTP also does not refer to the one-time wagering of the money, but tens of millions of simulated spins.
This post has been translated automatically